Eric Swalwell teaches Lauren Boebert that people who live in MAGA houses shouldn't throw stones
Jan 8, 2022 14:27:21 #
Kmgw9v wrote:
Research her .
She may or may not be "right", however she is not stupid imho.
Intelligent people may have an "agenda" to maintain
and bulls**t (or not) to support that agenda.
Ergo a bulls**t artist is not necessarily stupid.
Jan 8, 2022 18:09:45 #
Doesn't the opening line of the article tell you the piece is a bit more than slightly biased?
"Lauren Boebert’s natural milieu is a dive bar, so it’s kind of hard to decipher her dreck without at least 12 shots of Jägermeister and a Busch Light or three prepping my brain for her authentic frontier gibberish."
I've listened to both Swalwell and Boebert speak from the floor and she's an order of magnitude more literate and cogent than he is. The fact that he was too stupid to realize he was being rolled in the hay for information speaks volumes as well.
"Lauren Boebert’s natural milieu is a dive bar, so it’s kind of hard to decipher her dreck without at least 12 shots of Jägermeister and a Busch Light or three prepping my brain for her authentic frontier gibberish."
I've listened to both Swalwell and Boebert speak from the floor and she's an order of magnitude more literate and cogent than he is. The fact that he was too stupid to realize he was being rolled in the hay for information speaks volumes as well.
Jan 8, 2022 20:15:52 #
thom w wrote:
You keep Louie, I'll keep Swalwell.
How about we get rid of them both?
Jan 8, 2022 20:18:20 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
Blurryeyed wrote:
How about we get rid of them both?
Sounds like a fair deal.
Jan 9, 2022 08:58:17 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
Blurryeyed wrote:
How about we get rid of them both?
I only know Swalwell from watching him in interviews. Based on that, I see a reasonable representative. I'm not in his district but I'm not far either. I'm perfectively willing to admit that there may be things I'm unaware of that would change my mind, but I haven't seen them. I would expect you to h**e my rep more. My rep is Ro Khana, who I'm quite impressed with. I didn't v**e for him the first time (in the primary) but I'm glad he won. He impresses me as everything you would h**e, but that has nothing to do with my support for him.
Jan 9, 2022 11:25:09 #
thom w wrote:
I only know Swalwell from watching him in intervie... (show quote)
Swalwell would be best compared to Matt Gates on the republican side of the aisle, no less vitriolic and no less a spreader of partisan propaganda.
Jan 9, 2022 14:00:12 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
cwp3420 wrote:
Eric Swallwell is the biggest i***t ever elected. He shows what morons in California prefer for a Congressman.
Then why don't you get elected and take his title?
Jan 9, 2022 14:02:26 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
Blurryeyed wrote:
Swalwell would be best compared to Matt Gates on the republican side of the aisle, no less vitriolic and no less a spreader of partisan propaganda.
It's possible but I've seen him a lot on TV and I never saw it. One can get pretty slimy and still not be down to Gates' level. Did you v**e for Gates, or were you in the wrong district?
Jan 9, 2022 14:04:24 #
thom w wrote:
It's possible but I've seen him a lot on TV and I never saw it One can get pretty slimy and still not be down to Gates' level.
Swalwell is there, he is one of the slimiest in congress.
Jan 9, 2022 14:06:07 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
Blurryeyed wrote:
Swalwell is there, he is one of the slimiest in congress.
He's one person that you just want to punch in the face lol.
Jan 9, 2022 14:07:08 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
Racmanaz wrote:
He's one person that you just want to punch in the face lol.
Have you considered anger management?
Jan 9, 2022 14:09:04 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
thom w wrote:
Have you considered anger management?
Nope, don't need it, I'm just honest about it. I know you feel like you could just punch a Republican in the face that you are disgusted with, you are just not honest enough to admit to it are you? I know we both wouldn't actually do it, but I feel like it. lol
Jan 9, 2022 14:09:05 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
Blurryeyed wrote:
Swalwell is there, he is one of the slimiest in congress.
I'm curious why you haven't cited any examples. I'm not asking you to do my research, but it sounded as though you already have some incidents in mind.
Jan 9, 2022 14:10:25 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
thom w wrote:
I'm curious why you haven't cited any examples. I'm not asking you to do my research, but it sounded as though you already have some incidents in mind.
How about Swalwel being a nutty Trump hating conspiracy nut case?
Jan 9, 2022 14:13:10 #
thom w wrote:
I'm curious why you haven't cited any examples. I'm not asking you to do my research, but it sounded as though you already have some incidents in mind.
He was one of the most prolific liars in the entire Russia Russia Russia fiasco, he lied about what evidence he had, he lied about what he supposedly knew and he was one of the primary media faces during the first few years of the Trump presidency spreading lies and dividing the nation. You probably support that crap but it was extremely damaging to the nation both here and abroad.
He is a sleaze ball, anyone who lies to his constituents as much as he did does not belong in congress, there should be a rule and a law!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.