Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Milky Way & Superstition Mountain
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Apr 15, 2021 06:23:58   #
SkyKing Loc: Thompson Ridge, NY
 
...excellent work...!

Reply
Apr 15, 2021 06:50:00   #
J-SPEIGHT Loc: Akron, Ohio
 
Wilderness Images wrote:
I've always been intrigued by photographing the night stars, so for the last few months, I've been reading up on Star Trails and Milky Way photography and finally got to the point where I had to either do it or forget it. I'll admit that I don't have the ideal lens that the U-tubers are recommending, but I just used my 18-55mm kit lens on my Canon M6 Mark ll mirrorless with a 1.6 crop factor.

On Monday morning (04-12-21) I woke up around 01:30am, threw my gear in the truck and headed out to a deserted First Water Road which runs parallel to Superstition Mountain. My Photo Pills app had indicated that the Milky Way would be right above the mountain at around 03:00, and I was just hoping that the near 5,000ft ridgeline wouldn't be blocking it out.

I drove to one of my favorite parking spots, set up the camera/tripod and checked "Pills" again. Pills showed the Milky Way as being above the mountain with a slight incline to the East, which would put it in-line with the top ridge. I took a series of 'test shots' to see if the camera was pointed right and, after a few adjustments, took a 5-shot sequence. I did the same at five different locations to see which one would provide the best results, then called it a morning at 04:30am and went home to see what the computer would show me.

I used Sequator photo stacking software for the first time, while watching a U-tuber demonstrate its abilities and came out with a final image that I could take to the next step. I loaded the .tiff image into Affinity Photo and made some adjustments to enhance the Milky Way and highlight the face of the mountain and called it quits for the day.

Camera Settings:
Camera set on: Manual
Lens set on: Manual focus
Aperture: f/4 (its minimum)
Exposure time: 15 seconds
ISO: 1,600
White Balance: 4,000 K
Timer Delay: 2 seconds
Focused on: Infinity (I hope)

I'm open to critique/recommendations but keep in mind that this is my first time for celestial photography.

Jack Olson
Apache Junction, Arizona
I've always been intrigued by photographing the ni... (show quote)

Excellent image Jack

Reply
Apr 15, 2021 06:51:16   #
angler Loc: StHelens England
 
Excellent shot.

Reply
 
 
Apr 15, 2021 07:09:28   #
nimbushopper Loc: Tampa, FL
 

Reply
Apr 15, 2021 07:37:08   #
joehel2 Loc: Cherry Hill, NJ
 
Beautifully done, Jack.

Reply
Apr 15, 2021 07:42:19   #
tcthome Loc: NJ
 
jimvanells wrote:
You have learned your lessons well, great first effort. Would a trip into Topaz DeNoise help?


I was wondering the same even before this photo. Does Topaz DN work on Milky Way photos? I think the software for astro has some options in it but not 100% sure.

Reply
Apr 15, 2021 07:43:03   #
tcthome Loc: NJ
 
I would be extremely happy if that was my first Milky Way. Nice work.

Reply
 
 
Apr 15, 2021 07:58:38   #
jaymatt Loc: Alexandria, Indiana
 
That’s some shot, Jack, hard to believe it’s your first time out trying this.

Reply
Apr 15, 2021 08:03:32   #
blacks2 Loc: SF. Bay area
 
Excellent.

Reply
Apr 15, 2021 08:14:44   #
Juy Loc: Delaware
 
Very good first. Well done

Reply
Apr 15, 2021 08:16:45   #
yssirk123 Loc: New Jersey
 
Beautiful image Jack - you nailed it!

Reply
 
 
Apr 15, 2021 08:19:20   #
raymondh Loc: Walker, MI
 
You’ve set a pretty high bar with your 1st attempt.

Reply
Apr 15, 2021 08:41:08   #
MT native Loc: Big Sky Country — Montana
 
Glad to hear you have ordered a “wall hanger” for yourself. It’s a beauty !!

Reply
Apr 15, 2021 08:56:20   #
mizzee Loc: Boston,Ma
 
Well done!

Reply
Apr 15, 2021 09:02:29   #
Wilderness Images Loc: Apache Junction, AZ.
 
kymarto wrote:
I think it's excellent. I would have like a bit more foreground, but I can see that you did not want to cut the arm of the Milky Way. I think you needed a bit wider lens.


Thanks for the reply kymarto, the foreground in this view had lots of homes in the foothills, in fact, I had to clone out a whole strip of lights. Yes, I do need a wider lens, I'm looking for a good used 11mm or less.

Jack Olson

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.