BadPhoto wrote:
The nature of humanity is to k**l. History shows that.
I'm not proposing to k**l these i***ts. I'm just hoping they die.
You proved my point. And you are no smarter than they nor is your life worth more than anyone else’s
cwp3420 wrote:
You must be a very sad individual, worrying about hundreds of thousands of people dying all over the world daily. No wonder you’re always so cranky.
Because I post my concern about a p******c k*****g thousands of people worldwide—over 650,000 deaths in this country, almost 2000 people a day; you judge me to be a “very sad individual”. You know nothing.
Where are your priorities?
Rose42 wrote:
You proved my point. And you are no smarter than they nor is your life worth more than anyone else’s
No-vaxers don't give a damn about your life or anyone else's, so to hell with them.
Kraken wrote:
No-vaxers don't give a damn about your life or anyone else's, so to hell with them.
That statement is pure propaganda and not true. Some of you are irrational
Rose42 wrote:
You proved my point. And you are no smarter than they nor is your life worth more than anyone else’s
No, you are the one being irrational and inhumane about C***D. You clearly don't care who dies. I do. I think the people that should die are the ones that are acting irresponsibly; that is justice.
As to your second statement; so you think everyone has the same intelligence and worth? The first part is wrong on the face of it. The second means you assign no value to responsibility.
People that care get v******ted, wear masks, and keep their distance not just to avoid getting infected but also to avoid t***smitting the v***s. Lots of people have no symptoms; they can spread the disease if they don't act responsibly.
People that don't care just ignore mitigations, discount the death rates, and argue that life goes on. At least until they get critically ill and beg to be saved.
The worst sort are those that publicly argue against mitigation. They are true k**lers; their followers are risking sickness and death. That is the sort of person you are.
Rose42 wrote:
That statement is pure propaganda and not true. Some of you are irrational
How do you figure, it's black and white, no gray areas. They don't care about you or anyone else-period.
BadPhoto wrote:
No, you are the one being irrational and inhumane about C***D. You clearly don't care who dies. I do. I think the people that should die are the ones that are acting irresponsibly; that is justice.
As to your second statement; so you think everyone has the same intelligence and worth? The first part is wrong on the face of it. The second means you assign no value to responsibility.
People that care get v******ted, wear masks, and keep their distance not just to avoid getting infected but also to avoid t***smitting the v***s. Lots of people have no symptoms; they can spread the disease if they don't act responsibly.
People that don't care just ignore mitigations, discount the death rates, and argue that life goes on. At least until they get critically ill and beg to be saved.
The worst sort are those that publicly argue against mitigation. They are true k**lers; their followers are risking sickness and death. That is the sort of person you are.
No, you are the one being irrational and inhumane ... (
show quote)
H**ers, that would be you and others who want justice, are completely irrational and unfair in their thinking. First of all it is not you who decides who gets to live and die. That is not up to anyone here on the planet. If you truly want justice then you would make the very same irrational statement about drunk drivers, you would insist on the death penalty for every person on the planet who causes the death of another, you would insist that people who do dangerous hobbies receive no health care if they die. Let's count in skydiving, race car drivers, motorists who speed on the highway. Drunk drivers don't mean to k**l a family of five and yet...many do. Speeders don't mean to run over little children in a school zone and yet...they do. So your justice then would be death for those people. That is just the same as you wanting death for those people who have not been v******ted.
But of course that thinking I suggested is irrational; you and yours will say. Nope, it is the same thinking as yours; those who put others at risk are not worth saving; is is acceptable that they die, to you and others here.
As for v***s patients begging for their lives, my mind cannot wrap around that happening. I guess yours can because you envision somebody, of course a Conservative, even though there is no proof that Liberals ALSO have not been v******ted. But you want those people to die. That makes you one irrational human being just as Rose said. You blame non v******ted people for not caring and yet...Now where did you put that mirror?
