JRM993 wrote:
Film camera user looking to purchase first digital SLR camera
but
where to start
(also new to Hedgehog)
first of all...a lot of the information is dated...
so looking for advice in the here and now
mirrorless???
full frame???
dx vs fx???
should I look for a camera that would accept my previous lens...have several???
let's limit this to NIKON
as I am a loyal NIKON fan
Thank you for your input.
First question... DX or FX: Depends upon what you shoot and how big, heavy gear you're willing to carry. DX or crop sensor cameras tend to be a bit smaller, lighter and less expensive. They also allow you to get "more reach" with telephotos, while at the same time making wide angle lenses act "less wide". So if you shoot sports/action/wildlife with telephotos a lot, you might want DX. But if you shoot landscape, architecture, portraits, macro/close-ups a lot, you may prefer FX. Of course, either format can serve in any of those situations... so it's more a matter of one format offering some advantages over the other, depending upon what you're shooting.
You didn't specify what you're previous lenses are, but generally speaking older F-mount lenses can be used on modern cameras... both DSLRs and mirrorless. To use them on mirrorless you will need an adapter. It is important
exactly what lenses you have. Really old (pre-AI) Nikkors can be problematic. Earlier AF lenses also are only able to autofocus on certain camera bodies (D7500 and D500, among the DX cameras, for example). If you shop used gear,
older DSLR bodies are not fully compatible with the most recent AF-P lenses. AF-S lenses are the most widely compatible with the DSLRs and adaptable for use on the mirrorless Z-series.
There are lens/camera compatibility charts at the Nikon USA website, at Ken Rockwell's website and at the Nikonians.org website. You should check out your specific lenses there. (Third party lenses are another matter entirely, if that's what you have. They may or may not work... you'll have to do more research.)
DSLR or mirrorless? They both have their advantages. Mirrorless are the "latest and greatest", which means they're out of stock more often and their prices tend to be higher. A key feature of mirrorless is that they use an electronic viewfinder (EVF).... this is both a plus and a minus. The EVF is essentially a small screen that displays exactly what the image sensor in the camera is "seeing" through the lens. It can be set up so that it gives "exposure preview" that's reasonably accurate, can brighten up the scene in low light conditions and allows fast on-the-fly exposure tweaks while keeping your eye to the viewfinder. But EVFs also draw a lot of power, so you typically get a lot fewer shots than with a DSLR. There also can be problems with "blackout" that occurs in some EVFs, particularly when firing bursts of shots. Of course the same thing occurs in DSLRs, but the higher frame rate many mirrorless can shoot tends to make the blackout more problematic. Depending upon the manufacturer, there may be ways of reducing blackout... some have gone to continuing to display the last view on the EVF, while the image is being recorded.
Optical viewfinders in DSLRs are much like you're accustomed to using film SLRs. However, if yours are older SLRs designed for use with manual focus lenses, you will notice some things missing from modern DSLRs. Their viewfinders tend to be a bit smaller and don't have manual focus assist features like a matte screen, split image rangefinder or micro-diaprisms. This can make it a bit challenging to use older manual focus lenses on modern camera. However, in some models there are modern focus assist features, plus you can use Live View on the rear screen and even magnify the preview to help with critical focus... this can be done in many mirrorless cameras' EVFs, too.
Going forward, mirrorless will continue to improve and supplantDSLRs. It's now about 50/50... But that's happened in just 8 or 9 years. DSLRs really aren't that "old school", have only been around in common use since around 2000. (Yes, there were a few prior to that... but they were quite expensive, low resolution and really not in wide use by the general public.)
In spite of the phasing out of DSLRs that's bound to occur, DSLRs will be fully usable for many years to come, I'm sure. Particularly major brands like Nikon will be repairable and serviceable (if ever needed) for at least the next ten years or so, I'd wager. You can likely get more for your money, buying a DSLR... and it will feel most familiar to you, having used film SLRs.
Another mirrorless advantage is that some can shoot silently or very nearly so (AF and image stabilization may make some slight noises). This is done with an electronic shutter, rather than a physical one. There is a problem, though, called "rolling shutter effect" that occurs when making shots of moving subjects with an electronic shutter, so most (all?) mirrorless also have a mechanical shutter that isn't completely silent (and usually can't fire at the the same burst rate as an electronic shutter.)