Solution to Gun Violence (Page 10): :sm24: :sm24: :sm24: :sm24:...

wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma

cwp3420 wrote:

That’s a shame. That was the best job you ever had in your 76 miserable years. Did your wife leave you before or after you were fired?

wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma

thom w wrote:

If "good guys with guns" kept track of their weapons, how would they ever reach the black market?

are you serious??

Bill 45

cwp3420 wrote:

You just said there weren’t any cheap handguns out there? And where do you think you’ll find a Glock for $100. Why didn’t you buy one? Credit so bad you can’t spend $100 on a pistol?

Back in the middle 1960s I had a Browning P-35(High Power, to you). After a year or so, the novelty of owning a handgun was go so I sold it off. After owning one I don't care to own another one. Also when buying a firearm it cash up front not credit, that way I don't any money problems later on.

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

Triple G wrote:

I can’t even imagine what the actuarial formula would be to calculate risk pooled premiums. Certainly, the assault type weapons would have the highest premium. Plus how do you figure damages? How much for 22 lives in one incident?

Rest assured the premiums will be high

lbrande

DennyT wrote:

Rest assured the premiums will be high

Hence, a violation of the 2nd Amendment.

Checkmate Loc: Southern California

BooIsMyCat wrote:

See.... told you that you don't care about children being mass murdered. You are more interested in it being cost prohibitive.

Tell that to the families of the 22 who just died in Uvlade.

Just another hypochristian!

Rave on Brandon. Typical brown shirted Demokrap response by an atheist AH who doesn't care about anybody but him/herself.

BooIsMyCat Loc: Somewhere

Checkmate wrote:

Rave on Brandon. Typical brown shirted Demokrap response by an atheist AH who doesn't care about anybody but him/herself.

I don't care about anyone who would fight more to keep their gun than to save a child from mass murder.
You obviously, don't. The AH is staring at YOU in the mirror.

Bill 45

Checkmate wrote:

Rave on Brandon. Typical brown shirted Demokrap response by an atheist AH who doesn't care about anybody but him/herself.

What?

srt101fan

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbXTDuwSVkk

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

lbrande wrote:

Hence, a violation of the 2nd Amendment.

As much a I think insurance for gun ownership is a dumb idea I don’t see it as violation of 2A.

Anyone that would want, again can buy insurance x why would this violate 2 A when back ground checks don’t?

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

BooIsMyCat wrote:

I don't care about anyone who would fight more to keep their gun than to save a child from mass murder.
You obviously, don't. The AH is staring at YOU in the mirror.

Non sequitar
Are you saying “my “ wanting to keep my guns endangers a kid .

Plain stupid statement.

You are just the opposite extreme from those want no solution other than theirs.

BooIsMyCat Loc: Somewhere

DennyT wrote:

Non sequitar
Are you saying “my “ wanting to keep my guns endangers a kid .

Plain stupid statement.

You are just the opposite extreme from those want no solution other than theirs.

I'm saying YOU would look the other way rather than sit down and figure out a reasonable, working solution.
I'm saying that your vitriol towards people who want to curb gun use DOES in deed endanger kids.

Is that so hard to understand?

Obviously, being that you don't have all the marbles normal people have, you fail to see and/or understand that I a NOT against owning a gun.... have stated multiple times before that I own guns.

I simply feel we need ACTION, not INACTION regarding mass murders.

The ideas put forth by you and others here, that someone else put in your head, are not only stupid but add danger to an already out of control situation. One entrance/exit! Ludicrous! Giving teachers guns! Asinine! Blaming it all on mental health! Stupidity beyond belief!

But hey!, let's go out and stop a******n.

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

BooIsMyCat wrote:

I'm saying YOU would look the other way rather than sit down and figure out a reasonable, working solution.
I'm saying that your vitriol towards people who want to curb gun use DOES in deed endanger kids.

Don’t lie! I have no vitriol to anyone wanting to curb “ violance”. But your very words “ curb gun use “ shows you really want all guns gone instead of finding a solution to gun “ violence “
In other words your no better that the guns nuts that aren’t really looking for a solution. You are only looking for “ solution” of all guns gone. y”

Is that so hard to understand?

Quote:

The ideas put forth by you.

I doubt seriously you even know what I suggested do yoi? Answer honestly .

Then go stick you head under a cold shower and come back and we can have an “ intelligent “ discussion.

lbrande

DennyT wrote:

As much a I think insurance for gun ownership is a dumb idea I don’t see it as violation of 2A.

Anyone that would want, again can buy insurance x why would this violate 2 A when back ground checks don’t?

Requiring insurance to exercise a right is an infringement by the government. Requiring insurance would also probably be a violation of the 14th amendment as it would force exclusion of an entire class of persons by making the exercise of the right cost prohibited. FYI, CCW insurance costs well over $300/yr.
It would be the same if you required insurance to exercise your right to free speech

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

lbrande wrote:

Requiring insurance to exercise a right is an infringement by the government. Requiring insurance would also probably be a violation of the 14th amendment as it would force exclusion of an entire class of persons by making the exercise of the right cost prohibited. FYI, CCW insurance costs well over $300/yr.
It would be the same if you required insurance to exercise your right to free speech

I agree that it is a violation of the 14 but not the second.