B.O. tells us not to believe what we saw happen: “Roughly 40 percent of the country appears convinced that the current President was elected fraudulently and that the e******n was...

Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan

“Roughly 40 percent of the country appears convinced that the current President was elected fraudulently and that the e******n was r****d,” Barack Obama said last week as he called for more censorship of social media. 40% is not a fringe group of extremists. It is a large segment of the population. So, 2 out of every 5 people you meet believe the e******n was r****d. That’s fairly mainstream thinking, and yet Barack Obama wants any mention of the e******n being r****d, scrubbed from the internet.

Let’s set aside the mail-in b****ts, and no v**er ID for a moment, and focus solely on two things that we all know actually happened; social media censoring the true H****r B***n laptop story, and social media spreading the false claim that Donald Trump called dead American soldiers in France “losers” and “suckers”. Both of those stories dropped within 2 months of e******n day, and every social media platform allowed the false Trump story based on an unverified unnamed source, to run through their platforms like wildfire. There was no proof, there was no corroboration; in fact, 21 people who were with Donald Trump in France, went on record and denied the story outright. Yet that false story was allowed to spread on social media. Conversely, the H****r B***n laptop story which the New York Post verified before running it, was taken down from social media within hours, based on the claim that it had not been authenticated, even though they knew it had been.

Those two stories are all you need to know that the 2020 P**********l e******n was r****d. If you censor every negative story about Joe Biden and spread every negative story about Donald Trump, you create a complete imbalance of information that will alter the outcome of the e******n. 16 percent of the people who v**ed for Biden, said if they had known about the H****r B***n laptop story, they would not have v**ed for him – that comes out to 12.9 million v**es – over 5 million more than the difference in the e******n. And here we have former President Obama claiming that the e******n was not r****d, and then calling for expanding one of the mechanisms they used to rig the e******n – selective censorship – arguing that it should be done to promote democracy. The Democrats live in their delusional world where they tell each other they are the only party who supports democracy which gives them the arrogance to act anti-democratically and rig our e******ns in the name of democracy because doing so ensured that the so-called pro-democracy party, their party, wins.

By: Judd Garrett, Objectivity is the Objective, April 20, 2022

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

Fotoartist wrote:

“Roughly 40 percent of the country appears convinced that the current President was elected fraudulently and that the e******n was r****d,” Barack Obama said last week as he called for more censorship of social media. 40% is not a fringe group of extremists. It is a large segment of the population. So, 2 out of every 5 people you meet believe the e******n was r****d. That’s fairly mainstream thinking, and yet Barack Obama wants any mention of the e******n being r****d, scrubbed from the internet.

Let’s set aside the mail-in b****ts, and no v**er ID for a moment, and focus solely on two things that we all know actually happened; social media censoring the true H****r B***n laptop story, and social media spreading the false claim that Donald Trump called dead American soldiers in France “losers” and “suckers”. Both of those stories dropped within 2 months of e******n day, and every social media platform allowed the false Trump story based on an unverified unnamed source, to run through their platforms like wildfire. There was no proof, there was no corroboration; in fact, 21 people who were with Donald Trump in France, went on record and denied the story outright. Yet that false story was allowed to spread on social media. Conversely, the H****r B***n laptop story which the New York Post verified before running it, was taken down from social media within hours, based on the claim that it had not been authenticated, even though they knew it had been.

Those two stories are all you need to know that the 2020 P**********l e******n was r****d. If you censor every negative story about Joe Biden and spread every negative story about Donald Trump, you create a complete imbalance of information that will alter the outcome of the e******n. 16 percent of the people who v**ed for Biden, said if they had known about the H****r B***n laptop story, they would not have v**ed for him – that comes out to 12.9 million v**es – over 5 million more than the difference in the e******n. And here we have former President Obama claiming that the e******n was not r****d, and then calling for expanding one of the mechanisms they used to rig the e******n – selective censorship – arguing that it should be done to promote democracy. The Democrats live in their delusional world where they tell each other they are the only party who supports democracy which gives them the arrogance to act anti-democratically and rig our e******ns in the name of democracy because doing so ensured that the so-called pro-democracy party, their party, wins.

By: Judd Garrett, Objectivity is the Objective, April 20, 2022

“Roughly 40 percent of the country appears convinc... (show quote)

I can remember when the word, censorship, was a bad word in America, that censorship itself was not to be tolerated. Americans wanted to know what was HONESTLY going on and h**ed censorship. Of course due to the lying corrupt Left Wingers censorship is now a very popular word and one that they want to be actually used to promote ONLY the ideas of the Left Wing.

