"Overturning Roe would be disastrous for the U.S. military." (Page 2): Try educating yourself. Some of the states are passing excessively restrictive a******n bills, where they're...

Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast

Architect1776 wrote:

Who cares.
That is their "CHOICE".
None of your business nor mine.
Do not like it, move there and v**e for murder.
But it has no effect upon you in any way.
Even if you live in Oklahoma go out of state, which today is as easy as going to McDonald's. There will be plenty of murder and body parts shops across the borders.

Try educating yourself.

Some of the states are passing excessively restrictive a******n bills, where they're making it illegal to travel to another state to obtain an a******n.

Some states are taking enforcement of those restrictive new a******n laws out of the the states hands by putting bounty provisions into the laws, and those bounty provisions aren't limited to within the state borders. If anyone assists a woman in any way to travel outside of the state to obtain an a******n, those individuals are subject to bounty h****rs.

When it comes to the US Military members requiring an a******n, not all of them will be granted leave to travel off base and out of state to try to obtain an a******n, which in some states requires multiple visits to comply with state laws for pre-a******n screening and counseling.

Let's not forget that the US Military has a huge rape cover-up problem! Often the immediate CO will be the rapist, or will be covering up for the actual rapist on their base.

So, NO, it's "not as easy as going to McDonald's"!

Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast

Architect1776 wrote:

Also last I heard there is the morning after pill.
Rape is evil and needs to be addressed everywhere more strongly.
There is no intelligent reason to wait 9 months and do a partial birth murder except to sell body parts.

Roe v. Wade ISN'T about late term a******ns!

When are you going to learn that simple fact?

Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida

Shutterbug1697 wrote:

Try educating yourself. br br Some of the states... (show quote)

The anti a******n people are busy trying to convince themselves that the Alito decision will not adversely affect the lives of millions. Their religious beliefs override logic.

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

Frank T wrote:

Archie, you cannot be more wrong. How does "... (show quote)

Yes they do.
And what about the baby and its right to life.
People are charged with double homicide when a pregnant female is k**led.
How do morons reconcile that?

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

Architect1776 wrote:

Yes they do.
And what about the baby and its right to life.
People are charged with double homicide when a pregnant female is k**led.
How do morons reconcile that?

They can only be charged as you say when the fetus reaches viability. If a woman is murdered and she's six weeks pregnant there is only one homicide count.
By the way Archie, the preponderance of evidence points to you being the moron on this site.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Kmgw9v wrote:

The “vast majority” of American, including woman” are pro choice.

Lol No they are not.

Triple G

Racmanaz wrote:

Lol No they are not.

66% constitutes a majority.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1264585/favorability-toward-legalization-of-a******n/

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Triple G wrote:

66% constitutes a majority.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1264585/favorability-toward-legalization-of-a******n/

BS, almost everybody I have asked said they were pro-life with exceptions for certain issues like rape.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Triple G wrote:

66% constitutes a majority.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1264585/favorability-toward-legalization-of-a******n/

Also, the majority of Americans opposed the ACA before it was passed yet you still believed the majority was wrong and the Democrats were right. You are such a flipping hypocrite. Lol

Triple G

Racmanaz wrote:

BS, almost everybody I have asked said they were pro-life with exceptions for certain issues like rape.

Your canvassing is not a statistically significant sample and your question was probably not worded or presented in a non-biased manner. If you asked me if I was pro-a******n, I'd say no, but that's my personal belief. I would not impose my religious belief on pro-choice people because I believe in freedom of (and from) religion.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Triple G wrote:

Your canvassing is not a statistically significant sample and your question was probably not worded or presented in a non-biased manner. If you asked me if I was pro-a******n, I'd say no, but that's my personal belief. I would not impose my religious belief on pro-choice people because I believe in freedom of (and from) religion.

Lol BS, at least I know what people believe by personally asking them instead of relying on some website on a controversial issue as this one, especially when you don't know how the questions were asked

It's not about imposing any religious believe on anyone, it's about saving the lives of unborn children. It's murder whether you feel like it is or not. Also, being pro-life is pro-science.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Triple G wrote:

Your canvassing is not a statistically significant sample and your question was probably not worded or presented in a non-biased manner. If you asked me if I was pro-a******n, I'd say no, but that's my personal belief. I would not impose my religious belief on pro-choice people because I believe in freedom of (and from) religion.

95% of biologists affirm that life begins at fertilization. Since you like polls.

Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast

Racmanaz wrote:

BS, almost everybody I have asked said they were pro-life with exceptions for certain issues like rape.

You are NOT talking to the MAJORITY of the people in the United States, you're only talking to your small inner circle.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Shutterbug1697 wrote:

You are NOT talking to the MAJORITY of the people in the United States, you're only talking to your small inner circle.

Can you prove that? How would YOU know who I am talking to? Also, No Pollster is talking to the MAJORITY of the people in the United States, it's always a tiny fraction of the population.

Texcaster Loc: Queensland

Racmanaz wrote:

Lol No they are not.

Trump Fears Wrath of 'Suburban Women' Over Roe Loss Could Torpedo 2024 Chances: Donald Trump has been uncharacteristically quiet about the expected decision on Roe.

Former President Donald Trump is worried about his chances in the 2024 e******n amid the wrath of “suburban women” furious about the expected gutting of Roe v. Wade, sources have told The Rolling Stone.

“Suburban women have been a recurring concern” for Trump, including during the 2020 campaign, when his “smarter advisers were sounding the alarm to him about how he was losing suburbs,” said a person familiar with the issue, according to the magazine.

Washington Post journalists Bob Woodward and Robert Costa reported in their book “Peril,” that former Attorney General William Barr warned Trump several months before the 2020 e******n that he was alienating suburban v**ers (not just women).

“This e******n is about the suburbs,” Barr told Trump, noting that he already had his more extreme base of supporters behind him.

“There are a lot of people out there, Independents and Republicans in the suburbs of the critical states that think you’re an asshole,” Barr explained, according to Peril. “They think you act like an asshole and you got to, you got to start taking that into account.”