Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Film vs Digital.... again
Oct 13, 2012 14:40:51   #
OddJobber Loc: Portland, OR
 
OK, now that there are plenty of high quality 35mm film cameras available at low prices, advice please?

Quote from Ken Rockwell review 10 years ago: "If you want digital, it's easy! I buy print film at Costco for $1 a roll (Fuji 400 with a coupon) and have it developed with 5x7" prints and the images burns as JPGs on a CD for about $9 a roll. You can shoot this way for years, not pay as much as you would for a digital camera, and have the files on gold archival CD, prints, negatives, and presuming you copy the files to your computer, your computer, too! "

Googling film processing indicates that Costco's new film processors print at only 6 MP resolution, anyone know what the resolution is for the JPEG's on CD?

Just because I like posts with pictures.
Just because I like posts with pictures....

Reply
Oct 13, 2012 15:21:34   #
EstherP
 
I checked a few images on my HD:
2976 x 3968 pixels, 3.32mb, will print at 10 x 13 inches.
2356 x 1182 pixels, 438kb, will print at 8 x 4 inches.
I've calculated print resolutions at 300 ppi.

If the 5 x 7 inch images on the CD are around 1500 x 2100 pixels, you should have no problem getting them printed at good resolution.

If the disks have not been looked at for a long time, I would also suggest you put them into the disk drive, and see if they are still readable. If so, copy them to either an external hard drive or to DVD's - the CD's won't last much longer, not so much because of the CD's themselves, but because the technology is changing.
I can read CD's only in my 10-year old laptop. Win7 on the new laptop or the less-than-two-year-old desktop gives me an errormessage that their are incompatible....
EstherP

Reply
Oct 13, 2012 16:32:54   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
Digital has come a LONGGGG way in the 10 years since Rockwell voiced that opinion. 2.47MP D1's were still extremely popular amongst Pros at that time.

Reply
 
 
Oct 13, 2012 17:06:49   #
FilmFanatic Loc: Waikato, New Zealand
 
MT Shooter wrote:
Digital has come a LONGGGG way in the 10 years since Rockwell voiced that opinion. 2.47MP D1's were still extremely popular amongst Pros at that time.


And minilab scans of film are sh*t

KR is the eternal optimist sometimes

Reply
Oct 13, 2012 17:37:42   #
OddJobber Loc: Portland, OR
 
Esther: I also have some old CD's of pics, except my laptop is even ruder...it says I don't have a CD installed. :thumbdown:

MT: Yup. About that time, I got my first digital with about 1 MP for only $500. :shock:

FilmFanatic: Don't be afraid to express an opinion. Are you saying that's bad? :-D :-D

On well, maybe more research before I take a step back. Meantime, for those who don't really care about high resolution, here's a 1 pixel foto. :|

Low reslution
Low reslution...

Reply
Oct 13, 2012 17:45:27   #
FilmFanatic Loc: Waikato, New Zealand
 
OddJobber wrote:
Esther: I also have some old CD's of pics, except my laptop is even ruder...it says I don't have a CD installed. :thumbdown:

MT: Yup. About that time, I got my first digital with about 1 MP for only $500. :shock:

FilmFanatic: Don't be afraid to express an opinion. Are you saying that's bad? :-D :-D

On well, maybe more research before I take a step back. Meantime, for those who don't really care about high resolution, here's a 1 pixel foto. :|


I do tend to beat around the bush, don't I... :)

Reply
Oct 14, 2012 06:04:24   #
bull drink water Loc: pontiac mi.
 
for now digital,i got courious and got the bug.if i was still doing film,i would be only doing slides. i would have my screen and projector out and my computer off.it would be a little harder to share my photos with you and everything would be manual focus. oh yeah,i'd be about $14,000.00 richer.

Reply
 
 
Oct 14, 2012 06:56:51   #
stingray
 
ive got a canon 600d BUT i also use minolta 7000i film camera i love the minolta regards stingray

Reply
Oct 14, 2012 10:28:58   #
OddJobber Loc: Portland, OR
 
That's what I'm talking about, stingray. You wouldn't sell your Minolta on ebay for $40, same reason I still have a Nikon F.

Bull, that's another option I'm considering. I like slides and I have a 14 megapixel slide scanner.....

Reply
Oct 14, 2012 18:37:31   #
Photogdog Loc: New Kensington, PA
 
OddJobber wrote:
That's what I'm talking about, stingray. You wouldn't sell your Minolta on ebay for $40, same reason I still have a Nikon F.

Bull, that's another option I'm considering. I like slides and I have a 14 megapixel slide scanner.....


I just wonder how much longer film and the chemicals will be around to expose and process prints and slides.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.