Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
My Rittenhouse Take
Page 1 of 9 next> last>>
Nov 24, 2021 19:22:41   #
soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
 
I still say it was self defense. But seeing the trial presented in a different light and after seeing
a recent brief history of Rittenhouse.

He was presented as a squeaky clean Boy Scout type not so much.
He should have been convicted on the gun charge being under age
because under Wisconsin law a minor can carry a gun if he is going hunting.
According to his testimony no one hired him to protect any buildings and after
reviewing his brief history his heart may not have been in the right place for
going out. But again he is not guilty of murder or manslaughter it was definitely
an act of self defense.

Reply
Nov 24, 2021 19:46:36   #
Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay
 
soba1 wrote:
I still say it was self defense. But seeing the trial presented in a different light and after seeing
a recent brief history of Rittenhouse.

He was presented as a squeaky clean Boy Scout type not so much.
He should have been convicted on the gun charge being under age
because under Wisconsin law a minor can carry a gun if he is going hunting.
According to his testimony no one hired him to protect any buildings and after
reviewing his brief history his heart may not have been in the right place for
going out. But again he is not guilty of murder or manslaughter it was definitely
an act of self defense.
I still say it was self defense. But seeing the tr... (show quote)


That could have been all avoided. That's the kicker.

Reply
Nov 24, 2021 19:48:50   #
soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
 
Kraken wrote:
That could have been all avoided. That's the kicker.


Yep

Reply
 
 
Nov 24, 2021 20:00:57   #
Texcaster Loc: Queensland
 
Kraken wrote:
That could have been all avoided. That's the kicker.


In situations like this the de facto position is always ... "More guns! More self-defense! More armed morons!"

Reply
Nov 24, 2021 20:26:53   #
Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay
 
Texcaster wrote:
In situations like this the de facto position is always ... "More guns! More self-defense! More armed morons!"


The Forefathers had no imagination at all as to what the future could be like.

The boneheads totally abused the second amendment.

Reply
Nov 24, 2021 20:28:35   #
Texcaster Loc: Queensland
 
Kraken wrote:
The Forefathers had no imagination at all as to what the future could be like.

The boneheads totally abused the second amendment.


It's a runaway freedom train.

Reply
Nov 24, 2021 20:30:31   #
Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay
 
Texcaster wrote:
It's a runaway freedom train.


It will all come to a head soon. Many many lives will be lost.

Reply
 
 
Nov 24, 2021 20:38:46   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
soba1 wrote:
Yep


Kind of like the ones that got sent to to prison. They gonna meet a couple big black bubba's for trying KK kI'll one black boy. Good nuff for them

Reply
Nov 24, 2021 20:46:37   #
soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
 
dirtpusher wrote:
Kind of like the ones that got sent to to prison. They gonna meet a couple big black bubba's for trying KK kI'll one black boy. Good nuff for them


Now that was stupid. We cant let anarchist run wild. My point about Rittenhouse his motives may not have been all that altruistic.

Reply
Nov 24, 2021 20:49:36   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
soba1 wrote:
Now that was stupid. We cant let anarchist run wild. My point about Rittenhouse his motives may not have been all that altruistic.


You right the anarchist need be dealt with seriously for the rest

Reply
Nov 24, 2021 20:55:15   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
soba1 wrote:
I still say it was self defense. But seeing the trial presented in a different light and after seeing
a recent brief history of Rittenhouse.

He was presented as a squeaky clean Boy Scout type not so much.
He should have been convicted on the gun charge being under age
because under Wisconsin law a minor can carry a gun if he is going hunting.
According to his testimony no one hired him to protect any buildings and after
reviewing his brief history his heart may not have been in the right place for
going out. But again he is not guilty of murder or manslaughter it was definitely
an act of self defense.
I still say it was self defense. But seeing the tr... (show quote)


Rittenhouse was not illegally in possession of that fire arm as a minor, he would have been illegally in possession of a firearm IF the firearm was a short barrel which this was not.

Reply
 
 
Nov 24, 2021 21:06:14   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
Racmanaz wrote:
Rittenhouse was not illegally in possession of that fire arm as a minor, he would have been illegally in possession of a firearm IF the firearm was a short barrel which this was not.


But he is in possession of a crazy mind like the guy he went visited

Reply
Nov 24, 2021 21:07:27   #
soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
 
Racmanaz wrote:
Rittenhouse was not illegally in possession of that fire arm as a minor, he would have been illegally in possession of a firearm IF the firearm was a short barrel which this was not.


The way it was explained if he was hunting.
Now if the barrel of the gun makes a difference then I stand corrected.

Reply
Nov 24, 2021 21:33:45   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
dirtpusher wrote:
But he is in possession of a crazy mind like the guy he went visited


The pot and kettle routine. lol

Reply
Nov 24, 2021 22:38:33   #
David Martin Loc: Cary, NC
 
Kraken wrote:
That could have been all avoided. That's the kicker.


If only the police had been allowed to do their job, keep the protests peaceful, and prevent as much arson, l**ting and thuggery as possible.

Reply
Page 1 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.