Dennis
dennis2146 wrote:
H**ers, that would be you and others who want justice, are completely irrational and unfair in their thinking. First of all it is not you who decides who gets to live and die. That is not up to anyone here on the planet. If you truly want justice then you would make the very same irrational statement about drunk drivers, you would insist on the death penalty for every person on the planet who causes the death of another, you would insist that people who do dangerous hobbies receive no health care if they die. Let's count in skydiving, race car drivers, motorists who speed on the highway. Drunk drivers don't mean to k**l a family of five and yet...many do. Speeders don't mean to run over little children in a school zone and yet...they do. So your justice then would be death for those people. That is just the same as you wanting death for those people who have not been v******ted.
But of course that thinking I suggested is irrational; you and yours will say. Nope, it is the same thinking as yours; those who put others at risk are not worth saving; is is acceptable that they die, to you and others here.
As for v***s patients begging for their lives, my mind cannot wrap around that happening. I guess yours can because you envision somebody, of course a Conservative, even though there is no proof that Liberals ALSO have not been v******ted. But you want those people to die. That makes you one irrational human being just as Rose said. You blame non v******ted people for not caring and yet...Now where did you put that mirror?
Dennis
H**ers, that would be you and others who want just... (
show quote)
To address your intended audience as “H**ers” with the first word of a rant. What a great way to make a point.
dennis2146 wrote:
H**ers, that would be you and others who want justice, are completely irrational and unfair in their thinking. First of all it is not you who decides who gets to live and die. That is not up to anyone here on the planet. If you truly want justice then you would make the very same irrational statement about drunk drivers, you would insist on the death penalty for every person on the planet who causes the death of another, you would insist that people who do dangerous hobbies receive no health care if they die. Let's count in skydiving, race car drivers, motorists who speed on the highway. Drunk drivers don't mean to k**l a family of five and yet...many do. Speeders don't mean to run over little children in a school zone and yet...they do. So your justice then would be death for those people. That is just the same as you wanting death for those people who have not been v******ted.
But of course that thinking I suggested is irrational; you and yours will say. Nope, it is the same thinking as yours; those who put others at risk are not worth saving; is is acceptable that they die, to you and others here.
As for v***s patients begging for their lives, my mind cannot wrap around that happening. I guess yours can because you envision somebody, of course a Conservative, even though there is no proof that Liberals ALSO have not been v******ted. But you want those people to die. That makes you one irrational human being just as Rose said. You blame non v******ted people for not caring and yet...Now where did you put that mirror?
Dennis
H**ers, that would be you and others who want just... (
show quote)
Your reasoning really sucks.
BadPhoto wrote:
No, you are the one being irrational and inhumane about C***D. You clearly don't care who dies. I do. I think the people that should die are the ones that are acting irresponsibly; that is justice.
As to your second statement; so you think everyone has the same intelligence and worth? The first part is wrong on the face of it. The second means you assign no value to responsibility.
People that care get v******ted, wear masks, and keep their distance not just to avoid getting infected but also to avoid t***smitting the v***s. Lots of people have no symptoms; they can spread the disease if they don't act responsibly.
People that don't care just ignore mitigations, discount the death rates, and argue that life goes on. At least until they get critically ill and beg to be saved.
The worst sort are those that publicly argue against mitigation. They are true k**lers; their followers are risking sickness and death. That is the sort of person you are.
No, you are the one being irrational and inhumane ... (
show quote)
So you’re ok with drunk drivers k*****g innocent families, and gays dying of AIDS, but you choose to condemn the people who don’t want this specific v*****e because you’re butt hurt and they won’t follow YOUR wishes? Got it. That says all I need to know about you and your maturity level. I bet you throw a mean temper tantrum when your mad too.
Kraken wrote:
How do you figure, it's black and white, no gray areas. They don't care about you or anyone else-period.
With a leader like that, I can see why you’re so frikken warped in your thought processes.
Kmgw9v wrote:
To address your intended audience as “H**ers” with the first word of a rant. What a great way to make a point.
Unfortunately it appears to have gone over your pointy head.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.