jcwall396 Loc: Roswell, GA

Hey thanks so much for the recommendation! I can’t imagine a much better recommendation than three safaris. Also thanks for the tip on the book….

jcwall396 Loc: Roswell, GA

Wow……spectacular images! Ok, I’m sold on the Sony!

jcwall396 Loc: Roswell, GA

Very nice photos….I love shooting the car shows. Do you shoot in RAW….? ANd what do you use for post processing? And do you ever bracket your photos? Just curious as to how you’re using the camera.

PHRubin Loc: Nashville TN USA

If you click "quote reply" under the post you are responding to as I did here, we can tell who you are addressing.

jcwall396 Loc: Roswell, GA

Oops….sorry about that!

jcwall396 Loc: Roswell, GA

Very nice photos…..I’ve shot several car shows on the panhandle and it’s something I enjoy. I’m guessing you shoot in RAW? Do you ever bracket your images using this camera?

Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)

Thanks!

No, I don't bracket, unless you mean HDR. Frankly, when I had a D200, HDR bracketing was important. With the RX10M4, D800 and D810 - I find I rarely have to use HDR. And yes, I shoot only raw.

Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)

I pretty much use Capture One for my Sony images and I only shoot raw. I find I get to the result I like faster and the result is better than with the others I use (Lightroom, DXO, and On1).

RVAshooter Loc: Richmond, VA

I use a Sony RX-10 iv when I want minimum weight while hiking but expect to need some telephoto reach. The results are very good compared to my usual full-frame cameras and their bulky lenses. The only issue I have with the RX-10 is with noise at 1600 ISO in deep shadows, and that can be fixed with Topaz Denoise. Also, I don't use back button focus as much as I do on other bodies because the button is not easy to locate quickly. The FZ-2500 has less reach (480 vs. 600mm) and is 1/3 stop less light sensitive. The sensor and ISO rating are identical on paper. I have used the FZ-1000 (predecessor to the 2500) and found the build quality to be lighter than the Sony, which also has some degree of weather sealing that has kept out dust. So the extra cost for the Sony is probably justified.

lreisner Loc: Union,NJ

I own the Sony RX10III which I love. It takes great pictures and does everything most things that my Sony AR7IV can. I hear the IV is even better. I also own the Sony RX 100 VII which is a great pocket camera. I thought about buying the Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 but decided on the Sony despite the price difference. It still has the edge. If you want all of the capabilities of your SLR, go with the RX10IV. It is an amazing camera and overlooked by many. I love the camera for street photography. The camera is capable of shooting in burst and is good for action photography. I'll attach some pictures that I took at the 2021 US Open from the upper deck of Ash Stadium. The camera is not cheap, but you are getting a terrific lens and a more than capable camera for the price. The menus do take a bit of learning but you can customize the menu and buttons, so you'll rarely need to go into the menu.

The attached pictures were taken at night games. As noted, these pictures were taken from the upper deck. Good luck in your choice. It probably doesn't matter in your choice, but a couple of days ago I read that Panasonic was getting out of the camera business. I was sorry to hear the news. The more companies in the camera business the better it is for everyone. It keeps the price down and pushes innovation.

Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)

Maybe you are underexposing. This was at ISO 6400, and the shadow noise doesn't detract. I just used the noise sliders in Capture One.

(Download)

Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)

The cost is considerably less than full frame after you factor in the 24-600 (equivalent) lens. Seriously, $1700 is a bargain.

jcwall396 Loc: Roswell, GA

WOW!!!!! Those photographs are off the charts awesome! I’m sold…..thanks so much for your response and for posting examples. I am floored at how clear those are from the upper deck. Wow….

jcwall396 Loc: Roswell, GA

Excellent image and without pixel peeping, I don’t see any noise….

ashriverguy Loc: Rural Minnesota

I have shot briefly with the Sony and it’s a fantastic camera although I have never owned one. I have owned the Panasonic FZ 1000 and returned it for the FZ 2500 and like it a lot and the Leica lens is excellent. I do use the pop up flash and I like the full articulating rear touch screen on the Panasonic but it’s not dust and water resistant like the Sony is. All in all, if the double cost isn’t an issue I’d go with the Sony. Another issue, the Sony has been around for some time, is it time for a new model Sony?? I’m waiting.