Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
‘All hearsay’: Attorney teaches Jim Jordan a hard lesson about spreading misinformation
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Jul 1, 2022 16:29:28   #
mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area
 
btbg wrote:
Yes, and you would be one of those people. Remember, you said yourself that this is a fact finding committee. So, why have they not talked to the four people who were in the room when Trump called for the National Guard? Because if what they say is true then Trump couldn't possibly have been plotting to o*******w the government.

And, why haven't they talked to the secret service agents who say Hutchinson is lying? I could go on, but what's the point. They clearly aren't looking for the facts. So, who is really blinded to the evidence. The committee is who is blinded. They won't even look for the facts.

Hutchinson was the last straw. She clearly is not telling the t***h, and Cheney hugged her after her testimony. Is that what a true fact finding committee member would do? Of course not. They would have talked to the people who were actually present when the events supposedly happened. But, they haven't done that, have they? So, who is blinded to the evidence and isn't looking for the t***h? Come on, just be honest. The fact finding committee isn't looking for facts, unless of course those facts support their narrative.

That isn't fact finding. Believe what you will about Trump, but at least be honest about the committee. They are clearly not on a fact finding mission or they would be trying to find the facts. And Raskin admitted to Jake Tapper on Wednesday that they have not even attempted to talk to the Secret Service agents that were there during what Hutchinson claimed happened. Of course they deny what she said, so the committee has chosen not to speak to them. Does that sound like fact finding to you?

You generally don't answer questions, but just try answering one of these questions. You might begin to see the t***h.
Yes, and you would be one of those people. Remembe... (show quote)


And of course they would want to talk to the republicans who say that one of those secret service agents is a political appointee and has lied in the past to protect his bosses.

Reply
Jul 1, 2022 16:49:32   #
btbg
 
mjmoore17 wrote:
And of course they would want to talk to the republicans who say that one of those secret service agents is a political appointee and has lied in the past to protect his bosses.


They can talk to whomever they wish. My point is that they are not a fact finding commission as they are not looking for facts. They are looking for "evidence" to support their narrative. If they were looking for facts the secret service agents would have been some of the first people they talked to.

Reply
Jul 1, 2022 16:59:45   #
mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area
 
btbg wrote:
They can talk to whomever they wish. My point is that they are not a fact finding commission as they are not looking for facts. They are looking for "evidence" to support their narrative. If they were looking for facts the secret service agents would have been some of the first people they talked to.


They did, some of them twice.

Reply
 
 
Jul 1, 2022 17:54:29   #
Texcaster Loc: Queensland
 
One thing we all can bet on is that Cassidy Hutchinson was not involved in any J** 6 'drug deal' Trump and Ginny Thomas and the pardon seekers were cooking up.

Well, er, um, ah, a former secret serviceman, a 'Barge Arse' detail member said ... "He's way too enormous to climb into the front."

Reply
Jul 1, 2022 19:23:30   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
mjmoore17 wrote:
They did, some of them twice.


Like they did with the f**e Russia collision conspiracy manufactured by Democrats and Hillary?

Reply
Jul 1, 2022 19:26:56   #
mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area
 
Racmanaz wrote:
Like they did with the f**e Russia collision conspiracy manufactured by Democrats and Hillary?


Like they did to the Committee on J*** 6th. Stupidly trying to change the subject.

Reply
Jul 1, 2022 19:29:24   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
Fotoartist wrote:
Why not take testimony from the actual people who were there and forget all the f–––ing BS nonsense?

You know why this isn't being done? Because it's creating a phony feeding frenzy for people like you and 9v.


What I'm hoping is that when this is all over you will be too embarrassed to post here anymore, like the guy who kept swearing that the number of c***d deaths would never hit 500.

Reply
 
 
Jul 1, 2022 19:31:59   #
mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area
 
thom w wrote:
What I'm hoping is that when this is all over you will be too embarrassed to post here anymore, like the guy who kept swearing that the number of c***d deaths would never hit 500.


I am hoping that again Drump will be proven to be a lying POS.

Reply
Jul 1, 2022 19:34:23   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
mjmoore17 wrote:
I am hoping that again Drump will be proven to be a lying POS.


The problem is "proven to whom". There are many here that wouldn't believe anything bad about Trump, if they saw him do it. You can show them facts, but you can't make them accept them.

Reply
Jul 1, 2022 19:39:09   #
mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area
 
thom w wrote:
The problem is "proven to whom". There are many here that wouldn't believe anything bad about Trump, if they saw him do it. You can show them facts, but you can't make them accept them.


Too true.

Reply
Jul 1, 2022 19:49:12   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
mjmoore17 wrote:
Like they did to the Committee on J*** 6th. Stupidly trying to change the subject.


Lol you can't answer the question because you are a hypocrite.

Reply
 
 
Jul 1, 2022 20:07:59   #
mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area
 
Racmanaz wrote:
Lol you can't answer the question because you are a hypocrite.


The question is easy, the reason for it is even easier. You are still changing subject to deflect from original, I will not have apart in it.

Reply
Jul 1, 2022 20:15:19   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
mjmoore17 wrote:
The question is easy, the reason for it is even easier. You are still changing subject to deflect from original, I will not have apart in it.


Lol yet you still refuse to answer.

Reply
Jul 1, 2022 20:55:28   #
btbg
 
mjmoore17 wrote:
They did, some of them twice.


No, they didn't. Raskin admitted to Jake Tapper that they never even talked to the two secret service agents. They have also never talked to any of the people who were in the room with Trump who say he did call for National Guard troops on 1/4. They aren't even trying to find the t***h, they are simply trying to manufacture "facts" that fit their narrative. They have botched it so badly that no conservative is ever going to believe anything the committee says, even if it is the t***h, because they have totally destroyed any credibility that they might have had.

Reply
Jul 1, 2022 20:58:11   #
btbg
 
mjmoore17 wrote:
Like they did to the Committee on J*** 6th. Stupidly trying to change the subject.


It's the same people involved in the 1*6 c*******e that were involved in the Russia crap. Remember Schiff spent months saying he had the proof of the Russia collusion. Well, he's saying exactly the same thing now. Once Schiff was placed on the committee that was all it took to show that they weren't a fact finding group. When they put Hutchinson on the stand without even making an attempt to verify her story that took away any doubt. My wife, who never v**ed for Trump either time is now on board and hoping he runs in 2024. That's how badly the Democrats have screwed up if their goal was really to discredit Trump.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.