P****r Claims V*****e Will Reduce Average Daily Child C***D Deaths From Almost Zero To Almost Zero
NEW YORK, NY—In a moment celebrated by all hard-working lobbyists, P****r announced that the C****-** v*****e will reduce average daily child C***D deaths from almost zero all the way down to almost zero.
“These are phenomenal results. Our internal studies have proven a microscopic benefit to an even more microscopic risk to children,” stated Dee Pimbly, head of P****r’s Department of Propaganda to a crowd of journalists who have not allowed their own children to bask in the warm glow of sunlight, or interact with other children for almost no reason whatsoever.
FDA officials praised P****r for fighting a v***s that is the leading k**ler of children after cancer, vehicular accidents, suicide, heart disease, drowning, suffocation, the flu, meteors from space, and slipping on a banana peel. Experts say the v*****e will probably k**l more kids than it saves, but it's ok because science.
When asked about any safety concerns, an FDA official replied, “We’re excited to start giving it to them so we can find out.”
https://babylonbee.com/news/p****r-claims-v*****e-will-reduce-average-daily-child-c***d-deaths-from-almost-zero-to-almost-zero
soba1
Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
Evil knows no bounds. Maybe if children start dying people will wake up
soba1 wrote:
Evil knows no bounds. Maybe if children start dying people will wake up
Certainly an evil statement.
sb
Loc: Florida's East Coast
More deaths than chickenpox, for which we v******te kids. Most adults are immune, so this v******tion is much more questionable, but most people think that even a few hundred preventable child deaths per year is too many. But a major point of childhood C***D v******tions is NOT to prevent childhood deaths, but to stop the p******c. Of course, we also do not k ow what long-term effects children who have recovered from C***D may have. This can be not just the "long-haul" symptoms that we have been reading about, but other problems - for example, people who were infants exposed to the "Spanish Flu" were 2 to 3 times more likely to develop Parkinson's Disease later in life than those who were not.
boberic
Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
sb wrote:
More deaths than chickenpox, for which we v******te kids. Most adults are immune, so this v******tion is much more questionable, but most people think that even a few hundred preventable child deaths per year is too many. But a major point of childhood C***D v******tions is NOT to prevent childhood deaths, but to stop the p******c. Of course, we also do not k ow what long-term effects children who have recovered from C***D may have. This can be not just the "long-haul" symptoms that we have been reading about, but other problems - for example, people who were infants exposed to the "Spanish Flu" were 2 to 3 times more likely to develop Parkinson's Disease later in life than those who were not.
More deaths than chickenpox, for which we v******t... (
show quote)
So we v******te children because of what MIGHT happen to them 50 years in the future? Thats sorta like not letting 18year olds drive because some might die in a car crash in their 50's. FACT--More young kids die each year of the seasonal flu than of c***d
Watosh wrote:
Funny!! I love the BB!
It is funny. But even humor starts arguments. Lol
soba1
Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
flip1948 wrote:
Certainly an evil statement.
Well it’s k*****g a lot of grown ups
If you support mandates own this one, leave the children alone.
boberic
Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
soba1 wrote:
Well it’s k*****g a lot of grown ups
If you support mandates own this one, leave the children alone.
I don't support FEDERAL mandates. And c***d is dangerous for only 2 groups. Those with co-morbidities, andt those over 65. For others the risk of dying is less than 0.1 % About the same as dying in a car crash. A 99.9 % survival rate
soba1 wrote:
Evil knows no bounds. Maybe if children start dying people will wake up
Is that what you hope for? No accusations here, but that is what your post sounds like.
boberic wrote:
I don't support FEDERAL mandates. And c***d is dangerous for only 2 groups. Those with co-morbidities, andt those over 65. For others the risk of dying is less than 0.1 % About the same as dying in a car crash. A 99.9 % survival rate
You say that all the time, but those two groups represent a large number of people.
soba1
Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
thom w wrote:
Is that what you hope for? No accusations here, but that is what your post sounds like.
Leave the darn children alone 😡
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.