SoHillGuy Loc: Washington

You will need a pair of anaglyph glasses to view in 3D. (red & cyan lenses.)

Photo Credit: Victoria Borodinova.



3D conversion by SoHillGuy.

3D

(Download)

Original

(Download)

JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.

I see lots of depth in this one.

As I have commented before about false depth, there is an appearance of planes of depth, much like a paper cutout scene.

But, still a nice photo.

mjc925 Loc: SF Bay Area

I really like this one, it somehow seems more than the sum of its parts. On the surface it is just a nice image of a pretty girl half naked in the woods, but it comes together for me very well. I like the plants in the foreground, the stream and trees in the background, the color and soft lighting/exposure is very nice. I really like the small tree right next to her, the flower in her hand and hair. Her outfit is simple, yet fitting. The pose is nice. The model just "fits" with the scene, both physically, as she is naturally beautiful and the emotional part of the scene as she seems at rest, reserved, quiet, but beautiful and deep. I like she is looking away in thought. Only tiny thing I don't like is the cut stump bottom right and ,maybe frame it so she isn't dead center, but really, that is nitpicking on my part just to show I am being objective! Nicely done, thanks for sharing.

SoHillGuy Loc: Washington

***
Yes, now that you have drawn my attention to the stump It is distracting.

Manglesphoto Loc: 70 miles south of St.Louis

Very lovely young lady!!!
In agreement with all comments!!

dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida

Most truly 3D well done... and with her sitting there and my glasses the Ma-Bell of 1970's Bell System "Reach Out And Touch Someone" applies here. Wish I could watch the Andy Warhol 3d movies again full screen eating popcorn and drinking cola.

Regarding JohnFrim comment: 3D and it perfection is "in the eye of the beholder" ... i like this one.

SoHillGuy Loc: Washington

SoHillGuy Loc: Washington

***
Thank you for commenting.

Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan

That's because it is a conversion from a 2D. So in this case the 3D does not enhance the cup size (not trying to be funny). I could supply an example of this phenomenon that I have experienced in my own work.

Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana

I like the original but don’t have anaglyph glasses.

mjc925 Loc: SF Bay Area

Well, somehow I didn't even notice this image was not the OP, but the idea of posting it was to discuss the conversion to 3D. My fault for just assuming something and not reading all the text. Still like the actual image, but that is what I was commenting on. The 3D effect I am indifferent on.

Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan

As a side note, I compete in 3D photography and I totally agree with your comments as they apply to the image and they do apply to 3D images as well as 2D. Only in 3D the depth in most cases is the most important element. When you can get everything working for you then you have a winner.

There is nothing preventing the OP from cropping out the stump.