We always knew the media was biased, and this is proof of it:...

LinksUp

https://www.dailywire.com/news/he-looked-at-the-data-and-discovered-the-b*m-narrative-about-cops-was-a-lie-then-he-was-fired

From the conclusion,

"Most of us don’t understand how deeply c*********d our news sources have become. Most of us have no idea that we are suffused with fictions and half-t***hs that sound sort of believable and are shielded from scrutiny by people whose job is to challenge them. This is true, above all, of my fellow liberals, who assume that only Republicans complain about the mainstream media. But this is not a partisan issue. This is a We The People issue” (Emphasis added)

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

LinksUp wrote:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/he-looked-at-the-da... (show quote)

It probably should be, but Republicans have made it partisan. Never take a knife to a gun fight. I don't watch Rachel Maddow much because of hyperbole.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

thom w wrote:

It probably should be, but Republicans have made it partisan. Never take a knife to a gun fight. I don't watch Rachel Maddow much because of hyperbole.

Seems to me the data backs up B*M. His interpretation does not.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

thom w wrote:

Seems to me the data backs up B*M. His interpretation does not.

It may seem that way to you but the data does not back up B*M.

LinksUp

thom w wrote:

Seems to me the data backs up B*M. His interpretation does not.

Since we now have to have a Biology degree to answer the question What is a women, image what qualifications you must have to interpret this data. I’m positive you have none of the necessary qualifications to provide any answer to counter that of an actual expert on the subject.

btbg

thom w wrote:

It probably should be, but Republicans have made it partisan. Never take a knife to a gun fight. I don't watch Rachel Maddow much because of hyperbole.

Republicans have pointed out the falsehoods that the media perpetrate. If that's making it partisan that shows just how corrupt democrats and the media are, because pointing out the t***h should not be considered partisan.

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

LinksUp wrote:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/he-looked-at-the-da... (show quote)

Until alternative sources like Rush Limbaugh we deep down knew that we were being lied to by the likes of Cronkite.
Since President Trump, the f**e news has dropped all pretense of objectivity.
They openly admit that they are 100% in the tank for the DNC and will cover for them no matter what.
That is why they are losing readership/viewers in droves and the amazing rise of organizations like Newsmax becaue America wants the t***h.

FrumCA

Architect1776 wrote:

Until alternative sources like Rush Limbaugh we deep down knew that we were being lied to by the likes of Cronkite.
Since President Trump, the f**e news has dropped all pretense of objectivity.
They openly admit that they are 100% in the tank for the DNC and will cover for them no matter what.
That is why they are losing readership/viewers in droves and the amazing rise of organizations like Newsmax becaue America wants the t***h.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

thom w wrote:

It probably should be, but Republicans have made it partisan. Never take a knife to a gun fight. I don't watch Rachel Maddow much because of hyperbole.

The lie that cops in general are out looking to k**l young black men for no other reason than being black and the media buyin and promotion of that lie is what made it partisan.

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

Blurryeyed wrote:

The lie that cops in general are out looking to k**l young black men for no other reason than being black and the media buyin and promotion of that lie is what made it partisan.

One of many many things.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

Architect1776 wrote:

Until alternative sources like Rush Limbaugh we deep down knew that we were being lied to by the likes of Cronkite.
Since President Trump, the f**e news has dropped all pretense of objectivity.
They openly admit that they are 100% in the tank for the DNC and will cover for them no matter what.
That is why they are losing readership/viewers in droves and the amazing rise of organizations like Newsmax becaue America wants the t***h.

You may have bought what Limbaugh had to sell, but he said he was just entertainment.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

Blurryeyed wrote:

The lie that cops in general are out looking to k**l young black men for no other reason than being black and the media buyin and promotion of that lie is what made it partisan.

That's a lie that I've never heard. I can imagine it being said at a protest when emotions are running wild, but the problem is there seems to be some who do think that way. I imagine they are a small minority, but a small minority of cops can cause an awful lot of suffering. The other problem is the blue wall of silence. If you are a "good cop" and you cover for a bad cop, in my book, you just became a bad cop.

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

thom w wrote:

You may have bought what Limbaugh had to sell, but he said he was just entertainment.

You never listened so what do you know?

btbg

thom w wrote:

That's a lie that I've never heard. I can imagine it being said at a protest when emotions are running wild, but the problem is there seems to be some who do think that way. I imagine they are a small minority, but a small minority of cops can cause an awful lot of suffering. The other problem is the blue wall of silence. If you are a "good cop" and you cover for a bad cop, in my book, you just became a bad cop.

You may not have heard that lie, but that's what B*M is claiming. That's why they want to defund the police. And, the data says that unarmed Black men are less likely to be k**led than unarmed white men, so, where is the aledged r****m.