Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Full frame vs aps-c
Page <<first <prev 5 of 7 next> last>>
May 8, 2022 14:17:39   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
The math of a beautiful image is easy: it has twice the megapixels of your current sensor.

Reply
May 8, 2022 14:27:27   #
Tommg
 
and????

Reply
May 8, 2022 16:55:41   #
profbowman Loc: Harrisonburg, VA, USA
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
If your sensor throws away 50% of the frame, how will you ever achieve your potential as a photographer?


If you are referring to setting a full frame sensor to the settings of a crop sensor, then that is correct. I'm with you. Why would one want to do this continuously? But if you mean the crop sensor is throwing away info in a frame, then that is not correct. The frame is smaller for a crop sensor. --Richard

Reply
 
 
May 8, 2022 17:21:01   #
a3dtot Loc: Houston, TX
 
Not really. A full frame camera will have more detail per photo because it is full frame and not 2/3's frame. It the receiver size inside the camera and not the type of lens. Because the image receiver gets more of the image and not just the size of the image or lens correlation. You get more pixels of resolution per image on a full frame.

Reply
May 8, 2022 17:59:28   #
BebuLamar
 
a3dtot wrote:
Not really. A full frame camera will have more detail per photo because it is full frame and not 2/3's frame. It the receiver size inside the camera and not the type of lens. Because the image receiver gets more of the image and not just the size of the image or lens correlation. You get more pixels of resolution per image on a full frame.


Really you think my Nikon Df with its full frame 16MP sensor would have more details than an APS-C of the same make and same time period D7200 with its 24MP APS-C sensor?

Reply
May 8, 2022 18:32:34   #
profbowman Loc: Harrisonburg, VA, USA
 
a3dtot wrote:
Not really. A full frame camera will have more detail per photo because it is full frame and not 2/3's frame. It the receiver size inside the camera and not the type of lens. Because the image receiver gets more of the image and not just the size of the image or lens correlation. You get more pixels of resolution per image on a full frame.


OK, I see what you are saying. But to me saying a sensor is throwing away pixels is a strange way of putting it. The 16:9 sensor also throws away more than a hypothetical circular sensor in which the rectangular one can be inscribed. But I don't know of anyone wanting to make a circular sensor. In fact, with argument, we should have stayed with 4:3 sensors since they cover more area of the circle than does a 16:9 rectangle. --Richard

Reply
May 8, 2022 18:43:37   #
Harry13
 
[quote=billnikon] "then this is a horse of a different color."

I believe that's "a whore of a different color."

That was in common use in the old West to differentiate between black and white whore houses. Or so my sainted old grandmother tells me.

Reply
 
 
May 8, 2022 21:41:27   #
bikinkawboy Loc: north central Missouri
 
And grandmas are never wrong!

Reply
May 8, 2022 21:47:18   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
With the wrong camera, success is probably 99% luck. But with the right camera, it's 100% the photographer.


Reply
May 9, 2022 07:27:23   #
starlifter Loc: Towson, MD
 
Cool answer.

Reply
May 9, 2022 07:29:14   #
BebuLamar
 
Longshadow wrote:


"With the wrong camera, success is probably 99% luck. But with the right camera, it's 100% the photographer."

This is very true. When someone took good pictures with a great camera they tend to claim all the credit for themselves and give the camera no credit at all.

Reply
 
 
May 9, 2022 07:41:36   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
BebuLamar wrote:
"With the wrong camera, success is probably 99% luck. But with the right camera, it's 100% the photographer."

This is very true. When someone took good pictures with a great camera they tend to claim all the credit for themselves and give the camera no credit at all.

Well, if I had a great picture, I couldn't have made it without the help of my camera.

Reply
May 9, 2022 08:44:02   #
MrBob Loc: lookout Mtn. NE Alabama
 
WHY do we insist on pinning everything down to one or the other.... Richard Petty could NOT have done any better on the track with my beetle bug than I could have done in his race car when we were both in our prime... Experience and equipment complement one another... Seems pretty simple to me. 5 pages so far ?

Reply
May 9, 2022 09:01:04   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
There are three responses to a great image: yes, no, or they must have used a mirrorless camera.

Reply
May 9, 2022 09:37:42   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
There are three responses to a great image: yes, no, or they must have used a mirrorless camera.


Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.