Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Sand................
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Sep 29, 2021 07:44:03   #
tcthome Loc: NJ
 
Nice photos.

Reply
Sep 29, 2021 09:29:46   #
gvarner Loc: Central Oregon Coast
 
A bulb blower used judiciously around the lens mount would help on cleanup. Then remove the lens with the body facing down and wipe the mounting face off body and lens. Both of those bodies are pretty bullet proof.

Reply
Sep 29, 2021 12:44:53   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
billnikon wrote:
I guess shooting from my armchair in nice weather will only produce safe shots? Oh whoa is me. I am not sure what I am going to do now. I guess my armchair will get well worn over the next couple of years.


Times change. There was a pro Canon camera that was lost during an ejection from a jet at 15,000 feet over the desert. It was found a few years later. The lens was toast, but the body still worked after the film was removed (how they located the photographer) and the body cleaned off. That was an exception, not the rule, even back then.

Olympus and Panasonic asked photographers what they would like in a camera late in the first decade of this century. Weatherproofing and sealing from dust and sand were two of the items they decided to address. Now other manufacturers are meeting that demand too.

And I have shot in blowing sands of Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve with the exposed arms and legs getting sandblasted. Yes, I took what precautions I could like limiting the camera's exposure to the blasting sand. I have shot in the rain and salt spray of the beaches and boats of Hawaii and Caribbean. But I was not going to stop shooting because of the blowing dust, sand, and salt spray. And the camera and lens still work today because they were designed to do so. Will an E-M1 mkII or D850 survive a 15,000 foot drop into the desert sand like the Canon did? I doubt they would. But when the manufacturers say their cameras are built to withstand the elements, one should hold their "feet to the fire".

Reply
 
 
Sep 29, 2021 13:09:08   #
User ID
 
b top gun wrote:
................ got sand blasted a couple of days. Got sand in my hair, behind my ears, inside my shirt collar, inside the pockets of my rain jacket, and of course my D850 and D7100 got exposed as well. ................

I used a very lightly dampened clean face cloth and wiped down the exteriors of cameras and lens bodies as best as I could. Any suggestions moving forward? ....................
.

Delete the heated drying cycle !!!
Delete the heated drying cycle !!!...
(Download)

Reply
Sep 29, 2021 14:02:10   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
wdross wrote:
Times change. There was a pro Canon camera that was lost during an ejection from a jet at 15,000 feet over the desert. It was found a few years later. The lens was toast, but the body still worked after the film was removed (how they located the photographer) and the body cleaned off. That was an exception, not the rule, even back then.

Olympus and Panasonic asked photographers what they would like in a camera late in the first decade of this century. Weatherproofing and sealing from dust and sand were two of the items they decided to address. Now other manufacturers are meeting that demand too.

And I have shot in blowing sands of Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve with the exposed arms and legs getting sandblasted. Yes, I took what precautions I could like limiting the camera's exposure to the blasting sand. I have shot in the rain and salt spray of the beaches and boats of Hawaii and Caribbean. But I was not going to stop shooting because of the blowing dust, sand, and salt spray. And the camera and lens still work today because they were designed to do so. Will an E-M1 mkII or D850 survive a 15,000 foot drop into the desert sand like the Canon did? I doubt they would. But when the manufacturers say their cameras are built to withstand the elements, one should hold their "feet to the fire".
Times change. There was a pro Canon camera that wa... (show quote)



Reply
Sep 30, 2021 12:34:31   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
b top gun wrote:
Was on a Nikon holiday and got sand blasted a couple of days. Got sand in my hair, behind my ears, inside my shirt collar, inside the pockets of my rain jacket, and of course my D850 and D7100 got exposed as well. Where I was at had three days of "hazardous seas marine advisories". Afternoon winds 20 to 30 knots, gusting higher at times. Great wave action, at a price!!! Have not unmounted the lenses from those bodies yet. At night, in my hotel room, I used a very lightly dampened clean face cloth and wiped down the exteriors of cameras and lens bodies as best as I could. Any suggestions moving forward? Upon inspection my equipment looks to be clean. My concern is the lens mount area on both Nikon bodies.
Was on a Nikon holiday and got sand blasted a coup... (show quote)


I could be wrong, but I believe that the D850 is listed as weatherproof. I do not know about the D7100 listing. If your lenses are also listed as weatherproof, just make sure the lens mount areas of both the lenses and bodies are clean and dry and continue shooting. When my Olympus weatherproof lenses and bodies get dusty and salt sprayed, I rinse them under a gently running faucet and towel dry. Do not separate the lens from the body until they have been cleaned up. Once dry, the lens mount areas of the body and lens can be cleaned more if necessary.

