Canon EOS 5D IV and/or Canon EOS R5
Nov 10, 2021 09:24:51 #
I have both of these cameras, and I have loved the results of both, although I must say, as I learn more and more about the R5 it seems (because of the pixel count) the clarity I get is stunning. The question I have for those of you much more experience and knowledgeable than I is, is there a good case for holding onto both bodies or should I go with my original plan and sell the 5D IV (since I’ve already sunk the money into the 5D a few years ago, I’m not too concerned about the money at this point) I shoot with all EF lenses: 16-35, 24-70, 70-200, 90 TS-E, and RF 24-105. I have an adapter for all EF lenses.
I consider myself a relatively unrefined amateur. I just enjoy the daylights out of reviewing and working with the photos I take.
I’m just looking for a variety of thoughts on the matter.
I consider myself a relatively unrefined amateur. I just enjoy the daylights out of reviewing and working with the photos I take.
I’m just looking for a variety of thoughts on the matter.
Nov 10, 2021 09:28:02 #
Dump that relic of the DSLRosaur age of photography.
Then swap / consolidate as follows:
EF lenses - SELL: 16-35, 24-70, 70-200
BUY / replace with: RF 14-35 f/4L IS, RF 70-200 f/2.8L IS, RF 28-70 f/2L
Then swap / consolidate as follows:
EF lenses - SELL: 16-35, 24-70, 70-200
BUY / replace with: RF 14-35 f/4L IS, RF 70-200 f/2.8L IS, RF 28-70 f/2L
Nov 10, 2021 09:30:19 #
Nov 10, 2021 09:31:28 #
Ruthlessrider wrote:
Thanks for the comment and the laugh.
Hey, it's fun to spend your money. I was 'recalculating' my list of keep / sell lenses just yesterday after reading again about the 14-35, so the ideas are fresh in my mind. My situation is a bit more complex because of my desire to still shoot film with an EOS body. But, if you lose the EF-mount, lose the EF lenses too if money, size and weight are not a limiting factor.
Nov 10, 2021 09:33:28 #
Wish I had your kind of problem. Why not keep both and use the 5D4 as a back up.?
Nov 10, 2021 09:35:21 #
Nov 10, 2021 09:38:30 #
Ruthlessrider wrote:
Is there really a big down side to using EF lenses with the RF adapter on the R5?
The consensus is EF lenses are 'better' on EOS-R type bodies, either / or because of the higher pixel resolution of the camera or the improved precise focus abilities. But, the RF lenses are overall sharper, especially at their wider apertures as compared to their EF cousins. Lenses like the two 70-200 options are a completely new design into a smaller package. All three I listed above are 'new' in significantly different ways specific to the RF lens. The RF lenses are also designed for the 'mega' megapixels of the EOS-R bodies, while only the final series II/III lenses in the EF mount were intended for this pixel resolution.
Nov 10, 2021 10:14:27 #
Nov 10, 2021 10:49:48 #
I'm having the same dilemma. I'll probably end up selling the 5D IV but I'm holding off for now just to be sure I no longer have any use for it that justifies continuing to tie up the funds. Another factor is that used 5D prices are likely to continue being pressured due to R5 adopters selling in droves.
As for RF lenses, I did buy the 24-105 4L which is a lot better than the EF counterpart. But my research so far reveals only incremental improvements, if any, on most of the RF offerings as of now. One exception is the 85 1.2 which everyone raves about but it is a focal length I don't use that much and at 2799. (yikes!) I'll pass. The 100-500 is tempting for me but a swap from my EF 100-400 II (which is really, really good!) would likely cost 1200. or so. I am anxiously awaiting a 135 but I'm also afraid it will be a 1.8 w/IS, weigh 3 lbs. and cost 2900. I paid 640. (used) for my EF version and it is one of my favorites.
As for RF lenses, I did buy the 24-105 4L which is a lot better than the EF counterpart. But my research so far reveals only incremental improvements, if any, on most of the RF offerings as of now. One exception is the 85 1.2 which everyone raves about but it is a focal length I don't use that much and at 2799. (yikes!) I'll pass. The 100-500 is tempting for me but a swap from my EF 100-400 II (which is really, really good!) would likely cost 1200. or so. I am anxiously awaiting a 135 but I'm also afraid it will be a 1.8 w/IS, weigh 3 lbs. and cost 2900. I paid 640. (used) for my EF version and it is one of my favorites.
Nov 10, 2021 10:59:03 #
I forgot to mention that I recently purchased the RF 800 and, wow, I’m impressed with eh clarity at such a reasonable price.
Nov 10, 2021 11:08:32 #
If money is not an issue, keep both. Some people say the 5D mk IV is no longer relevant but they are wrong. It is still a fine camera capable of excellent quality images. By having two high end bodies, you can bring two cameras with different lenses when you go out shooting. Our resident one liner may feel the 5D mk IV is past it's time, but that's strictly his opinion, and not reality at all. Yes, the R5 is an excellent camera with higher resolution and more functionality than its older sibling, so this should be your primary camera, especially for video. The 5DIV is an excellent secondary camera to the R5 and with your lens collection and adapter, you're set for both bodies.
Nov 10, 2021 11:18:08 #
Nov 11, 2021 07:05:33 #
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
Ruthlessrider wrote:
I have both of these cameras, and I have loved the... (show quote)
I see you have just over 250 posts, so I will go easy.
The two cannot be more dis alike. If money were no object the choice is clear, un mistakable, no brainer, easy as pie, all in, peddle to the floor, no brainer, chip shot, lay up, fast ball in the middle of the plate, no holes barred, slam dunk.
Nov 11, 2021 07:42:45 #
Someone asked the same question recently, so I'm prepared.
https://cameradecision.com/compare/Canon-EOS-R5-vs-Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-IV
https://snapshot.canon-asia.com/india/article/en/9-reasons-to-switch-to-eos-r5-from-eos-5d-mark-iv
https://www.djzphoto.com/blog/2020/9/23/canon-eos-r5-vs-5d-mark-iv-canon-has-upped-their-shadows-game
https://fstoppers.com/gear/should-you-upgrade-canon-eos-r5-5d-mark-iv-507577
https://cameradecision.com/compare/Canon-EOS-R5-vs-Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-IV
https://snapshot.canon-asia.com/india/article/en/9-reasons-to-switch-to-eos-r5-from-eos-5d-mark-iv
https://www.djzphoto.com/blog/2020/9/23/canon-eos-r5-vs-5d-mark-iv-canon-has-upped-their-shadows-game
https://fstoppers.com/gear/should-you-upgrade-canon-eos-r5-5d-mark-iv-507577
Nov 11, 2021 08:08:31 #
jackpinoh
Loc: Kettering, OH 45419
Ruthlessrider wrote:
I have both of these cameras, and I have loved the... (show quote)
The only reason to keep the 5D iv is as a backup camera if you are in a workshop away from home. (i.e., you paid $$$ for a 4-day workshop in Yellowstone). Off course, as you replace your EF lenses, this will no longer be an option and it will make more sense to rent or buy a backup camera.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.