Don't agree - I thought that they were great. What I particularly liked - they were all a bit different to the usual run of the mill stuff we see so much of.
Delderby wrote:
Don't agree - I thought that they were great. What I particularly liked - they were all a bit different to the usual run of the mill stuff we see so much of.
"Run of the mill stuff" is produced by a run of the mill people.
So much B&W.
Like everything else, what's very good looks so easy.
So so. Way too artsy for me for the most part.
I thought the photos were generally good, but only a few 'turned my crank'. I'm not a pro, so it could be my limited skills in photography. For world class photos, I thought they could be better. After the first photo with the horse, it may have raised my expectations too much.
I even liked the QAnon photo... I think the guy's despicable (and I don't want to get into politics), but the photo was good.
[quote=traderjohn]"Run of the mill stuff" is produced by a run of the mill people.[/quote
Is it possible that, if what you say is true, "run of the mill people" would not generally appreciate these world class pictures?
[quote=Delderby][quote=traderjohn]"Run of the mill stuff" is produced by a run of the mill people.[/quote
Is it possible that, if what you say is true, "run of the mill people" would not generally appreciate these world class pictures?
[/quote]
No matter what they are just pictures.
traderjohn wrote:
No matter what they are just pictures.
Yes - they are just pictures - but all of them are rather special pictures - in my book not run of the mill.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.