TriX wrote:
Just curious, what are your medical/epidemiological credentisls and the sources of your information.
I just found what I was looking for on the Internet! I didn't actually mention any in-depth analysis on epidemics, certainly nothing that requires credentials to know.
I have some backgroumd in medical research, I've done it professionally, before the WWW. I can read and understand a physician's medication insert! But I just read a lot. I wouldn't try to practice medicine.
I've read the CDC guidelines. And the states, for the vast majority of the p******c, did report according to the CDC guidlines! That is according the Johns Hopkins central repository on C***D stats and information.
Really, everything is in plain view. It's just disguised! For instance, I can tell a lot about a person by what he's done with his life, how his children turned out, his body language, having a conversation, to a pretty in-depth degree, such that I've been accused of using surveillance equipment to spy on people I've never seen before!
What I find intuitively obvious others perceive as impossible for me to know! I'm like that with everything. But I make good use of it! I have 2 million+ online readers in 150+ countries!
I run a think tank that advises heads of state, church leaders, corporate and institutional; leaders, and on occasion the general public. There's nothing that special about me. I've just been working at or a long time.
T***h is free! It's like gold. You just have to dig it up. Sometimes you get lucky, others it takes a while. But I know where to look, because I'm an independent research scientist!
I do it a lot, so I'm good at it. Anyone can question anything, but it shouldn't be without some counterpoint! And I just read the rules, and my op borders on political content! But I can't edit it anymore. I hope I don't get banned!