Bridges wrote:
Before retiring, I worked at one of the most prestigious Country Clubs in the world. The general manager was always dressed like a model for a high end men's shop. His trousers were perfect with a very crisp crease, his shirts looked like they were just delivered from the cleaners, his sports coats were just as fashionable. He wore fine leather loafers that looked as much like house slippers as shoes. No sox! He never wore sox. This was an interesting quirk and would be mentioned by patrons and employees from time to time. When he retired and a wheelbarrow of gifts were rolled out. Someone presented him with a gift to be opened at the podium. Yep, a great looking pair of Argyle Sox! As funny as that seems, think about this: I have a pair of Sperry Gold Cup shoes that are lined with the softest most wonderful feeling deer skin leather. These are not expensive shoes -- something between 150 - 200 dollars. This is cheap in comparison to a pair of fine Italian leather shoes that run hundreds, maybe over a thousand for the best. Now, why buy all that luxury and then put a 6.50 piece of cloth between your feet and that wonderful leather! This could be the same as putting a 10.00 filter on a 2000.00 lens, or paying 800.00 for a high end receiver and hooking up a pair of 40.00 speakers to it. Around the house I have been going sox-less when wearing house shoes or boat shoes. I still sox-up when going out in public though.
Before retiring, I worked at one of the most prest... (
show quote)
So what would you wear under an Armani suit?
In San Antonio, men young and old have a uniform that says I come from a money/power family, short sleeve sports shirt, baggy trousers with out pleats no socks and a pair of vary worn unpolished brown penny loafers. It will get you in at any location, day or night and is the correct dress for going to the bank, and at the bank (everyone prefers Frost Bank), that a vice president or one of the bank presidents will serve you. It says that your family has money, loads of it.
ad9mac wrote:
That seems to be a Southern tradition (I'm in NC btw)
Slacks, dress shirts, loafers, sans sox.
Not for me.
OK casual with boat shoes.
I first noticed the trend in 1965. Bass Weejuns and Sportocasins were very popular in Louisville. Guys were starting to wear them sockless in the spring of that year. At UofL, it was very trendy, and Louisville wasn't known for trend-setting. The city was very "button down" as far as dress went. But by 1968, folks were taking Weejuns and making sandals from them.
Before low-quarter Chuck Taylors were available, guys would cut the tops off, and then go sockless; that started around 1966.
Ahhh, memories!
TriX wrote:
Yep, it has been a “southern thing” for at least 50 years, and I never wear socks with deck shoes. I’ve noticed on recent episodes of “Million Dolllar Listing - Los Angeles” that going sockless, even with suits, seems to have migrated to the west coast as well.
Right. Even on the east coast - no socks with deck shoes. That's probably because if you get your feet wet, the socks will take too long to dry. (Just kidding)
SteveR wrote:
Anything else?
They're called "unmentionables" for a reason.
I complained when I had no shoes until I met a man with no feet.
Sox?--socks? Oh, no, I wore gaitors!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.