Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
An Interesting Point Regarding Amateur vs. Accomplished Photographers
Page 1 of 17 next> last>>
Jun 29, 2021 13:42:14   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
I was watching an interview with Daniel Milnor. He's a documentary photographer. One of the statements he made was in regard to the successful high-end photographers is their lack of being obsessed with equipment. It appears that amateurs are the equipment-obsessed group. The successful photographers will discuss techniques, aspects of projects in which they are currently engaged, etc. Equipment is not a primary concern.

That makes a great deal of sense in that working with equipment that one has had for a considerable length of time provides the comfort of familiarity. That allows one to concentrate on the project at hand.
--Bob

Reply
Jun 29, 2021 13:44:17   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 

Reply
Jun 29, 2021 13:54:29   #
L-Fox
 
rmalarz wrote:
I was watching an interview with Daniel Milnor. He's a documentary photographer. One of the statements he made was in regard to the successful high-end photographers is their lack of being obsessed with equipment. It appears that amateurs are the equipment-obsessed group. The successful photographers will discuss techniques, aspects of projects in which they are currently engaged, etc. Equipment is not a primary concern.

That makes a great deal of sense in that working with equipment that one has had for a considerable length of time provides the comfort of familiarity. That allows one to concentrate on the project at hand.
--Bob
I was watching an interview with Daniel Milnor. He... (show quote)


Makes sense to me...

Reply
 
 
Jun 29, 2021 13:55:42   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
If they gave Pulitzers for the equipment, we'd all be winners.

Reply
Jun 29, 2021 13:57:08   #
fetzler Loc: North West PA
 
rmalarz wrote:
I was watching an interview with Daniel Milnor. He's a documentary photographer. One of the statements he made was in regard to the successful high-end photographers is their lack of being obsessed with equipment. It appears that amateurs are the equipment-obsessed group. The successful photographers will discuss techniques, aspects of projects in which they are currently engaged, etc. Equipment is not a primary concern.

That makes a great deal of sense in that working with equipment that one has had for a considerable length of time provides the comfort of familiarity. That allows one to concentrate on the project at hand.
--Bob
I was watching an interview with Daniel Milnor. He... (show quote)


That's right vision and creativity is the most important element of photography. One does need, however, the right equipment for the task at hand which may narrow the selection of cameras and lenses.

Professional photographers are photographers who get paid for their photography.

Amateur photographers pursue photography for non-pecuniary interests.

Neither classification suggests a level of accomplishment.

Reply
Jun 29, 2021 13:57:18   #
Quixdraw Loc: x
 
Just tools. As long as you have what you need to perform the tasks that you require, you're good. Pros are sometimes practicing in a limited range of genres, consequently may not need a macro, or long tele, etc.

Reply
Jun 29, 2021 14:01:19   #
Reuss Griffiths Loc: Ravenna, Ohio
 
I don't think Van Gogh, Picasso and Renoir had better brushes.

Reply
 
 
Jun 29, 2021 14:05:03   #
tradio Loc: Oxford, Ohio
 
I would think that a high-end photographer would already have an arsenal of glass and accessories therefor, he can devote his thoughts and discussions on techniques-
That's the argument I make with the better half anyway...

Reply
Jun 29, 2021 14:10:19   #
PhotogHobbyist Loc: Bradford, PA
 
rmalarz wrote:
I was watching an interview with Daniel Milnor. He's a documentary photographer. One of the statements he made was in regard to the successful high-end photographers is their lack of being obsessed with equipment. It appears that amateurs are the equipment-obsessed group. The successful photographers will discuss techniques, aspects of projects in which they are currently engaged, etc. Equipment is not a primary concern.

That makes a great deal of sense in that working with equipment that one has had for a considerable length of time provides the comfort of familiarity. That allows one to concentrate on the project at hand.
--Bob
I was watching an interview with Daniel Milnor. He... (show quote)


A very succinct way to express the truth about photography. Knowledge is priceless.

Reply
Jun 29, 2021 14:32:23   #
texasdigital Loc: Conroe, Texas
 
True, but most professional photographers I'm familiar with, already shoot with advanced equipment. For example, prior to digital, most studio/wedding photographers used Hasselblad. That being said, I once knew a studio photographer who produced very decent work, and he shot on a Canon AE1.

Reply
Jun 29, 2021 14:40:03   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
In all actuality, the post referred to accomplished photographers. This does not necessarily embody solely professionals.

The person in the interview referred to cameras he's used for years.
--Bob

Reply
 
 
Jun 29, 2021 14:41:23   #
User ID
 
rmalarz wrote:
I was watching an interview with Daniel Milnor. He's a documentary photographer. One of the statements he made was in regard to the successful high-end photographers is their lack of being obsessed with equipment. It appears that amateurs are the equipment-obsessed group. The successful photographers will discuss techniques, aspects of projects in which they are currently engaged, etc. Equipment is not a primary concern.

That makes a great deal of sense in that working with equipment that one has had for a considerable length of time provides the comfort of familiarity. That allows one to concentrate on the project at hand.
--Bob
I was watching an interview with Daniel Milnor. He... (show quote)

TYCO

Reply
Jun 29, 2021 14:42:15   #
User ID
 
Reuss Griffiths wrote:
I don't think Van Gogh, Picasso and Renoir had better brushes.

Acoarst they did.

Reply
Jun 29, 2021 14:46:15   #
texasdigital Loc: Conroe, Texas
 
rmalarz wrote:
In all actuality, the post referred to accomplished photographers. This does not necessarily embody solely professionals.

The person in the interview referred to cameras he's used for years.
--Bob


So it does. I suppose I was sidetracked by his comment about successful high-end photographers, which I interpreted to mean professionals.

Reply
Jun 29, 2021 14:49:45   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
I had a desk accessory for a long time with this quote:

Great minds discuss ideas.
Average minds discuss events.
Small minds discuss people.

I know several accomplished artists. They all focus on their process more than on their equipment. None of them use cheap, crummy brushes. I doubt that van Gough or any other accomplished artist did (or does) either. And I've written elsewhere about my friend who was very proud to have found the really good watercolor paints, with less binder and more pigment. She told me about them at length after receiving the first set of them a year of so ago. But now they are part of her process. She has not mentioned them for months.

Reply
Page 1 of 17 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.