Reply
Sep 30, 2021 13:11:29   #
User ID
 
wdross wrote:
I could be wrong, but I believe that the D850 is listed as weatherproof. I do not know about the D7100 listing. If your lenses are also listed as weatherproof, just make sure the lens mount areas of both the lenses and bodies are clean and dry and continue shooting. When my Olympus weatherproof lenses and bodies get dusty and salt sprayed, I rinse them under a gently running faucet and towel dry. Do not separate the lens from the body until they have been cleaned up. Once dry, the lens mount areas of the body and lens can be cleaned more if necessary.
I could be wrong, but I believe that the D850 is l... (show quote)

IIRC “weather” is temperature, wind and precipitation. Salt water is not weather, and neither is sand. Acoarst any level of protection is better than none.

Reply
 
 
Sep 30, 2021 14:33:13   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
User ID wrote:
IIRC “weather” is temperature, wind and precipitation. Salt water is not weather, and neither is sand. Acoarst any level of protection is better than none.


I can promise you my camera has been soaked with salt spray. And Olympus also advertises the cameras (except the E-M10) and weatherproof lenses as specifically dustproof. Dustproof may not be in IIRC, but it is in Olympus's advertising. Of course, I will always protect my cameras as much as I can from any of the elements, but I do not shy away from using it in any of the elements. And I do not leave any of the elements on the camera and remove the elements as soon as possible. And look at their advertising photos with water, snow, dirt, and mud all over the lenses and bodies. I have easily lost count of how many times my camera has looked like the water shots in those ads. And although my cameras have not been muddy like the ads yet, they have been very dusty and dirty. Will it fail sometime in the future? There is always a chance of failure with any brand of camera. But my bet is on Olympus's weatherproofing to protect me from the elements.

Reply
Sep 30, 2021 19:05:30   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
wdross wrote:
I can promise you my camera has been soaked with salt spray. And Olympus also advertises the cameras (except the E-M10) and weatherproof lenses as specifically dustproof. Dustproof may not be in IIRC, but it is in Olympus's advertising. Of course, I will always protect my cameras as much as I can from any of the elements, but I do not shy away from using it in any of the elements. And I do not leave any of the elements on the camera and remove the elements as soon as possible. And look at their advertising photos with water, snow, dirt, and mud all over the lenses and bodies. I have easily lost count of how many times my camera has looked like the water shots in those ads. And although my cameras have not been muddy like the ads yet, they have been very dusty and dirty. Will it fail sometime in the future? There is always a chance of failure with any brand of camera. But my bet is on Olympus's weatherproofing to protect me from the elements.
I can promise you my camera has been soaked with s... (show quote)


I’ll take that bet. I too use Olympus, for years now, and in similar environments and ways as you describe and I have not had any problems.

Reply
Oct 1, 2021 02:30:31   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
User ID wrote:
IIRC “weather” is temperature, wind and precipitation. Salt water is not weather, and neither is sand. Acoarst any level of protection is better than none.


I am not sure of the other bodies, but my new E-M1 mkIII is rated as IPX1 for weather resistance. I believe it is a higher rating than IIRC. Either way, at some level of increasing camera abuse all cameras will fail. It will just take longer and much more abuse before some cameras will get there. Like you stated, a camera without any weatherproofing will fail quicker than any camera rated as IIRC or IPX1.

Reply
Oct 1, 2021 16:30:37   #
User ID
 
I wonder how IPX1 relates to IIRC.

Reply
 
 
Oct 2, 2021 09:57:19   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
User ID wrote:
I wonder how IPX1 relates to IIRC.


It goes to 11.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.