"Doctor" Donald Trump (Page 2): :sm24: :sm24: That's one way to put it. I prefer the straight forward lying A-hole.

scooter1 Loc: Yacolt, Wa.

Nalle wrote:

It is now unanimous, and I have been proven right ... (show quote)

That's one way to put it. I prefer the straight forward lying A-hole.

scooter1 Loc: Yacolt, Wa.

Nalle wrote:

Wrong!
https://www.c***d19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antiv***l-therapy/chloroquine-or-hydroxychloroquine-with-or-without-azithromycin/

That was dated10/9/20. I've seen the same news that ID guy mentioned.

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

Nalle wrote:

It is now unanimous, and I have been proven right ... (show quote)

Also F***i said masks were worthless then when the President did not wear one demanded the sheep in this nation all be mandated to wear a mask and now 2-3 masks.
Democrats all believe this i***t still.

dlwhawaii Loc: Sunny Wailuku, Hawaii

Architect1776 wrote:

Also F***i said masks were worthless then when the... (show quote)

More than we believe you.

InfiniteISO Loc: The Carolinas, USA

This is the study that has people changing their minds about Hydroxychloroquine. The article is from two weeks ago.

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210602/HydroxychloroquineAzithromycin-therapy-at-a-higher-dose-improved-survival-by-nearly-20025-in-ventilated-C***D-patients.aspx

Triple G

InfiniteISO wrote:

This is the study that has people changing their minds about Hydroxychloroquine. The article is from two weeks ago.

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210602/HydroxychloroquineAzithromycin-therapy-at-a-higher-dose-improved-survival-by-nearly-20025-in-ventilated-C***D-patients.aspx

I don’t see where it will be changing much in the scientific community.

Important Notice
medRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.

The conclusion that the compounded drug needed to be adjusted for patient weight is hardly sugnificant.

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

Triple G wrote:

I don’t see where it will be changing much in the scientific community.

Important Notice
medRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.

The conclusion that the compounded drug needed to be adjusted for patient weight is hardly sugnificant.

As we have seen this past over a year that so called science is clueless and totally political changing their i***t story about the "Facts" at least once a week.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

My, my, the politicization of science.... It's a lefty thing and it really sucks.

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

Blurryeyed wrote:

My, my, the politicization of science.... It's a lefty thing and it really sucks.

Those scientists have to do as told or funding goes away.
Sad that is the case and prevents the t***h from coming out, rather we get pseudo science that follows the democrat talking points and agenda including so called c*****e c****e.

dlwhawaii Loc: Sunny Wailuku, Hawaii

Architect1776 wrote:

As we have seen this past over a year that so called science is clueless and totally political changing their i***t story about the "Facts" at least once a week.

More "pearls of wisdom" from Archie.

Triple G

Blurryeyed wrote:

My, my, the politicization of science.... It's a lefty thing and it really sucks.

Republicans using Fox News are not innocent bystanders.

https://rdi.org/democracy-examined/2020/9/24/the-politicization-of-science-is-a-novel-uniquely-american-issue-why/

https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/regulation/2007/3/v30n1-inreview.pdf#page=1

https://www.nupoliticalreview.com/2020/11/07/the-politicization-of-science-is-going-to-k**l-us/

scooter1 Loc: Yacolt, Wa.

dlwhawaii wrote:

More "pearls of wisdom" from Archie.

And little Hawaii adds his non fact nasty reply. Try for once to say something intelligent. Maybe that ship's sailed. Prove me wrong.

dlwhawaii Loc: Sunny Wailuku, Hawaii

scooter1 wrote:

And little Hawaii adds his non fact nasty reply. Try for once to say something intelligent. Maybe that ship's sailed. Prove me wrong.

Scoot adds his non fact nasty reply.

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

FRENCHY wrote:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jul/3/pe... (show quote)

A flawed study:

The study that sparked the latest controversy was anything but randomized. Not only was it not randomized, outside experts noted, but patients who received hydroxychloroquine were also more likely to get steroids, which appear to help very sick patients with C****-**. That is likely to have influenced the central finding of the Henry Ford study: that death rates were 50% lower among patients in hospitals treated with hydroxychloroquine.

https://www.statnews.com/2020/07/08/a-flawed-c****-**-study-gets-the-white-houses-attention-and-the-fda-may-pay-the-price/

scooter1 Loc: Yacolt, Wa.

dlwhawaii wrote:

Scoot adds his non fact nasty reply.

Architect made a statement of his thoughts on science. Your statement attacked him sarcastically with no facts. I called you out for not trying to argue his point but only attacking him. That was fact. Then again you make a nasty reply with no fact except to belittle my statement of fact about your attack. I rest my case.