If the v*****es "work" v******ted people should feel safe kissing the expectorate of C***d patients, and as so amply noted for masking, the second purpose of v******tion is to assure that no one can contribute to asymptomatic spread. Then there are those who are being told by our physicians to NOT get the v*****e, particularly any made with RNA. Don't even get me going on the potential for RNA v*****es to deliver more code than advertised.

For me, I still test positive for a high quantity of the C***d antibodies, and my primary suggests that there is simply no benefit and a greatly elevated risk of complications if I introduce the activity of the v*****e into what is most likely and already-immune body. Then there is the simple t***h that neither my primary nor myself trust the government in general, and particularly distrust a government pushing v*****es that are enriching the supposedly evil big pharma conglomerates.

For my wife, she is being advised to avoid v******tion for the reasons I have been, but also because she has been battling a condition currently diagnosed as "cyclic vomiting syndrome" for over a year, and the condition, for her at least, seems to be triggered by almost any random form of systemic stress. The pattern is stress , stomach tightness, more stress, more pain more stress, etc, followed by uncontrolled vomiting that leads to an ER visit. 17 trips, two surgeries and 5 other hospital admissions since March 2020, though none in the last 8 weeks. Her doctors, including primary and several specialists, have advised her that, having already had and recovered from C***d, there exists far greater opportunity for triggering her vomiting condition with a v*****e than with another C***d bout, which, oddly, did not trigger a vomiting episode.

Now, adding to the facts that both of us had and beat C***d, still possess antibodies, are being told by medical professionals to NOT v******te at this time, big pharma and many of the most vocal have a monetary interest in the v*****e, and the v******ted receive exactly no benefit in the form of eased restrictions, I have to suggest that there IS a question as to why rational people, especially young and/or healthy folks would v******te.

And FYI, Bill Gates, in his TED talk from 2010, actually said 'v*****es' and 'population reduction' in the same sentence. I think I believe him. https://youtu.be/JaF-fq2Zn7I?t=272

Here is my last word on this thread. According to CDC numbers. the mortality rate from c***d is less than 2%. And the rate for those under 65 the rate is less than 1%. And for those over 85 less than 5%. So, the disease is most dangerous for those over 65. So for the vast number of Americans the c***d mortality rate was close to the seasonal flu. And for that group the lockdowns, masking and any restriction was much more destructive than c***d, and the :cure was worse than the disease. For those over 65, every precaution was necessary. Self quarantine, age ID or anything else. The record setting v*****e development and it's distribution was required and those over 65 should come first, as well as those with co-mortalities of any age. Examples of how the v***s should have been handled are Fla and Tx. Either have had very few restrictions with little, if any. negative results.Yes C***d ** has been a very serious problem, but it was met with a very serioius overeaction. And anyone over 65 who does not get v******ted is courting a disaster.

Here is my last word on this thread. According to CDC numbers. the mortality rate from c***d is less than 2%. And the rate for those under 65 the rate is less than 1%. And for those over 85 less than 5%. So, the disease is most dangerous for those over 65. So for the vast number of Americans the c***d mortality rate was close to the seasonal flu. And for that group the lockdowns, masking and any restriction was much more destructive than c***d, and the :cure was worse than the disease. For those over 65, every precaution was necessary. Self quarantine, age ID or anything else. The record setting v*****e development and it's distribution was required and those over 65 should come first, as well as those with co-mortalities of any age. Examples of how the v***s should have been handled are Fla and Tx. Either have had very few restrictions with little, if any. negative results.Yes C***d ** has been a very serious problem, but it was met with a very serioius overeaction. And anyone over 65 who does not get v******ted is courting a disaster.