JohnFrim wrote:
It looks like the viewer widens the interocular distance for the larger image that you posted. Marty Feldman might be able to view the original without the help of a viewer, but most folks can't look wall-eyed enough to accommodate.
I have practiced both cross-eyed and parallel 3D image viewing without the need for a viewer, but the parallel viewing only works if the images are separated by my interocular spacing. I was able to view your original image pair with parallel viewing but I had to back away from monitor to about 6 feet.
It looks like the viewer widens the interocular di... (
show quote)
I had to work at it for a minute but your viewing technique for this works for correct stereo as opposed to pseudo (reversed depth) stereo. It's complicated isn't it.