lyndacast wrote:
I have been reading so many amazing responses to my previous post and wanted to thank of you who took the time to explain your perspectives, how you use PS, what is best functions are, and how to proceed with integrating it into my workflow if, and when I might need it. I will study each of the excellent responses in depth in the next few weeks, but really wanted each of you to know that I so appreciate the feedback.
Lynda
Hi Lynda -
Photoshop can do so many things that there isn't anything it can't do. This, of course, is my opinion and it may be limited by what I'll ever want to do in a photograph. Having said that, I am not interested in many experimental techniques like dipping a print into developer and then bringing the wet print (unfixed) into the light and letting it fog for 10 seconds and then stopping the image from getting any darker. This stuff I did when I was young and I don't experiment like that anymore. Still, if I think about it I can get that kind of effect in Photoshop if I think about how to use the tools to do that. It may not look "authentic" thought.
But for "regular" things like replacing one person in a group shot. PS is easy for that. I shoot a number of shots when I shoot digital captures of a group, When I do shoot I don't move from my position. Then if 3 people out of 20 don't have their best expression on their face, I simply cut them out of the shot where they do look good and then I place them onto a layer above the main shot. I can then have a group shot where everyone looks at their best. When I shot film (weddings, for example) I couldn't do that and had to wait until everyone looked their best, and even then, someone might blink.
Of course you may need to clone in edges so the clone tool is essential to learn. But since everyone is in the same position and size, it's fairly easy. If you want to take an expression from another capture you'll need to resize that shot by using the "Transform" tool to get the head size similar to the one in the main group shot. So, now, you'll need to be familiar with the transform tool. I shot a group family shot where I left room for myself on the edge of the frame. Then I had someone shoot the group shot instead of me. I simply placed myself into the shot where I was the photographer and then I was included in the large family shot. These are examples where you can accommodate the tools available when you are shooting the photograph.
So, in short, the more you know about Photoshop and its many tools, the more you can do. I do everything with PS. I am having a show in a gallery next year. I just came back from the gallery where I shot the walls of the gallery. I place 6 foot wide tables in front of the 4 walls. I will now place the framed photos I want to display on these walls. I know what size to "transform" the framed images to because I know what sizes the frames are AND, based on the 6' wide tables, I know how much to transform the famed images based on their relative size to the 6' wide tables. This is another example. Then I will "float" the frames away from the walls by adding a drop shadow behind 2 sides of each frame. I will "blur" the drop shadow and place it underneath the layer of the framed images thereby having the framed image "cut awayi" the blurred drop shadow that will fall within the framed image. The drop shadow will only appear on 2 sides. This will make the composite look 3 dimensional. This is another example, so you need to know how to "blur" something.
Hope this makes sense and helps.