Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Question regarding lense
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Mar 13, 2022 16:31:20   #
Creative Images by Judy
 
I shoot with a Sony 77a Markii. I have been searching for a bigger lense as I do a lot of wildlife and waterfowl. I saw a member in the forum who recommended mpb to somebody else about equipment.

I found a used Sigma 120 - 400, a mount ( very hard to find as my understanding is Sony is going to start doing away with a mount) on MPB. It is in good condition and is described as having light dust in the lense which will not impact quality of photos. 349$
My question is, does light dust impact the quality of the photo??

I have never bought used lenses so I am pretty much watching what folks here say. I appreciate all your constructive input. Thanks so much.
Oh I am using a Sony kit lense that came with my 350a back in mid 2000's, so an upgrade is obviously needed. It is a 70 - 300, but my camera has button to increase focal length 1.4x or 2.0x. I use this feature frequently and do get decent results, however, I realize a lense is needed...again thanks for your input.

Reply
Mar 13, 2022 17:27:38   #
polonois Loc: Lancaster County,PA.
 
I use a Minolta 100-400 APO on my Sony A65 and my Sony 77a Markii. It works fine and produces tack sharp images. I bought mine new many years ago and used it on a Minolta 9XI. You can pick up one in excellent quality used for 200 to 300 dollars.

Reply
Mar 13, 2022 23:23:06   #
Creative Images by Judy
 
Doe the auto focus work?

Reply
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Mar 13, 2022 23:33:28   #
MDI Mainer
 
I have found MPB's representation as to the condition and functionality of the used gear they sell to be spot on. In addition you have a seven-day no questions asked return period for you to try the lens yourself.

BTW almost every lens has some dust in it most often with no impact on image quality.

https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/08/the-apocalypse-of-lens-dust/#:~:text=Every%20lens%20has%20dust%20inside,and%20then%20go%20take%20pictures

For a longer reach, which many consider necessary for serious bird photography, there is the Tamron 150-600 G1 in A mount, but it's more expensive (MPB is listing one now). The even better G2 in A mount, having had a very brief production run, is rare but does appear from time to time on eBay. (I don't believe Sigma ever produced their 150-600 Contemporary in A mount.)

https://www.kenrockwell.com/tamron/150-600mm.htm

https://www.dxomark.com/tamron-sp-150-600mm-f5-6-3-di-vc-usd-g2-review-affordable-tele-zoom/

Reply
Mar 13, 2022 23:41:49   #
polonois Loc: Lancaster County,PA.
 
Creative Images by Judy wrote:
Doe the auto focus work?

Yes , no problems

Reply
Mar 14, 2022 00:45:07   #
Orphoto Loc: Oregon
 
Light dust is not an issue.

Reply
Mar 14, 2022 07:06:32   #
Don, the 2nd son Loc: Crowded Florida
 
Creative Images by Judy wrote:
I shoot with a Sony 77a Markii. I have been searching for a bigger lense as I do a lot of wildlife and waterfowl. I saw a member in the forum who recommended mpb to somebody else about equipment.

I found a used Sigma 120 - 400, a mount ( very hard to find as my understanding is Sony is going to start doing away with a mount) on MPB. It is in good condition and is described as having light dust in the lense which will not impact quality of photos. 349$
My question is, does light dust impact the quality of the photo??

I have never bought used lenses so I am pretty much watching what folks here say. I appreciate all your constructive input. Thanks so much.
Oh I am using a Sony kit lense that came with my 350a back in mid 2000's, so an upgrade is obviously needed. It is a 70 - 300, but my camera has button to increase focal length 1.4x or 2.0x. I use this feature frequently and do get decent results, however, I realize a lense is needed...again thanks for your input.
I shoot with a Sony 77a Markii. I have been search... (show quote)


I have relied on information posted here to help guide me through the forest of available lenses with good results. The info here has been eye opening.
https://www.dyxum.com/lenses/index.asp

Reply
 
 
Mar 14, 2022 08:10:48   #
Canisdirus
 
Dust in the front elements...no big deal.
Dust in the rear elements...bigger deal.

