That's not what they call it, an enormous cemetery for a tiny town. On a hill, popular in the day because of cell phone coverage, at night with the younger set for amorous purposes. A pair of stitch Panos from a high point, and my loyal old Pickup in its element. D3 etc. as usual.
If you're going to include the Yeller Truck, then include the Yeller Truck. Would you want a picture of yourself --or some loved-one-- to be cut off at the knees?
(Still say you're on the cusp of startin' to post-process, but it might take a nudge or two.)
Cany143 wrote:
If you're going to include the Yeller Truck, then include the Yeller Truck. Would you want a portrait of yourself --or some loved-one-- to be cut off at the knees?
(Still say you're on the cusp of startin' to post-process, but it might take a nudge or two.)
Good point, but better the horses head than...
As to big time post, nah, can't see it. The stitch thing is just interesting at the moment.
quixdraw wrote:
Good point, but better the horses head than...
As to big time post, nah, can't see it. The stitch thing is just interesting at the moment.
Hmmm. I see you'd edited your post. Which is fine (I hope), 'cause so did I.
More to the point, though: without the horse's azz, its less than half a horse. Which some horses might take as being..... oh, nevermind.
The stitch thing is interesting, for sure, and it can certainly be enticing in the panoramic places we find around us. Having the long and skinny make some sort of statement (I REFUSE to use that poorly used term 'story' though, for more reasons than I can count), be it compositional or any of a myriad of other photographic cues, is an entirely other matter.
You know how to use a camera. You're right on with exposure. You're good with when (or when not) to use dof to the image's advantage (re: the other of your posts today, the one with the granary in the reflection of your rear view mirror and the field off to your view), so no complaint there. What --in my ever-so-humble-and steeeenkingly informed 'pinion-- you're victim to (apart from this unreasoning unwillingness you seem to have) is the difficulty you unerringly have with element placement and ultimately, with composition.
Yeah, I'll probably get banned for saying that, but wtf. So much around here (in UHHville) could be SO much better, in so many ways...... But if others can't, I figure you can handle it.
Cany143 wrote:
Hmmm. I see you'd edited your post. Which is fine (I hope), 'cause so did I.
More to the point, though: without the horse's azz, its less than half a horse. Which some horses might take as being..... oh, nevermind.
The stitch thing is interesting, for sure, and it can certainly be enticing in the panoramic places we find around us. Having the long and skinny make some sort of statement (I REFUSE to use that poorly used term 'story' though, for more reasons than I can count), be it compositional or any of a myriad of other photographic cues, is an entirely other matter.
You know how to use a camera. You're right on with exposure. You're good with when (or when not) to use dof to the image's advantage (re: the other of your posts today, the one with the granary in the reflection of your rear view mirror and the field off to your view), so no complaint there. What --in my ever-so-humble-and steeeenkingly informed 'pinion-- you're victim to (apart from this unreasoning unwillingness you seem to have) is the difficulty you unerringly have with element placement and ultimately, with composition.
Yeah, I'll probably get banned for saying that, but wtf. So much around here (in UHHville) could be SO much better, in so many ways...... But if others can't, I figure you can handle it.
Hmmm. I see you'd edited your post. Which is fin... (
show quote)
Man, can't imagine that anything in your post would get you banned. I certainly have no complaint over honest input, particularly from an expert photographer. Thing is, IMO, you are a specialist, and far better at your specialty than I will ever be. I am, and for around 60 years in photography, have been a generalist - I'll take a picture of a waterdrop rolling down a window pane, bugs, landscapes, you name it, dam' near anything that catches my eye, other than people down on their luck. I don't resent the technology, and I'm no kind of Luddite. At the bottom of it, for me, is that technology, cameras, computers, etc. can allow someone to close the gap between what I have learned the hard way down the decades, and what their magic camera or program can do now. Good on them, in one way, maybe they will go higher, farther, faster. I'm just going to plod along and have fun with my cameras using the skills I've accumulated. I'd be interested in having a back channel conversation on composition, though I don't feel it is a weak point for me, certainly not for you. Thank you, I appreciate your candor.
Certainly not my cup of tea. I got my first wide angle lens today. I'm going to have to change my style just to use it effectively
Tjohn
Loc: Inverness, FL formerly Arivaca, AZ
Nice country. Someday I hope to visit there.
Well done, beautiful & seamless.
Curmudgeon wrote:
Certainly not my cup of tea. I got my first wide angle lens today. I'm going to have to change my style just to use it effectively
Some days photos come easily other days not! The wide ones are fun, particularly in town or other close quarters.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.