Will Full Frame kill off APS-C ? Youtuber David McKeegan gives his thoughts.
Sep 27, 2021 10:17:53 #
Will Full Frame kill off APS-C ?
David McKeegan gives his thoughts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3kpHeaZXyI
Cheers
David McKeegan gives his thoughts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3kpHeaZXyI
Cheers
Sep 27, 2021 10:46:30 #
gwilliams6 wrote:
Will Full Frame kill off APS-C ?
David McKeegan gives his thoughts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3kpHeaZXyI
Cheers
David McKeegan gives his thoughts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3kpHeaZXyI
Cheers
Will Mr Williams ever learn to follow the rules and post his links in the "Links and Resources" section?
Sep 27, 2021 10:52:37 #
gwilliams6 wrote:
Will Full Frame kill off APS-C ?
David McKeegan gives his thoughts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3kpHeaZXyI
Cheers
David McKeegan gives his thoughts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3kpHeaZXyI
Cheers
I was just out on the beach and all the guys had either R5s or A1s. I am standing there with a 7DMkll. Maybe!? Felt like an outcast?!
Sep 27, 2021 11:21:00 #
Interesting video... Some valid points made, esp. re: Canon and its possible mirrorless future roadmaps. I personally like my FF and APS-C kit because of the mix and match focal length versatility... But, with prices and size reductions in mirrorless on the way, one might say WHY APS-C in the future. What say you all ?
Sep 27, 2021 11:25:53 #
Bill_de wrote:
Will Mr Williams ever learn to follow the rules and post his links in the "Links and Resources" section?
If you use the “Report Issue” button, moddy can relocate this material to a safer place before it gets to 18 pages.
David McKeegan’s material is basically nuclear waste. Consider the sources.
Sep 27, 2021 11:35:04 #
Bill_de wrote:
Will Mr Williams ever learn to follow the rules and post his links in the "Links and Resources" section?
It took me a while to realize that anything I posted here that had a link ended up getting moved to Links and Resources - never to be heard from again. I try not posting links any more in this forum, but sometimes with I wish I could. I understand that some posts are just intended to provide a resource, but I don't understand the total prohibition of posting a link if the purpose is to just support a conversation about a particular topic and not necessarily provide a link as a resource.
Sep 27, 2021 11:40:32 #
Basil wrote:
It took me a while to realize that anything I posted here that had a link ended up getting moved to Links and Resources - never to be heard from again. I try not posting links any more in this forum, .........
So, as you can see, the policy is reasonably effective.
Sep 27, 2021 11:50:26 #
fehutch
Loc: gulfport, ms
U tube posts largely strike me as hi-tech Facebook if it’s opinions as opposed to something useful like “how to” something. I thing the policy is working. I divorced Facebook and media opinions. Enjoy forming my own and only share when asked,
Sep 27, 2021 11:56:22 #
User ID wrote:
So, as you can see, the policy is reasonably effective.
Yes, it's effective in keeping any links from being posted in the general discussion forum and I try my best to adhere to it. I just don't see the necessity or purpose of a total prohibition on posting a link if it is meant to support a broader conversation. Not as many people look in "Links and Resources" for general conversations. If you post a conversation about whether Full Frame will kill the APS-C, but you don't post a link to the source, then that is ok, but if you dare post a link the post is banished from here. I just don't think the total purging of any links is necessary That's just my opinion.
Sep 27, 2021 12:40:29 #
I really don't see what all the hoopla about WHERE so and so should be posted etc... The question posed is a valid one irregardless of who did the video or WHAT section it was posted on.It would be a lot more constructive to focus on what points were brought up and comment on substance instead of delivery methods... Just my opinion, but the video brought up good points.
Sep 27, 2021 13:30:54 #
MrBob wrote:
I really don't see what all the hoopla about WHERE so and so should be posted etc... The question posed is a valid one irregardless of who did the video or WHAT section it was posted on.It would be a lot more constructive to focus on what points were brought up and comment on substance instead of delivery methods... Just my opinion, but the video brought up good points.
The medium really is the message.
Sep 27, 2021 13:39:36 #
Sep 27, 2021 13:52:46 #
MrBob wrote:
I really don't see what all the hoopla about WHERE so and so should be posted etc... The question posed is a valid one irregardless of who did the video or WHAT section it was posted on.It would be a lot more constructive to focus on what points were brought up and comment on substance instead of delivery methods... Just my opinion, but the video brought up good points.
There are no “valid points” in such garbage. Consider the source, and consider the purpose.
Sep 27, 2021 14:21:51 #
MrBob wrote:
I really don't see what all the hoopla about WHERE so and so should be posted etc... The question posed is a valid one irregardless of who did the video or WHAT section it was posted on.It would be a lot more constructive to focus on what points were brought up and comment on substance instead of delivery methods... Just my opinion, but the video brought up good points.
Maybe you are right. Tell admin we don't need rules. We'll just post whatever we want, wherever we want.
----
Sep 27, 2021 15:47:46 #
Bill_de wrote:
Will Mr Williams ever learn to follow the rules and post his links in the "Links and Resources" section?
All kinds of such DISCUSSIONS in the main UHH section. You comment on those all the time. I just started the discussion with a linked video. Not breaking any rules. lol
Cheers
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.