Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Filters used for Fall Colors?
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
Sep 24, 2021 16:03:21   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
I thought it would be fun to summarize. So far, in 4 pages of replies the recommendations are:

Polarizer (13)
Color Enhance (5)
Rainy Days (4)
WB/Software (4)
ND (2)
Warming (2)
Nothing (2)
UV (1)
Camera Fall Setting (1)

Reply
Sep 24, 2021 16:24:34   #
joecichjr Loc: Chicago S. Suburbs, Illinois, USA
 
E.L.. Shapiro wrote:
What some folk don't seem to comprehend is that a colour enhancing filter will indeed enhance specific colours while desaturating, neutralizing, or simply stated, muddying up other colours, A filter that is designed to enhance yellows and reds may gray down the blue sky. This is because the filter colour-biases the entire scene. The leaves on a birch tree may be enhanced in an autumn scene but the gray bark will record as yellow/red.

I have some experience with didymium filters. In my industrial photography, I oftentimes find myself shootg in factories, warehouses and other industrial installations that are lighted with sodium vapour lamps. Prior to the advent of high output LED lamps, sodium vapour lamps were extremely popular in the industrial environment in that they produce more lumens per watt. Much of this light is still in use. These lamps have discontinues spectrums so they played havoc with colour films so many layers of gel filters, on the lens, were employed to somewhat normalize the colour rendition. Without the filtration, the film would produce a significant green, cyan, or cyan/gree shift. Sometimes a FLD or FLB filter usually used to correct for some fluorescent lighting would facilitate enough correction to enable tweaking in the printing of colour negatives. Transparency fils were still difficult to correct with massive filter packs. Enter didymium filters! Some corrections were notable but backgrounds, people, and other elements in the scene aside from the subject were seriously muddied in colour rendition. The extent of the effect of these filters is determined by their thickness. The thicker filter had more artifacts. I am sure these filers have an important function in scientific photography, medical imaging, photomicrography, and astrological photoghay and some practical usage in landscape work but there are caveats.

Oftentimes, with all kinds of filters, the transmission data, as to which segment of the spectrum are transmitted or blocked, look good on paper but because of variations on film, digital sensors and all kinds of odd and mixed light sources, the data do not always translate into the good colour correctness. Usually, some experimentation is required to zero in on the exact method.

Not surprisingly, in digital photography, I have been able to solve most colour balance issues with a custom white balance or even an automated white balance adjustment, even under what was previously, with film, a massive headache. As for colour intensification via reflection control and negation, the CPL filter is my favourite tool- a good filter has no artifacts, all colours remain true and saturated, and minor tweaks can be easily applied in post-processing.

If you don't like the effect of a CPL filter, or it is not necessary under certain lighting conditions, simply do not use it. In my own work, there are many occasions where I have to shoot a particular out-of-doors scene, an architectural exterior, or something on an industrial or construction site, and I have no choice as to the time of day. Even in the studio, under controlled conditions, there are many items that requre precise reflection control so suffice it to say that my collection of CPL filters are well used. I even had to replace a few that were just worn out, had delaminated, or just fell apart from hard usage on hazardous industrial sites.

Attached is a shot of a commemorative postage stamp collection and accompanying book. This is not a montage shot- the stamps were carefully mounted in small blocks of Foam-Cor and suspend on a makeshift rack. The stamp is printed in a caly-coated stock that is very reflective. The CPL filter saved the day and a hold lot of extensive retouching.
What some folk don't seem to comprehend is that a ... (show quote)


Dazzlingly beautiful and eye-catching
💙🧡💚💛❤️💜

Reply
Sep 24, 2021 18:13:52   #
Alafoto Loc: Montgomery, AL
 
wdross wrote:
Not totally true about no longer useful in the digital age. It can be still used for regular autumn photography even though the effect can be simulated in PP. As I said, I am a fan of doing everything possible in camera before any post processing.

The biggest use of didymium filters now is used in glass making and astrophotography The didymium selectively blocks the yellowish light at 589 nm emitted by hot sodium (sodium is used in glass making). In astrophotography, it helps to cut out the sodium vapor street lights during photography in light polluted areas.
Not totally true about no longer useful in the dig... (show quote)


You are quire right about the use of the enhancing filter for digital photography. I shoot only in raw which requires some tweaking of almost every shot, and a lot of it for some. For me, the effects of the filter in fall colors can be mostly duplicated in post, hence came the no longer useful statement.

Reply
 
 
Sep 25, 2021 07:53:54   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
I've never used filters. If the leaves don't provide enough color, I don't bother with pictures.

Reply
Sep 25, 2021 10:37:12   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
jerryc41 wrote:
I've never used filters. If the leaves don't provide enough color, I don't bother with pictures.


Nothing has 3 votes now.

Reply
Sep 25, 2021 14:42:24   #
Rmccully
 
I use a polarizer with falls colors. I like the result. I never use an ND filter for fall colors unless I am shooting rivers and waterfalls in the fall.

Reply
Sep 26, 2021 21:37:56   #
rgrenaderphoto Loc: Hollywood, CA
 
bigguytf wrote:
Will be taking some Fall Color pics over the next Month. Does taking these pics require any special filters?
Does bright sun, clear skies or cloudy skies affect the type of filter used.

I normally tries to keep filters simple, I have UV, Polarized, and a neutral density filter currently in my bag.

Thanks in advance for any input


As an update, I spoke with a Breakthrough Photography rep about their filters. She recommended trying their night sky astro filter for enhancing colors in fall foilage.

Reply
 
 
Sep 27, 2021 18:27:06   #
Bridges Loc: Memphis, Charleston SC, now Nazareth PA
 
bigguytf wrote:
Will be taking some Fall Color pics over the next Month. Does taking these pics require any special filters?
Does bright sun, clear skies or cloudy skies affect the type of filter used.

I normally tries to keep filters simple, I have UV, Polarized, and a neutral density filter currently in my bag.

Thanks in advance for any input


The standard back in film days was the Tiffen 812 for enhancing fall colors. If you are shooting in jpeg, it would be a good filter to use and you can monitor the results instantly. If you are shooting in RAW, you do not need any color enhancing filter since that can be done in post processing. I can't believe no one mentioned this filter before. I can understand the younger group that never experienced film photography but the Tiffen 812 was very popular with people shooting fall colors in film days. Like I said it will help if shooting jpegs and will also give you a good preview of what you are capturing which you can see on the fly. Otherwise you have to do your PP to bring out the best colors and that works best with RAW shots.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.