Dennis

granbob Loc: SW Wisc; E Iowa; W Illinois

And if you read it here, you know it must be true.

hondo812 Loc: Massachusetts

dennis2146 wrote:

I can remember when the word, censorship, was a bad word in America, that censorship itself was not to be tolerated. Americans wanted to know what was HONESTLY going on and h**ed censorship. Of course due to the lying corrupt Left Wingers censorship is now a very popular word and one that they want to be actually used to promote ONLY the ideas of the Left Wing.

Dennis

Censorship is a byproduct of snowflakes melting.

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

hondo812 wrote:

Censorship is a byproduct of snowflakes melting.

Well then let's hope they melt into oblivion or at least the local sewer.

Dennis

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

Fotoartist wrote:

“Roughly 40 percent of the country appears convinced that the current President was elected fraudulently and that the e******n was r****d,” Barack Obama said last week as he called for more censorship of social media. 40% is not a fringe group of extremists. It is a large segment of the population. So, 2 out of every 5 people you meet believe the e******n was r****d. That’s fairly mainstream thinking, and yet Barack Obama wants any mention of the e******n being r****d, scrubbed from the internet.

Let’s set aside the mail-in b****ts, and no v**er ID for a moment, and focus solely on two things that we all know actually happened; social media censoring the true H****r B***n laptop story, and social media spreading the false claim that Donald Trump called dead American soldiers in France “losers” and “suckers”. Both of those stories dropped within 2 months of e******n day, and every social media platform allowed the false Trump story based on an unverified unnamed source, to run through their platforms like wildfire. There was no proof, there was no corroboration; in fact, 21 people who were with Donald Trump in France, went on record and denied the story outright. Yet that false story was allowed to spread on social media. Conversely, the H****r B***n laptop story which the New York Post verified before running it, was taken down from social media within hours, based on the claim that it had not been authenticated, even though they knew it had been.

Those two stories are all you need to know that the 2020 P**********l e******n was r****d. If you censor every negative story about Joe Biden and spread every negative story about Donald Trump, you create a complete imbalance of information that will alter the outcome of the e******n. 16 percent of the people who v**ed for Biden, said if they had known about the H****r B***n laptop story, they would not have v**ed for him – that comes out to 12.9 million v**es – over 5 million more than the difference in the e******n. And here we have former President Obama claiming that the e******n was not r****d, and then calling for expanding one of the mechanisms they used to rig the e******n – selective censorship – arguing that it should be done to promote democracy. The Democrats live in their delusional world where they tell each other they are the only party who supports democracy which gives them the arrogance to act anti-democratically and rig our e******ns in the name of democracy because doing so ensured that the so-called pro-democracy party, their party, wins.

By: Judd Garrett, Objectivity is the Objective, April 20, 2022

“Roughly 40 percent of the country appears convinc... (show quote)

This thread shows how clueless u are

Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan

granbob wrote:

And if you read it here, you know it must be true.

If you see it happen, don't close your eyes to it. If you see the facts, don't close your mind.

Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan

dirtpusher wrote:

This thread shows how clueless u are

This isn't your type of thread. No dirt to push around here. Just the facts we all saw and common sense.

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

dirtpusher wrote:

This thread shows how clueless u are

Every thread you post shows how clueless you are. Anybody with common sense would know the rest of us understand your loss of clues but you insist on proving it to us. Trust me, we GET it.

Watch out. Any moment now your little sister, the little princess, will be right up to take your side with some snarky comment.

Dennis

Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan

Under the thin guise of what he considers misinformation, the real reason why B.O. wants to censor any speech about the 2020 e******n is simply because that travesty of injustice and fraud masquerading as democracy cannot withstand further scrutiny.

That is exactly what he says later in his speech. "Because of misinformation", The institutions can't stand up to the public's doubt about them.

Hmmm. Was this misinformation along the lines of saying that the Russians s***e the e******n? Or is it something else about what really could have happened that we saw with our own eyes? (40% of Americans, at least).

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

Fotoartist wrote:

This isn't your type of thread. No dirt to push around here. Just the facts we all saw and common sense.

It all it is trash bs

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

dennis2146 wrote:

Every thread you post shows how clueless you are. Anybody with common sense would know the rest of us understand your loss of clues but you insist on proving it to us. Trust me, we GET it.

Watch out. Any moment now your little sister, the little princess, will be right up to take your side with some snarky comment.

Dennis

Lol you one of the king of clueless

Texcaster Loc: Queensland

Fotoartist wrote:

“Roughly 40 percent of the country appears convinced that the current President was elected fraudulently and that the e******n was r****d,” Barack Obama said last week as he called for more censorship of social media. 40% is not a fringe group of extremists. It is a large segment of the population. So, 2 out of every 5 people you meet believe the e******n was r****d. That’s fairly mainstream thinking, and yet Barack Obama wants any mention of the e******n being r****d, scrubbed from the internet.

