John Maher Loc: Northern Virginia

I know the 454 replaced the 3419. They look the same and the 3419 ads sometimes even use a 454 picture.

When such a change in model number occurs, the difference is often either an improvement and/or reduced manufacturing cost.

Has anyone owned both?

I just cannot find any reason for changing the model number.

pendennis

As I understand it, when Lester Bogen was the importer for Manfrotto, he used a 4-digit code for the products (3001/3201, 3036/3236, 3051/3251); 30xx for brushed aluminum, and 32 for black anodized. Manfrotto, for non-US distribution, always used their 3-digit model numbers.

After Bogen went out of business, and Manfrotto became the U.S. distributor, they reverted to their native model number system. The 3035 became the 427, etc. They probably ran the Bogen stock to exhaustion, then used their numbering system, from then onward. Some items were discontinued when they became obsolete. I own a number of 3047 tripod heads. When that model became obsolete, Manfrotto only used their new 3-digit model designation.

Nikon, for instance, did something similar for their 35mm AF SLR's. The N90 was F90 other than U.S.

Model number differentials also help identify U.S.-imported models, from "Global-sold" (gray market) models.

John Maher Loc: Northern Virginia

Thanks -- That makes sense.

It's more than just technology -- the answer may be in product history!

E.L.. Shapiro Loc: Ottawa, Ontario Canada

Definitely the SAME device- just a change in item number designations.

imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida

and/or product ownership ...

KTJohnson Loc: Northern Michigan

The difference is 2965.

I couldn't help it.

Sidwalkastronomy Loc: New Jersey Shore

He gave you a softball and you hit it out of the park.

Mustanger Loc: Grants Pass, Oregon USA

Now why did't I think of that response!?? Just my kind of humor!