srt101fan wrote:
Thanks much, Paul. The picture looks much better. What did you do besides the dust cleanup? I'm sure this kind of photo is not everyone's cup of tea (I don't even know how I would categorize it, "Human Interest"?) but I've always liked it. I like the relationship shown between the two - looking off in different directions, in separate worlds, but gently connected holding hands. I had thought about posting the photo in Gallery to see if I could get a discussion going based on its content. Hence my interest in getting a good edited product. (
If anyone is still following this thread and wants to comment please do so!)
Paul, my basic hangup with scanning negatives is what adjustments to do in the scanner and what to leave for post-scanning editing. I posted on this before (
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-598134-1.html). For scans I plan to finish with Affinity, I'm trying to sort out the following and settle on a "standard" approach:
(1) I could scan with automated settings
(2) I could make custom adjustments - exposure, brightness and contrast; croping the image; use manual focus; make tone curve and histogram corrections.
(3) There's lots of stuff in the manual regarding specifying "input and output" parameters. There is a list of "Job" parameters that allows you to automatically load scan settings based on the final use of the image. I'm guessing that all I need, though, is to enter the max resolution of the scanner (3200 dpi)?
(4) I got a suggestion a while back to "
Set the scanner to read the film base as a 95% value (effectively black). Then adjust exposure to put the brightest highlight at 5% (effectively white). Finally, tweak gamma (midrange contrast) for the appearance you want." That sounded good but I have no idea how to do this!
I certainly don't expect you to address all this, especially since you're not familiar with the Minolta DiMage scanner. But I would appreciate any helpful thoughts you might have. A PM is fine if you think this thread has gone on too long already!
Thanks much, Paul. The picture looks much better.... (
show quote)
After reading / scanning the scanner manual in PDF, you want to set up 35mm film negatives to operate as a batch job. All the digital editor functions are 'great', but mostly unneeded. You have much more control in a dedicated digital editor on the digitized scan than you'll ever accomplish trying to edit the image during the scanning process.
There's a chart of all the default jobs in the back of the manual. I'd start with the parameters that load from 35mm '14-Megapixel image'. I would then adjust this job and save as your own custom 35mmPhoto17MP-Out. Update the pixels for in-size and out-size as: 5035x3339. There's other "input res" and "output res" and "magnification" fields. These will receive default values from loading the job = 14-Megapixel image. Just leave as-is.
For other parameters to configure into your custom job:
Use Auto for Exposure Control for Negatives
Autofocus at Scan
Use JPEGs for the sRGB colorspace, use Low compression for the JPEGs
Name the files automatically, into a custom folder location you specify for "scanning"
Since you're not going to 'edit' in the scanner, set your Index scan priority for Speed, and make the Prescan size = Small.
It seems you can also set-up separate "Image Correction Jobs". I would use in the Auto Dust Brush, maybe bias toward "High", but not all the way to High.
If you still have the negative used for the plane scene above, use that negative as a test case for your Batch Job settings.
If your custom job name doesn't become default, and you instead have to pick from a list every time to use, give it a name that sorts your custom job to the top of the sort list, like AA-xxxx.
I don't see a benefit of the grain dissolver nor pixel polish nor unmask sharpening.
It looks like Multi-Sampling adds time to the scanning process, but giving a better output. Here I used a clock / stopwatch and use the test image as a final round of testing. Test with OFF and options 2, 4 and 16. Note the duration time these settings make. It may just take too much time to be worth using, even at 2. But, I can't say without testing.