Let’s set aside the mail-in b****ts, and no v**er ID for a moment, and focus solely on two things that we all know actually happened; social media censoring the true H****r B***n laptop story, and social media spreading the false claim that Donald Trump called dead American soldiers in France “losers” and “suckers”. Both of those stories dropped within 2 months of e******n day, and every social media platform allowed the false Trump story based on an unverified unnamed source, to run through their platforms like wildfire. There was no proof, there was no corroboration; in fact, 21 people who were with Donald Trump in France, went on record and denied the story outright. Yet that false story was allowed to spread on social media. Conversely, the H****r B***n laptop story which the New York Post verified before running it, was taken down from social media within hours, based on the claim that it had not been authenticated, even though they knew it had been.

Those two stories are all you need to know that the 2020 P**********l e******n was r****d. If you censor every negative story about Joe Biden and spread every negative story about Donald Trump, you create a complete imbalance of information that will alter the outcome of the e******n. 16 percent of the people who v**ed for Biden, said if they had known about the H****r B***n laptop story, they would not have v**ed for him – that comes out to 12.9 million v**es – over 5 million more than the difference in the e******n. And here we have former President Obama claiming that the e******n was not r****d, and then calling for expanding one of the mechanisms they used to rig the e******n – selective censorship – arguing that it should be done to promote democracy. The Democrats live in their delusional world where they tell each other they are the only party who supports democracy which gives them the arrogance to act anti-democratically and rig our e******ns in the name of democracy because doing so ensured that the so-called pro-democracy party, their party, wins.

By: Judd Garrett, Objectivity is the Objective, April 20, 2022

“Roughly 40 percent of the country appears convinc... (show quote)

You are the target 'dingbat demographic'. This potted MAGA grievance grab bag will never die.

"... Barack Obama said last week as he called for more censorship of social media. ..." Really? link?

Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida

Fotoartist wrote:

“Roughly 40 percent of the country appears convinced that the current President was elected fraudulently and that the e******n was r****d,” Barack Obama said last week as he called for more censorship of social media. 40% is not a fringe group of extremists. It is a large segment of the population. So, 2 out of every 5 people you meet believe the e******n was r****d. That’s fairly mainstream thinking, and yet Barack Obama wants any mention of the e******n being r****d, scrubbed from the internet.

Let’s set aside the mail-in b****ts, and no v**er ID for a moment, and focus solely on two things that we all know actually happened; social media censoring the true H****r B***n laptop story, and social media spreading the false claim that Donald Trump called dead American soldiers in France “losers” and “suckers”. Both of those stories dropped within 2 months of e******n day, and every social media platform allowed the false Trump story based on an unverified unnamed source, to run through their platforms like wildfire. There was no proof, there was no corroboration; in fact, 21 people who were with Donald Trump in France, went on record and denied the story outright. Yet that false story was allowed to spread on social media. Conversely, the H****r B***n laptop story which the New York Post verified before running it, was taken down from social media within hours, based on the claim that it had not been authenticated, even though they knew it had been.

Those two stories are all you need to know that the 2020 P**********l e******n was r****d. If you censor every negative story about Joe Biden and spread every negative story about Donald Trump, you create a complete imbalance of information that will alter the outcome of the e******n. 16 percent of the people who v**ed for Biden, said if they had known about the H****r B***n laptop story, they would not have v**ed for him – that comes out to 12.9 million v**es – over 5 million more than the difference in the e******n. And here we have former President Obama claiming that the e******n was not r****d, and then calling for expanding one of the mechanisms they used to rig the e******n – selective censorship – arguing that it should be done to promote democracy. The Democrats live in their delusional world where they tell each other they are the only party who supports democracy which gives them the arrogance to act anti-democratically and rig our e******ns in the name of democracy because doing so ensured that the so-called pro-democracy party, their party, wins.

By: Judd Garrett, Objectivity is the Objective, April 20, 2022

“Roughly 40 percent of the country appears convinc... (show quote)

The piece has totally twisted Obama’s concern about the unbridled onslaught of Disinformation in this country.
The article is a good example of the kind of Disinformation and twisted opinions that fools rush to believe without thought.
Obama is NOT promoting censorship.

btbg

Kmgw9v wrote:

The piece has totally twisted Obama’s concern about the unbridled onslaught of Disinformation in this country.
The article is a good example of the kind of Disinformation and twisted opinions that fools rush to believe without thought.
Obama is NOT promoting censorship.

He's not? He said we need to censor disinformation. Remember the H****r B***n Story was labeled disinformation. So, yes, he is favoring censorship. But only censorship of the right and anything that the left believes is disinformation.