Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Main Focus
Page 1 of 2 next>
Apr 22, 2022 15:14:16   #
dsims1960 Loc: Texas
 
How do I get these bird pictures plan and sharp like several other people do. I was shooting with a Nikon d5600 and the lens is a Stigma 100mm-600





Reply
Apr 22, 2022 15:26:09   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Action #1 - ask for help - check

Action #2 - store examples of your current results with original EXIF - incomplete

Are these both your images? Or, one is / one isn't? Or, none, just examples of what is desired?

Show us what you're able to accomplish currently, store the files, for review and discussion.



Reply
Apr 22, 2022 15:41:17   #
dsims1960 Loc: Texas
 
Both of these are pictures I took

Reply
 
 
Apr 22, 2022 15:44:42   #
dsims1960 Loc: Texas
 
I apologize if I’m not posting on this site correctly. Really not sure how it works so if anyone has suggestions please let me know. Because I don’t know what Original EXIF-incomplete means. I’m not a photographer but love taking really good pictures

Reply
Apr 22, 2022 16:29:21   #
Sinewsworn Loc: Port Orchard, WA
 
dsims1960 wrote:
How do I get these bird pictures plan and sharp like several other people do. I was shooting with a Nikon d5600 and the lens is a Stigma 100mm-600


Shutter Speed. Check this forum under different headings for help with this.

Reply
Apr 22, 2022 19:53:21   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
dsims1960 wrote:
I apologize if I’m not posting on this site correctly. Really not sure how it works so if anyone has suggestions please let me know. Because I don’t know what Original EXIF-incomplete means. I’m not a photographer but love taking really good pictures


Digital cameras record data about the date / time / lens / camera / exposure into data stored within the resulting image files, known as EXIF data. When you check the box 'store original' as highlighted above, that image data (EXIF) is available within the attached image file for inspection and discussion.

You can create a <Reply> and re-attach both images as done before, just making sure to 'check' the box to store those files as attachments for inspection of the camera settings in the EXIF.

Reply
Apr 22, 2022 20:20:12   #
dsims1960 Loc: Texas
 
Thanks

Reply
 
 
Apr 22, 2022 20:26:49   #
dsims1960 Loc: Texas
 
Hopefully I posted my message correctly this time. LOL. I see so many other photos that people take and they are so plan and sharp. I was just wondering what I could do. I have the Nikon d5600 and used the sigma 150mm-600mm lens for these pictures


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Apr 22, 2022 21:46:43   #
BassmanBruce Loc: Middle of the Mitten
 
Hi dsims, it looks to me like you are off to pretty good start. I hope I understood your intent correctly and hope this helps.
I’m no expert but here are some of the things I do when shooting birds.
I usually try to keep the sun and wind somewhere behind me and shoot within a few hours of dawn or dusk. I always try to shoot when full sun is on at least one eye and I try to get that eye as the center of focus.
I almost always use a tripod and gimbal and if the bird will cooperate I use a 2second delay on shutter release.
(A boatload of good photogs vehemently disagree with this strategy but it works for me)
Get Closer! I use a hide when I can. You almost can’t get close enough and if bird feeders are in your repertoire I say use them.
The more you learn about the exposure triangle the better you’re shots will be.
Have fun and keep posting!

Reply
Apr 22, 2022 21:48:15   #
dsims1960 Loc: Texas
 
Thanks!!

Reply
Apr 22, 2022 21:54:34   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
dsims1960 wrote:
Hopefully I posted my message correctly this time. LOL. I see so many other photos that people take and they are so plan and sharp. I was just wondering what I could do. I have the Nikon d5600 and used the sigma 150mm-600mm lens for these pictures


You posted the images exactly as needed. Thank you. Below are an analysis of the EXIF data as a basis of discussion. For the two I looked at, as well as the third example, the most pressing issue is to get closer to the subject. All the exposure parameters are exactly / almost exactly as I'd use too for similar subjects.

When comparing your images to others, you need to recognize some / most / all these technical aspects apply to their work:

1) They were physically closer to their subject.
2) They had a longer effective focal length for their lens, even longer than your longest 600mm.
3) They captured in RAW.
4) They had a higher resolution camera than your 24MP D5600.
5) They processed their images using the most advanced software and sharpening / noise reduction techniques.
6) They increased the pixel resolution of their images on their computer.
7) They used overall sharper lenses, such as primes. And / or, they identified and used the sharpest overall aperture for their specific lens used.
8) They used some of the lighting ideas presented by BassmanBruce, above, such as having the sun positioned behind them so the subject is well-lit and facing into the light when facing directly toward the camera.

As said, everything about your settings are appropriate for sharply focused and well-exposed images. Your example results show these well-considered settings in practice. Now, work on your physical approach and subject selection so that you are closer to your subjects. Find a good location with lots of action and sit and wait patiently for the wildlife to arrive. It might take an hour. It might take 4 hours.


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
 
 
Apr 22, 2022 21:58:19   #
dsims1960 Loc: Texas
 
Thank you very much for your help. Very much appreciated. What is a better camera that isn’t outrageous?

Reply
Apr 22, 2022 22:03:44   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
dsims1960 wrote:
Thank you very much for your help. Very much appreciated. What is a better camera that isn’t outrageous?


There's nothing wrong with your current camera, certainly not at an industry standard 24MP in a DX format. The only way to get more effective pixels are $3000+ ideas. Getting closer would be a lot cheaper.

Reply
Apr 22, 2022 22:04:52   #
dsims1960 Loc: Texas
 
I appreciate that!

Reply
Apr 22, 2022 22:16:54   #
Hip Coyote
 
dsims1960 wrote:
I appreciate that!


That was some serious work on Chg_Canon's part...excellent advice. No go to school!

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.