thom w wrote:
Arch once posted "how do you know when a bi**h is lying, her lips are moving". I probably called him on it for a year, but no one else found it interesting. What would be shocking would be if arch posted something showing women some respect.
Arch is incapable of showing respect for anything.
dlwhawaii wrote:
Arch is incapable of showing respect for anything.
He is one of our more special case turnips...
mwalsh wrote:
Can always count on you to be a classy whore.
Why you so misogynistic? If she was a guy would you have called him a s**t whore, or just a liar.
At least you show your true colors rather than hide them in a hole.
Why the negative perspective on women? Have something to do with the charges brought against you by a woman?
Your command of English is pathetic like the constant loser you are with your constant obsession and fascination with me.
arch, slither back under your rock.
Architect1776 wrote:
So the prosecutor hugs the witness who just purjered themselves by lying to congress?
It was almost in real time proven everything the s**t whore said was a lie.
Libs are so warped and intellectually dishonest.
I think it would be wisdom for you to withhold final judgement. Others in the know may take the stand under oath regarding what was said
srg wrote:
I think it would be wisdom for you to withhold final judgement. Others in the know may take the stand under oath regarding what was said
Worked real well in the identical trials held in the Soviet Union and N**i Germany.
This whole J** 6th hearing is a total shame. Only hear from Democrat flunkies.
bob44044 wrote:
This whole J** 6th hearing is a total shame. Only hear from Democrat flunkies.
How are you able to totally dismiss the REPUBLICAN WITNESSES? LOL
bob44044 wrote:
This whole J** 6th hearing is a total shame. Only hear from Democrat flunkies.
Most of the witnesses have been repubs however.
I'm conservative on some issues - immigration for one, liberal on others - medicine in the US - the latter because I'm a peer cancer councilor at a major teaching hospital and have seen what insurers often get away with.
The two ladies are hugging because the young lady, as Liz Chaney, have shown a great deal of courage. The thing that seems to escape many of you on this forum in an attempt to discredit the investigation is bravery in the Republicans that have testified. In many cases, they know, that their future as a Republican official, elected representative and so on is finished given the diatribes from the former President and his minions. Doors that would have been open for Cassidy are now close forever; but she had the guts to tell what she heard and experience and for what - ridicule, being called a whore by one of our more temperamental members of this forum. Liz Chaney is well behind in the polls to be re-elected. If you disagree with Trump, you suffer his wrath. The last person to have perfect thought was crucified 2,000 years ago - that's my view as a Christian.
This again is not a trial; it's an investigation. Many of you say it's a sham because the nominated Republicans were not chosen to serve. But surely you know if a guy like Jordon was on the committee he would do everything to be an obstacle; since he was one of the people seeking a pardon - should he be on the investigation? I think not.
So rant away - my 2 cents; I do find it amusing that some of you on both the far left and far right are so narrow-minded, you could use a business envelope as a hat.
Have a Happy 4th of July. God Bless this country!
rwoodvira wrote:
I'm conservative on some issues - immigration for one, liberal on others - medicine in the US - the latter because I'm a peer cancer councilor at a major teaching hospital and have seen what insurers often get away with.
The two ladies are hugging because the young lady, as Liz Chaney, have shown a great deal of courage. The thing that seems to escape many of you on this forum in an attempt to discredit the investigation is bravery in the Republicans that have testified. In many cases, they know, that their future as a Republican official, elected representative and so on is finished given the diatribes from the former President and his minions. Doors that would have been open for Cassidy are now close forever; but she had the guts to tell what she heard and experience and for what - ridicule, being called a whore by one of our more temperamental members of this forum. Liz Chaney is well behind in the polls to be re-elected. If you disagree with Trump, you suffer his wrath. The last person to have perfect thought was crucified 2,000 years ago - that's my view as a Christian.
This again is not a trial; it's an investigation. Many of you say it's a sham because the nominated Republicans were not chosen to serve. But surely you know if a guy like Jordon was on the committee he would do everything to be an obstacle; since he was one of the people seeking a pardon - should he be on the investigation? I think not.
So rant away - my 2 cents; I do find it amusing that some of you on both the far left and far right are so narrow-minded, you could use a business envelope as a hat.
Have a Happy 4th of July. God Bless this country!
I'm conservative on some issues - immigration for ... (
show quote)
It seems that you missed the point of my post, it's about the image and what it projects.
While I don't agree with some of his politics, he is one of a few here that really can be worth reading, unlike yourself.
Racmanaz wrote:
It seems that you missed the point of my post, it's about the image and what it projects.
To me what it says is exactly what rwoodvira says it says. I would guess that testifying was traumatic for the young woman.
thom w wrote:
To me what it says is exactly what rwoodvira says it says. I would guess that testifying was traumatic for the young woman.
Maybe so, but that image does not help her.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.