New source of pollution
Oct 20, 2021 14:56:59 #
As electric vehicles become more popular more lithium batterys will be made. Problem is they will add, in a big way to pollution. There is no good way to despose of all those batterys. There will be a very serious risk of explosions. Lithium, as photographers know, batterys have a life before they will not recharge. This will oresent a very big problem. They can't be put in some kind of garbage dump. they are toxic and will tend to explode. So maybe no CO2 polution, but a big problem anyway
Oct 20, 2021 17:28:37 #
Nothing is perfect, but lithium batteries aren't in the process of destroying the planet.
Oct 20, 2021 18:01:41 #
National Park wrote:
Nothing is perfect, but lithium batteries aren't in the process of destroying the planet.
Neither are internal combustion engines.
Oct 20, 2021 18:13:20 #
Oct 20, 2021 18:17:31 #
National Park wrote:
Nothing is perfect, but lithium batteries aren't in the process of destroying the planet.
Apparently you cant or wont read. All I said was that Li batteries as they get more nunerous will add to pollution. I did not wsay they would destroy the the planet Only the sun when it becomes nova will destroy the planet
Oct 20, 2021 18:22:54 #
boberic wrote:
Apparently you cant or wont read. All I said was that Li batteries as they get more nunerous will add to pollution. I did not wsay they would destroy the the planet Only the sun when it becomes nova will destroy the planet
That Won't won't happen either
Oct 20, 2021 19:01:26 #
btbg wrote:
Neither are internal combustion engines.
Yes they are. You may be in a state of denial but the science is clear. Science doesn’t care about your opinion.
Oct 20, 2021 23:24:16 #
National Park wrote:
Yes they are. You may be in a state of denial but the science is clear. Science doesn’t care about your opinion.
Internal combustion engines pollute. They are not destroying the world. The world is a far better place because of the internal combustion engine than it was before it.
And, the science is not clear. You can find plenty of scientists that question what impact man has on c*****e c****e.
Oct 21, 2021 00:01:19 #
dirtpusher wrote:
That Won't won't happen either
Actually the sun will go nova. Not a matter of IF but only when. Perhaps in a billion or so years. Happens to all stars
Oct 21, 2021 02:01:57 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
National Park wrote:
Yes they are. You may be in a state of denial but the science is clear. Science doesn’t care about your opinion.
How can YOU ay the science is clear when you know nothing about science?
Oct 21, 2021 04:40:17 #
btbg wrote:
Internal combustion engines pollute. They are not destroying the world. The world is a far better place because of the internal combustion engine than it was before it.
That is the most i***tic statement I have ever read.
Oct 21, 2021 06:00:44 #
btbg wrote:
Internal combustion engines pollute. They are not destroying the world. The world is a far better place because of the internal combustion engine than it was before it.
And, the science is not clear. You can find plenty of scientists that question what impact man has on c*****e c****e.
And, the science is not clear. You can find plenty of scientists that question what impact man has on c*****e c****e.
“Plenty” of scientists? Most are paid by the f****l f**l industry. Show me some peer reviewed articles that question co2’s impact on c*****e c****e. There are short term and long term impacts. Short term: has improved life for humans ( but not other species). Long term: terrible impacts on earth.
Oct 21, 2021 08:03:38 #
National Park wrote:
“Plenty” of scientists? Most are paid by the f****l f**l industry. Show me some peer reviewed articles that question co2’s impact on c*****e c****e. There are short term and long term impacts. Short term: has improved life for humans ( but not other species). Long term: terrible impacts on earth.
LOL.... And the other scientists are funded by governments which are salivating over the opportunity for authoritarian rule under the guise of C*****e C****e mitigation.
Oct 21, 2021 08:58:27 #
Blurryeyed wrote:
LOL.... And the other scientists are funded by governments which are salivating over the opportunity for authoritarian rule under the guise of C*****e C****e mitigation.
I figured it was only a matter of time before someone would start blathering about authoritarian rule and scientists funded by governments can't be trusted and you didn't disappoint. But you took it to new heights: it is a conspiracy of all the governments in the world for authoritarian rule!
It is odd that you apparently consider scientists funded by the f****l f**l industry to be more credible than scientists funded by government. You probably also believed that scientists funded by the tobacco industry were more credible than scientists funded by the government.
Oct 21, 2021 08:59:00 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.