How was that an insult? You said the left was over the cliff (without specifics, BTW) and I am just reminding you that you should not be lecturing anyone as over the cliff while you ignore the sacking of out Capitol. Maybe they do or don't represent Trump Town, but I have yet to see you condemn them. In fact, what I have seen from you is a rationalization of the behavior and if not rationalizing, certainly diminishing the importance of 1*6. And quite unlike you and the Capitol r**t I have sever sought to rationalize, justify or diminish the civil unrest of last summer.

And given your penchant for the sweeping generalization, you of all people here do not need to be lecturing me on the subject.

Tend to agree. Biden poses as the anti-Trump. He cements his pose by reversing border controls via Executive Orders he signs while smirking.

He bungled his attempt to deflect criticism about his failed border action by appointing his sidekick Kamal to manage the border invasion. But she has no experience in immigration matters. As well, she has steadfastly refused to visit the border because going their could hurt her political future (i.e. running for President).

He has sent her to Mexico and Central America to learn the root causes of illegal migration therefrom. She has no experience in international relations. Besides, interviews with i*****l m*****ts indicate they illegally migrate to the the U.S. for their economic betterment.

News reports say Biden intends to flood Central American nations with U.S. taxpayer dollars to improve conditions therein. Expect a boondoggle because of the endemic corruption in those nations. The corrupt elites there will line their own pockets with this dollar infusion. So far, Biden has not described the controls over these dollars ensuring they go 100 percent to improved economic conditions in the target nations.

Critics may jump on this foreign policy because it smacks of nation building. In fact, these nations function according to custom and tradition going back to their inception. Their cultural values guide them and their politics. The gringo does not know how to reorganize these nations to suit the his desires for them. The leadership in these nations will smile and glad-hand Kamal in hopes of diverting U.S. dollars to their own benefit.

Right again on all points.

We cannot improve living conditions in Central America; nation building is just another term for graft and corruption (consider our experience in Afghanistan - Karzai duped the US on all fronts and pocketed millions.)

A better, more practical solution would be to set "immigration stations" in the affected countries. There the applicant could make their case and be approved or rejected FOR CONSIDERATION ONLY without making the perilous journey in vain. It would be a far less expensive and more humane way of addressing the problem.

One way to tighten control is if you apply, you get fingerprinted before any determination is made. Then those fingerprints along with the decision (either way) is entered into an immigration database. If you show up at the border and don't match the fingerprints, you are outright rejected. If you have been approved locally THEN you can make your case to the immigration judge at the border. The local immigration "decision makers" would have to be frequently rotated to improve the chance that our own people won't corrupt the system.