Mengele jabs? The Nuremberg protocols were established to prevent medical experimentation of the type carried out by N**i Germany, in WW2, ever occurring again. At this moment in time...

Chrishants Loc: England

The Nuremberg protocols were established to prevent medical experimentation of the type carried out by N**i Germany, in WW2, ever occurring again.

At this moment in time, the widespread use of ineffective and unsafe C19 treatments, which have not been properly tested, and with very few of the subjects providing informed consent, seems directly contrary to the intents of the Nuremberg protocol?

Sacrificing many millions of lives worldwide, simply to advance NWO interests, by blocking treatments, which ARE safe and effective, seems to me far worse than the N**i medical experiments in WW2.

FrumCA

Chrishants wrote:

The Nuremberg protocols were established to preven... (show quote)

Yikes!! You may be moving towards the top of the conspiracy theorists list with this sort of nonsense. Where do you find this BS. I'm particularly curious how you define "properly" tested. What does that entail??

Chrishants Loc: England

FrumCA wrote:

Yikes!! You may be moving towards the top of the conspiracy theorists list with this sort of nonsense. Where do you find this BS. I'm particularly curious how you define "properly" tested. What does that entail??

I suggest you take the time to read the Nuremberg protocol, look at V***S data on deaths and serious injury, and take onboard the very serious and well funded efforts to rubbish ALL effective and safe treatments. All of those things are FACT and well documented in the public domain.

FrumCA

Chrishants wrote:

I suggest you take the time to read the Nuremberg protocol, look at V***S data on deaths and serious injury, and take onboard the very serious and well funded efforts to rubbish ALL effective and safe treatments. All of those things are FACT and well documented in the public domain.

I'll get right on that. In the meantime I suggest you take a look at the well documented data that shows the effectiveness of the v*****e. I would be pleased to read about efforts to rubbish ALL effective and safe treatments.

Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan

Chrishants wrote:

The Nuremberg protocols were established to preven... (show quote)

I might add this. In the U.S. whenever drugs are advertised on TV they have to list all the possible adverse side effects which take up a good portion of the commercial. Why don't they even ever mention some of the five serious side effects of the C***d v*****e to the public?

Sure there are benefits but as with most drugs there are dangers too. Not repeating these and informing the public seems like malpractice by itself.

Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana

Fotoartist wrote:

Not repeating these and informing the public seems like malpractice by itself.

Malpractice? Possibly so. Worse than Mengele? The OP's moral compass is broken.

Chrishants Loc: England

Rab-Eye wrote:

Malpractice? Possibly so. Worse than Mengele? The OP's moral compass is broken.

Do you feel it is wholly acceptable to risk the lives of children, in pursuit of the fulfillment of NWO agendas?

Chrishants Loc: England

Fotoartist wrote:

I might add this. In the U.S. whenever drugs are advertised on TV they have to list all the possible adverse side effects which take up a good portion of the commercial. Why don't they even ever mention some of the five serious side effects of the C***d v*****e to the public?

Sure there are benefits but as with most drugs there are dangers too. Not repeating these and informing the public seems like malpractice by itself.

Very good points! Worth bearing in mind though that the C19 poisons have been rolled out under emergency use legislation, and there is no legal liability for the producers.

However, bearing in mind the number of recorded negative effects of the poisons, it would be quite impossible for anyone being jabbed to provide informed consent, as they are almost all oblivious to the negative effects.

Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan

Rab-Eye wrote:

Malpractice? Possibly so. Worse than Mengele? The OP's moral compass is broken.

I will say, it is incredulous how they are playing down all the therapeutic treatments and even condemning some of them while solely pushing the v*****e. Curious.

FrumCA

Chrishants wrote:

However, bearing in mind the number of recorded negative effects of the poisons, it would be quite impossible for anyone being jabbed to provide informed consent, as they are almost all oblivious to the negative effects.

You appear to be claiming to be an expert on this or at least more knowledgeable than those who have elected to be v******ted, so how do you know they are oblivious to the effects? What are your credentials?

Chrishants Loc: England

Fotoartist wrote:

I will say, it is incredulous how they are playing down all the therapeutic treatments and even condemning some of them while solely pushing the v*****e. Curious.

Bear in mind that had effective treatments been widely employed last year, the C19 s**m would have ended pretty quickly.

Without vax, passports, travel restrictions, social credit scoring, internment camps, and all the other things leading up to the installation of socialist one world government, C19 would have failed.

Hence the very well organised efforts to rubbish all effective and safe treatments.

FrumCA

Chrishants wrote:

Bear in mind that had effective treatments been widely employed last year, the C19 s**m would have ended pretty quickly.

Without vax, passports, travel restrictions, social credit scoring, internment camps, and all the other things leading up to the installation of socialist one world government, C19 would have failed.

Hence the very well organised efforts to rubbish all effective and safe treatments.

You have referred to 'effective' treatments in one form or another since you started this thread but you've provided no evidence other than your opinion on this. Recalling the old "where's the beef" ad, what treatments are you talking about?

Chrishants Loc: England

FrumCA wrote:

You appear to be claiming to be an expert on this or at least more knowledgeable than those who have elected to be v******ted, so how do you know they are oblivious to the effects? What are your credentials?

The fact that at the time many were jabbed, millions of a*****e e***ts had been recorded following vax, yet very few of those being injected, bothered to take an hour to investigate the a*****e e***ts, is, perhaps, a measure of how well-informed those taking part in the experiment actually were/are?

Chrishants Loc: England

FrumCA wrote:

You have referred to 'effective' treatments in one form or another since you started this thread but you've provided no evidence other than your opinion on this. Recalling the old "where's the beef" ad, what treatments are you talking about?

Compare India, where effective treatments, were widely employed, to high Mengele jab countries such as UK and US.

FrumCA

Chrishants wrote:

The fact that at the time many were jabbed, millions of a*****e e***ts had been recorded following vax, yet very few of those being injected, bothered to take an hour to investigate the a*****e e***ts, is, perhaps, a measure of how well-informed those taking part in the experiment actually were/are?

And, once again, how do you know that very few of those being injected bothered to investigate the a*****e e***ts?
Is that truly a fact or simply your opinion garnered from anti-vax sites???