Reply
Mar 14, 2022 09:07:36   #
Lucian Loc: From Wales, living in Ohio
 
Just a reminder, there is no "E" on the end of the word Lens.

Reply
Mar 14, 2022 09:53:04   #
olemikey Loc: 6 mile creek, Spacecoast Florida
 
Don, the 2nd son wrote:
I have relied on information posted here to help guide me through the forest of available lenses with good results. The info here has been eye opening.
https://www.dyxum.com/lenses/index.asp


Yes, dyxum site is a great resource, not scientific evaluations, but plenty of actual (claimed) user input on a very large number of A mount and some E mount lenses. I've used it many times.

Reply
Mar 14, 2022 10:30:52   #
Canisdirus
 
FYI...Sony dumped A-mount a while back...no longer sold by them anymore as new.

If you want the best long zoom lens you can get for your A-mount...keep an eye out for the stellar Sony 70-400mm II lens. Native is always best...even on an A-Mount.
Old Minolta's are still nice...but Sony was designing for their specific bodies near the end of the A-mount line.
The 70-400mm was the pinnacle of said design.

Reply
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
Mar 14, 2022 10:50:58   #
BobHartung Loc: Bettendorf, IA
 
Creative Images by Judy wrote:
I shoot with a Sony 77a Markii. I have been searching for a bigger lense as I do a lot of wildlife and waterfowl. I saw a member in the forum who recommended mpb to somebody else about equipment.

I found a used Sigma 120 - 400, a mount ( very hard to find as my understanding is Sony is going to start doing away with a mount) on MPB. It is in good condition and is described as having light dust in the lense which will not impact quality of photos. 349$
My question is, does light dust impact the quality of the photo??

I have never bought used lenses so I am pretty much watching what folks here say. I appreciate all your constructive input. Thanks so much.
Oh I am using a Sony kit lense that came with my 350a back in mid 2000's, so an upgrade is obviously needed. It is a 70 - 300, but my camera has button to increase focal length 1.4x or 2.0x. I use this feature frequently and do get decent results, however, I realize a lense is needed...again thanks for your input.
I shoot with a Sony 77a Markii. I have been search... (show quote)


For your entertainment. Why is it that so many with photography as a hobby don't know how to spell the basic parts?





Reply
Mar 14, 2022 10:53:32   #
MDI Mainer
 
An interesting read from Lens Rentals on the development of the camera lens as we know them.

https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2022/02/a-brief-history-of-early-lenses-part-1/

Reply
Mar 14, 2022 10:58:52   #
MDI Mainer
 
Canisdirus wrote:
FYI...Sony dumped A-mount a while back...no longer sold by them anymore as new.

If you want the best long zoom lens you can get for your A-mount...keep an eye out for the stellar Sony 70-400mm II lens. Native is always best...even on an A-Mount.
Old Minolta's are still nice...but Sony was designing for their specific bodies near the end of the A-mount line.
The 70-400mm was the pinnacle of said design.


The price is astronomical compared to what the OP is talking about. "Native is always best" is so 20th century, but native A mount glass is still available from retailers -- I wonder why.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=Sony%2070%20400mm%20F%204%205.6%20G%20Ssm%20Ii&N=0&InitialSearch=yes&ap=Y&gclid=Cj0KCQjwz7uRBhDRARIsAFqjulk4VLtlcmFEyxUXmWZOB2GPZNcixDVAAEmyIVLuazdH5sLx8Uma9asaAoo6EALw_wcB

Reply
Mar 14, 2022 11:08:58   #
EJMcD
 
BobHartung wrote:
For your entertainment. Why is it that so many with photography as a hobby don't know how to spell the basic parts?


If someone makes a typo (we have all done that) or otherwise does not know correct spelling, who cares? We' re here to discuss all things photographic not criticise nor bring attention to anyone's minor spelling errors.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.