Impropper rifle usage (Page 2): OMG!!!!! And you would lose that as well. The district attorney was/is an i***t for even bringing Rittenhouse to trial knowing the evidence was stacked...

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

LDB415 wrote:

That might be. Then I'd sue him in civil court for mental anguish and terrorizing acts against another citizen.

OMG!!!!! And you would lose that as well. The district attorney was/is an i***t for even bringing Rittenhouse to trial knowing the evidence was stacked against him. His firearm handling also indicates his idiocy. But, and I mean no offense, if you cannot handle an unloaded firearm pointed at you in this specific circumstance then I think you would be laughed out of court.

Dennis

JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.

boberic wrote:

If I were any where in that courtroom and that rifle was pointed at me, I would stand up and shout, as loudly as I could "POINT that weapon somewhere else" and gladly take any punishment

Prosecutor wielding a firearm; defendant sobbing uncontrollably; judge admonishing the prosecutor… great theatre, no?

boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander

dennis2146 wrote:

OMG!!!!! And you would lose that as well. The district attorney was/is an i***t for even bringing Rittenhouse to trial knowing the evidence was stacked against him. His firearm handling also indicates his idiocy. But, and I mean no offense, if you cannot handle an unloaded firearm pointed at you in this specific circumstance then I think you would be laughed out of court.

Dennis

I am certain you are probably right. But I still would be preferred to be laughed at than dead

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

boberic wrote:

I am certain you are probably right. But I still would be preferred to be laughed at than dead

And you have the right to do what you please in that circumstance. I have no problem with it whatsoever.

Dennis

LDB415 Loc: Houston south suburb

dennis2146 wrote:

OMG!!!!! And you would lose that as well. The district attorney was/is an i***t for even bringing Rittenhouse to trial knowing the evidence was stacked against him. His firearm handling also indicates his idiocy. But, and I mean no offense, if you cannot handle an unloaded firearm pointed at you in this specific circumstance then I think you would be laughed out of court.

Dennis

Yeah, but both charges and cases would cause problems and grief to an anti-gun l*****t terd who deserves all the problems Karma can put on him. And unless I am personally holding a weapon that I have personally checked twice to be empty without letting it out of my control it is not an unloaded firearm.

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

LDB415 wrote:

Yeah, but both charges and cases would cause problems and grief to an anti-gun l*****t terd who deserves all the problems Karma can put on him. And unless I am personally holding a weapon that I have personally checked twice to be empty without letting it out of my control it is not an unloaded firearm.

Do as you wish. I am not arguing with you. I support wh**ever you want to do. I simply think you are overstating the problems and grief you would try to bring. I wish you well.

Dennis

boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander

LDB415 wrote:

Yeah, but both charges and cases would cause problems and grief to an anti-gun l*****t terd who deserves all the problems Karma can put on him. And unless I am personally holding a weapon that I have personally checked twice to be empty without letting it out of my control it is not an unloaded firearm.

Again, If I am the one that has that weapon pointed at me, I must assume its fully loaded. And If I k**led you It would be judged to be self defense. That movie producer is still dead

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

boberic wrote:

Again, If I am the one that has that weapon pointed at me, I must assume its fully loaded. And If I k**led you It would be judged to be self defense

No, under the circumstances presented, it would not be judged self defense. Sorry but that is just the way it is.

Dennis

WNYShooter Loc: WNY

boberic wrote:

In the trial The prosecutor is holding the rifle in a way that would gaurantee his severe injury if he fired it. Quite obviose he never fired a rifle. He has the stock pressed so tightly against his right cheek the skin is folded over the stock. Even a slight recoil might break his jaw. The stock is also not properly positioned against his shoulder. Again a slight recoil would injure his shoulder. He is a textbook example of improper rifle usage

AR15's really don't kick all that hard, especially in 223. If it was an AR10 type(they both look the same), then you might have an argument there.

The AR15 I used to compete with, because it weighed 16#'s, had virtually no kick.

Now when I first started competing, it was with a Bolt SMLE, 303 British, that kicked very hard. Then I moved to using a Garand, 30-06, that kicked pretty hard as well. I later graduated into an M1A, which is 308. That didn't kick quite as hard, but still would leave bruises after 50+ rounds. Once the AR platform developed into the highly accurate tool it is now, I jumped into it. It was cheaper to reload, easier to maintain, and didn't make you cry when it was raining on match day. The best part though is that it didn't beat you up through the course.

One Rude Dawg Loc: Athol, ID

boberic wrote:

In the trial The prosecutor is holding the rifle in a way that would gaurantee his severe injury if he fired it. Quite obviose he never fired a rifle. He has the stock pressed so tightly against his right cheek the skin is folded over the stock. Even a slight recoil might break his jaw. The stock is also not properly positioned against his shoulder. Again a slight recoil would injure his shoulder. He is a textbook example of improper rifle usage

He is the prosecutor and will do what ever he has to to win, most of these dip s**ts have no knowledge about firearms.

letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.

boberic wrote:

If I were any where in that courtroom and that rifle was pointed at me, I would stand up and shout, as loudly as I could "POINT that weapon somewhere else" and gladly take any punishment

Likewise. The finger was inside the trigger guard, another no. I would have interrupted and complained about a prosecutor that has no idea of how to handle a gun safely.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

letmedance wrote:

Likewise. The finger was inside the trigger guard, another no. I would have interrupted and complained about a prosecutor that has no idea of how to handle a gun safely.

Guess he learned nothing about the Baldwin incident.

letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.

dennis2146 wrote:

OMG!!!!! And you would lose that as well. The district attorney was/is an i***t for even bringing Rittenhouse to trial knowing the evidence was stacked against him. His firearm handling also indicates his idiocy. But, and I mean no offense, if you cannot handle an unloaded firearm pointed at you in this specific circumstance then I think you would be laughed out of court.

Dennis

You are right but don't forget that Baldwin also had an unloaded firearm.

Rose42

Frank T wrote:

Congratulations. You've won the prize for the most asinine post of 2021.
Don't get cocky. Remember it's only November and you've got some right-wingers out there who are sure to beat you.

Don’t count yourself out of the running.

Rose42

letmedance wrote:

Likewise. The finger was inside the trigger guard, another no. I would have interrupted and complained about a prosecutor that has no idea of how to handle a gun safely.

Somebody should have spoken up right then. Unless it was first shown that it wasn’t loaded the bailiffs should have pushed the muzzle down and taken it from him immediately.