Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.
RAW versus raw
Sep 5, 2021 08:30:02 #
Rick from NY wrote:
Is there a moderator who can stick a fork in this inane thread?
Yes, you are the moderator of what you choose to read and participate.
Recognize and implement your authority.
Sep 5, 2021 08:31:25 #
srt101fan wrote:
Question to the hog grammarians:
OK, RAW, in photography, is not an acronym. Got that. But are there any rules that say you can't have a word that's made up of all caps, like RAW, but is not an acronym? 🤔
OK, RAW, in photography, is not an acronym. Got that. But are there any rules that say you can't have a word that's made up of all caps, like RAW, but is not an acronym? 🤔
Well, not in a DOS file system. In Unix, the difference between RAW and raw is dramatic.
Sep 5, 2021 08:42:03 #
Rick from NY wrote:
Is there a moderator who can stick a fork in this inane thread?
Stop watching...
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.
Sep 5, 2021 09:03:50 #
BigDaddy wrote:
Yes, you are the moderator of what you choose to read and participate.
Recognize and implement your authority.
Recognize and implement your authority.
Yep... Chew, analyze, spit out or digest !
Sep 5, 2021 10:24:18 #
Longshadow wrote:
Raw is.
If one converts from RAW to JPEG without any changes, it's still "uncooked".
If one converts from RAW to JPEG without any changes, it's still "uncooked".
Not exactly. It *would* be cooked but very bland and not at all seasoned.
Some users PP efforts are really quite “gourmet”. Others are more like just pouring ketchup on everything :-(
Sep 5, 2021 10:35:21 #
CA_CanonUser wrote:
Sorry, but the raw photo taken by your camera is not an analog workflow. Your camera is storing a digital image made up of zeros and ones. Analog signals are continuous curves, frequently sine waves.
Very glad that someone really cares. Thank you for that.
A sensor processes an analog input into rasterized digital output. That is the Rasterized Analog Workflow (RAW).
Hopefully, there will be endless stoopid but entertaining argument over this.
Sep 5, 2021 10:45:03 #
User ID wrote:
...Some users PP efforts are really quite “gourmet”. Others are more like just pouring ketchup on everything :-(
I prefer it spiced up a bit so I prefer to pour Worcestershire sauce over everything.
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.
Sep 5, 2021 10:45:41 #
User ID wrote:
...Hopefully, there will be endless stoopid but entertaining argument over this.
A given. It's already page 13.
Sep 5, 2021 10:53:31 #
User ID wrote:
Very glad that someone really cares. Thank you for that.
A sensor processes an analog input into rasterized digital output. That is the Rasterized Analog Workflow (RAW).
Hopefully, there will be endless stoopid but entertaining argument over this.
A sensor processes an analog input into rasterized digital output. That is the Rasterized Analog Workflow (RAW).
Hopefully, there will be endless stoopid but entertaining argument over this.
I have to ask if you are the one responsible for applying this definition to the RAW photo "acronym"?
We can keep an eye out for a web page somewhere on the internet picking it up, to be cut and pasted and blasted on every photo website on the planet so it will soon be common knowledge. Hoggers paying attention will know exactly to whom to give credit. Hopefully you can handle all the fame coming your way😉👍🤷♀️👀👌✔💕
Sep 5, 2021 10:59:03 #
lmTrying wrote:
I've been here for 5 years. I started messing with... (show quote)
Very nice response!
----
Sep 5, 2021 11:01:13 #
User ID wrote:
Not exactly. It *would* be cooked but very bland and not at all seasoned.
Some users PP efforts are really quite “gourmet”. Others are more like just pouring ketchup on everything :-(
Some users PP efforts are really quite “gourmet”. Others are more like just pouring ketchup on everything :-(
Or steak sauce???
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
Sep 5, 2021 11:02:57 #
DirtFarmer wrote:
I prefer it spiced up a bit so I prefer to pour Worcestershire sauce over everything.
I will pour anything and everything over everything and anything ! It’s the art of gastronomic post processing :-)
Sep 5, 2021 11:13:09 #
User ID wrote:
I will pour anything and everything over everything and anything ! It’s the art of gastronomic post processing :-)
Wow, I never use steak sauce on a steak.
If I want to taste steak sauce, I'll put it on crackers.
Tried it on steak once. Only tasted the sauce.
Expensive way to eat the sauce.
Sep 5, 2021 11:15:06 #
Longshadow wrote:
Wow, I never use steak sauce on a steak.
If I want to taste steak sauce, I'll put it on crackers.
Tried it on steak once. Only tasted the sauce.
Expensive way to eat the sauce.
If I want to taste steak sauce, I'll put it on crackers.
Tried it on steak once. Only tasted the sauce.
Expensive way to eat the sauce.
I don't use it on steak either. Hamburger sometimes. But it's really good on french fries.
Sep 5, 2021 11:19:55 #
BigDaddy wrote:
I have to ask if you are the one responsible for applying this definition to the RAW photo "acronym"?
We can keep an eye out for a web page somewhere on the internet picking it up, to be cut and pasted and blasted on every photo website on the planet so it will soon be common knowledge. Hoggers paying attention will know exactly to whom to give credit. Hopefully you can handle all the fame coming your way😉👍🤷♀️👀👌✔💕
We can keep an eye out for a web page somewhere on the internet picking it up, to be cut and pasted and blasted on every photo website on the planet so it will soon be common knowledge. Hoggers paying attention will know exactly to whom to give credit. Hopefully you can handle all the fame coming your way😉👍🤷♀️👀👌✔💕
This being a photo phorum, I will reply with an appropriate image, presumably saving 1000 words .....
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Street Photography section of our forum.