Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
The Evil I’s
Apr 28, 2021 10:48:44 #
Rab-Eye wrote:
Because these issues are frequently part of the comments posted in this section, I thought it would be OK to post something without a photo, but a question. Of the two evil I’s, which ruins a photo for you more? Ink or implants?
Neither of those bother me. I don't particularly like photos of women that are not photogenic. You have to admit, there are photos posted here that are very good, and quite a few that are simply awful. I don't say anything about the awful photos, I simply move on. I wish I wasn't in so much pain since breaking my wrist or I'd have more to say on this subject. It's killing me just to type out these few words.
Apr 28, 2021 11:01:59 #
2nefoto wrote:
Unless I've interpreted incorrectly, this, primarily, is a discourse on what a woman should or should not do to her body. I wonder if this implies a woman's choices for her body shouldn't be respected. My position is not to say choices may not be liked. The general opinion, here, appears that woman who do not kowtow to expected "norms" do not qualify as acceptable photography subjects.
You may be right.
Photographers know when women destroy their natural photogenic qualities by doing these things. And they are also sad and chagrinned to what they do to their personal bodies.
Apr 28, 2021 11:06:44 #
"...ink..implants negate woman's femininity... not as g_d intended"
Goes beyond photography I think.
Goes beyond photography I think.
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Apr 28, 2021 11:19:16 #
Just about any opinion here extends past photography. Personally, I'm not fond of either tats or fake tits. Thus, I'd not want to be involved, photographically or personally, with someone who had either, or both.
--Bob
--Bob
2nefoto wrote:
"...ink..implants negate woman's femininity... not as g_d intended"
Goes beyond photography I think.
Goes beyond photography I think.
Apr 28, 2021 11:22:16 #
I don't care what they do to themselves personally but if they destroy their natural photogenic beauty that is an issue photographically like it or not.
Apr 28, 2021 11:24:58 #
Apr 28, 2021 12:57:43 #
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
Apr 28, 2021 13:45:16 #
bertloomis
Loc: Fort Worth, Texas
Neither of these ruin it for me! A good photo of a pretty model is a wonderful thing! Ink or implants notwithstanding.
Apr 28, 2021 13:46:40 #
bertloomis
Loc: Fort Worth, Texas
Rab-Eye wrote:
Because these issues are frequently part of the comments posted in this section, I thought it would be OK to post something without a photo, but a question. Of the two evil I’s, which ruins a photo for you more? Ink or implants?
I always say that nice fake ones are better than lousy real ones.
Apr 28, 2021 13:46:50 #
rmalarz wrote:
Apparently, you have interpreted incorrectly. The thread has nothing to do with what a woman should or shouldn't do with her body. It's a matter of what people like seeing as a result of what she does with her body. in this thread, the results presented in a photograph.
--Bob
--Bob
Exactly.
Apr 28, 2021 14:08:17 #
Rab-Eye wrote:
Because these issues are frequently part of the comments I can see no way posted in this section, I thought it would be OK to post something without a photo, but a question. Of the two evil I’s, which ruins a photo for you more? Ink or implants?
Ink. I can see no way any Tat can improve the natural looks of an attractive female. As for implants, some are almost impossible to detect if not overdone, and can definitely improve the appearance of a woman who may have a small bust. But ink is a definite negative for me.
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Apr 28, 2021 14:09:36 #
Apr 28, 2021 14:19:05 #
Timmers
Loc: San Antonio Texas.
Fur is my turn off.
Why would a person shave their legs and have an unkempt bush or fur under the arms?
Why would a person shave their legs and have an unkempt bush or fur under the arms?
Apr 28, 2021 15:40:26 #
That was something I noticed during my time in Germany. That shaving thing wasn't popular with too many ladies there. There is something about the natural look that is quite nice.
--Bob
--Bob
Timmers wrote:
Fur is my turn off.
Why would a person shave their legs and have an unkempt bush or fur under the arms?
Why would a person shave their legs and have an unkempt bush or fur under the arms?
Apr 28, 2021 16:16:13 #
Ink…that’s never a good look. Implants properly done are certainly fine no if well done nobody can tell because they look natural. Some women want bigger boobs and I’m fine with that…but the ones that look like somebody put a balloon in there aren’t appealing because they don’t look right.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out People Photography section of our forum.