This hypocrite, anti-gunner needs to be charged with criminal negligence.
idaholover wrote:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_breakingnews/alec-baldwin-issues-first-public-response-after-firing-prop-gun-that-k**led-photography-director_4063713.html?utm_source=News&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2021-10-22-3&mktids=4aa28054ca936453a4e61d59014240d9&est=HTLhZw3YpL6zOWIzQMJak1XM7eE99s%2BhYjsYj757BSvrynmMhhRSK%2FyxNVQKRumAA1g%3D
Do to this POS what he has advocated to do to us mere mortals who own firearms.
Charge him with involuntary manslaughter, at a minimum, and then throw him in jail.
Then have the dead woman's husband file a huge wrongful death suit against this turd.
Architect1776 wrote:
Do to this POS what he has advocated to do to us mere mortals who own firearms.
Charge him with involuntary manslaughter, at a minimum, and then throw him in jail.
Then have the dead woman's husband file a huge wrongful death suit against this turd.
Apparently these anti-gun experts know NOTHING about firearm safety. Getting Alec Baldwin into an NRA safety class would be like getting a priest to administer the Communion sacrament to baby k**ler Beijiing Joe Biden.
idaholover wrote:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_breakingnews/alec-baldwin-issues-first-public-response-after-firing-prop-gun-that-k**led-photography-director_4063713.html?utm_source=News&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2021-10-22-3&mktids=4aa28054ca936453a4e61d59014240d9&est=HTLhZw3YpL6zOWIzQMJak1XM7eE99s%2BhYjsYj757BSvrynmMhhRSK%2FyxNVQKRumAA1g%3D
His career is probably over. I'm really sorry for the family of the woman that was k**led and the wounded person.
Someone is going to own his a$$! Being a total jerk and a$$hole with and to people sometimes brings Karma
down on the jerk. Pay-back is a bit@h!
The thought occurred to me that someone who was tired of how he treated people may have set him up.
However, apparently, he had to pull the trigger. Why was the gun pointed at someone in the crew?
That had to be his fault.
Watosh wrote:
His career is probably over. I'm really sorry for the family of the woman that was k**led and the wounded person.
Someone is going to own his a$$! Being a total jerk and a$$hole with and to people sometimes brings Karma
down on the jerk. Pay-back is a bit@h!
The thought occurred to me that someone who was tired of how he treated people may have set him up.
However, apparently, he had to pull the trigger. Why was the gun pointed at someone in the crew?
That had to be his fault.
Ya but he is a wonderful Democrat!
Watosh wrote:
His career is probably over. I'm really sorry for the family of the woman that was k**led and the wounded person.
Someone is going to own his a$$! Being a total jerk and a$$hole with and to people sometimes brings Karma
down on the jerk. Pay-back is a bit@h!
The thought occurred to me that someone who was tired of how he treated people may have set him up.
However, apparently, he had to pull the trigger. Why was the gun pointed at someone in the crew?
That had to be his fault.
It is not uncommon in movies for the gun to be pointed at the camera, giving the audience the sensation the gun was pointed at them. The camera operators job is thus in the line of (supposedly safe) fire. The director is often directly behind the camera operator. The wound to the camera operator was a through-and-through, continuing on to also hit and wound the director.
idaholover wrote:
Apparently these anti-gun experts know NOTHING about firearm safety. Getting Alec Baldwin into an NRA safety class would be like getting a priest to administer the Communion sacrament to baby k**ler Beijiing Joe Biden.
No one h**es like a right wing conservative.
DennyT
Loc: Central Missouri woods
The latest is the movie armor laid three guns on a table and not watched over them.
Another assistant director picked up, gave it to Baldwin and told him it was loaded with blanks.
Lots of blame to go around .
You know the rest., involuntary manslaughter May be appropriate.
But to make it gun argument is stupid and inconsiderate .
idaholover wrote:
Ya but he is a wonderful Democrat!
Um-huh. They will circle the wagons and somehow use this for more gun control or banning altogether.
Having taught H****r Safety and Gun Safety for years, it seems to me the problem here was "gun
control", (Always keep the muzzle pointed in a safe direction!) An arrogant, know it all jerk doesn't mix well with tools.
Watosh wrote:
His career is probably over.
Nah. He's protected, being a member of the U.S. royalty class. He's therefore immune to the rules, regulations and restraints that apply to mere mortals.
thomseninc wrote:
It is not uncommon in movies for the gun to be pointed at the camera, giving the audience the sensation the gun was pointed at them.
But established safety protocols require a specially trained Weapons Master to first inspect the gun and then test-fire the gun offstage, before handing to the actor. Also, when firing directly at the camera, either a remote camera should be used and/or to have a thick PERSPEX screen in front of the camera to protect equipment and personnel.
Kmgw9v wrote:
No one h**es like a right wing conservative.
Except for left-wing democrat progressives as exemplified by the vitriol spewing from the mouths of the Squad and their ilk.
Or Alex Baldwin's own snarky tweet mocking a police shooting (that was later ruled as justified) when in 2017 he said
"I wonder how it must feel to wrongfully k**l someone." Well Alex, tell us.
thomseninc wrote:
It is not uncommon in movies for the gun to be pointed at the camera, giving the audience the sensation the gun was pointed at them. The camera operators job is thus in the line of (supposedly safe) fire. The director is often directly behind the camera operator. The wound to the camera operator was a through-and-through, continuing on to also hit and wound the director.
You missed my post on this and the link.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.