Walk around or bridge recommendation.
[quote=EdgarCPoone]I know this has been asked in various forms before, but I am looking for recommendations for a good bridge, compact camera. I have older Nikons, (D5300 and D7200) with a number of lenses. I do a fair amount of international and domestic travel and it is just a pain to lug those cameras and accessories around.
A bridge camera automatically eliminates carrying accessories.., all you need is the camera. The advantage is extended focal range all-in-one. This also negates the Sony, as to achieve bridge camera capability, you still need accessories.
Gene51
Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
rlv567 wrote:
Your example photo is of what's bad, not good??? At any magnification, everything is just clumps of blur.
Loren - in Beautiful Baguio City
Exactly my point - It is not a great landscape camera - which is what the OP was asking about. On the other hand, for stuff that is closer, it's pretty good - I do love the camera, despite its limitations - which I have decided I can live with and work around.
DeanS
Loc: Capital City area of North Carolina
EdgarCPoone wrote:
I know this has been asked in various forms before, but I am looking for recommendations for a good bridge, compact camera. I have older Nikons, (D5300 and D7200) with a number of lenses. I do a fair amount of international and domestic travel and it is just a pain to lug those cameras and accessories around. I have been looking at the Sony A6400 and it appears to have some nice specs and good reviews although there were some negatives. Thought I would check this forum and see what the 'experts' would suggest for a good walk around, mirrorless compact camera, a popup flash would be nice along with a viewfinder. Most of my shooting is of landscapes so some zoom capabilities would be nice but not an extremely long reach. Would like to stick to something in the $1,000 range with $1,300 being the top.
I know this has been asked in various forms before... (
show quote)
I have used the Leica V-Lux series (3 and 4) for a number of yrs. Recently repl the V-Lux 4 (corupted btty) with the V-Lux 5. Don’t like the menu sys, otherwise, very nice camera.
I agree with the Z50 recommendation. It’ll be comfortable and an easy learning curve since you already shoot Nikon. It can be had with the two excellent kit lenses for about $1200.
They don’t get discussed here much but the Canon EOS M50 Mark II Mirrorless Camera with EF-M 15-45mm lens is a good choice for a travel camera. That lens puts you at a 24-70 fx equivalent. It has a good evf. It works well fir landscape. Lenses are interchangeable. I have the M5 model which is a bit older and love it for lightweight travel.
47greyfox wrote:
I also have a G1x iii and though I really enjoy it, I'm not sure I would call it a bridge camera, which is normally associated with longer reach? The G1x iii is 24-70mm equivalent. I use a third party lens hood on mine but I haven't seen any other lens attachments?
It definitely is a marvelous little camera though that doesn't get a lot of respect. It could stand a brighter lens like the G5x ii but would that would probably compromise the compact size.
Currently available refurbished on Canon's website for about $800.
I also have a G1x iii and though I really enjoy it... (
show quote)
I have a telephoto lens attachment for mine.
kcooke wrote:
They don’t get discussed here much but the Canon EOS M50 Mark II Mirrorless Camera with EF-M 15-45mm lens is a good choice for a travel camera. That lens puts you at a 24-70 fx equivalent. It has a good evf. It works well fir landscape. Lenses are interchangeable. I have the M5 model which is a bit older and love it for lightweight travel.
I have an M50, not the mk II, and it's a really nice little camera.
SuperflyTNT wrote:
I agree with the Z50 recommendation. It’ll be comfortable and an easy learning curve since you already shoot Nikon. It can be had with the two excellent kit lenses for about $1200.
Quite frankly, the image quality of the small Z50 with the tiny, 16-50mm kit lens mounted is significantly better than some of the other choices mentioned here. While some of them have many more features than the Z50, the only thing that really matters in my book is image quantity which is where the Z50 excels. With good glass, the output quality rivals that of a Nikon D7500, and some reviews say a D500 as well.
The Z50 also has excellent build quality at its price point with a moderate amount of weather sealing and a magnesium alloy body .
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.