btbg wrote:
Yes, and you would be one of those people. Remember, you said yourself that this is a fact finding committee. So, why have they not talked to the four people who were in the room when Trump called for the National Guard? Because if what they say is true then Trump couldn't possibly have been plotting to o*******w the government.
And, why haven't they talked to the secret service agents who say Hutchinson is lying? I could go on, but what's the point. They clearly aren't looking for the facts. So, who is really blinded to the evidence. The committee is who is blinded. They won't even look for the facts.
Hutchinson was the last straw. She clearly is not telling the t***h, and Cheney hugged her after her testimony. Is that what a true fact finding committee member would do? Of course not. They would have talked to the people who were actually present when the events supposedly happened. But, they haven't done that, have they? So, who is blinded to the evidence and isn't looking for the t***h? Come on, just be honest. The fact finding committee isn't looking for facts, unless of course those facts support their narrative.
That isn't fact finding. Believe what you will about Trump, but at least be honest about the committee. They are clearly not on a fact finding mission or they would be trying to find the facts. And Raskin admitted to Jake Tapper on Wednesday that they have not even attempted to talk to the Secret Service agents that were there during what Hutchinson claimed happened. Of course they deny what she said, so the committee has chosen not to speak to them. Does that sound like fact finding to you?
You generally don't answer questions, but just try answering one of these questions. You might begin to see the t***h.
Yes, and you would be one of those people. Remembe... (
show quote)
And of course they would want to talk to the republicans who say that one of those secret service agents is a political appointee and has lied in the past to protect his bosses.