How the c****av***s death toll compares to other p******cs, including SARS, HIV, and the Black Death
Apr 8, 2021 12:34:35 #
I know we have number crunchers here in the Attic.
To me the death rate compared to other diseases does not seem that bad.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/c****av***s-deaths-how-p******c-compares-to-other-deadly-outbreaks-2020-4%3famp
To me the death rate compared to other diseases does not seem that bad.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/c****av***s-deaths-how-p******c-compares-to-other-deadly-outbreaks-2020-4%3famp
Apr 8, 2021 13:13:08 #
soba1 wrote:
I know we have number crunchers here in the Attic.
To me the death rate compared to other diseases does not seem that bad.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/c****av***s-deaths-how-p******c-compares-to-other-deadly-outbreaks-2020-4%3famp
To me the death rate compared to other diseases does not seem that bad.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/c****av***s-deaths-how-p******c-compares-to-other-deadly-outbreaks-2020-4%3famp
Comparisons between this one and any one before the 1950's is not valid because of modern medical therapies. These comparisons are a waste of time
Apr 8, 2021 13:26:21 #
boberic wrote:
Comparisons between this one and any one before the 1950's is not valid because of modern medical therapies. These comparisons are a waste of time
Well its behind the swine flu.
A calculation should be done to average the yearly death rate of AIDS
Apr 8, 2021 16:19:47 #
The swine flu had no treatment modalities waiting in the wings.
Medical science has come a long way since then.
For c***d, we have had the benefits of scientific advancement...folks already studying various c****a v***ses...we got a bit of an advanced drop on treatment drugs and v*****es that the country could not benefit from with prior epidemics.
We should feel a little blessed in spite of the 560k and growing USA casualties.
If we had the same capabilities and knowledge we had 20 or 30 or 100 hundred years ago...who knows what our casualty count would be...
Medical science has come a long way since then.
For c***d, we have had the benefits of scientific advancement...folks already studying various c****a v***ses...we got a bit of an advanced drop on treatment drugs and v*****es that the country could not benefit from with prior epidemics.
We should feel a little blessed in spite of the 560k and growing USA casualties.
If we had the same capabilities and knowledge we had 20 or 30 or 100 hundred years ago...who knows what our casualty count would be...
Apr 8, 2021 16:48:07 #
Apr 8, 2021 16:55:06 #
I have divided 23,600,000 by 40.
AIDS deaths has averaged 590,000 per year
That’s the low end AIDS on average has k**led far more people than C***D.
Why not the draconian measures for AIDS.
AIDS deaths has averaged 590,000 per year
That’s the low end AIDS on average has k**led far more people than C***D.
Why not the draconian measures for AIDS.
Apr 9, 2021 07:53:49 #
Apples and oranges. Over 550,000 dead. THAT is the statistic that counts.
Apr 9, 2021 09:11:24 #
soba1 wrote:
I have divided 23,600,000 by 40.
AIDS deaths has averaged 590,000 per year
That’s the low end AIDS on average has k**led far more people than C***D.
Why not the draconian measures for AIDS.
AIDS deaths has averaged 590,000 per year
That’s the low end AIDS on average has k**led far more people than C***D.
Why not the draconian measures for AIDS.
AIDS is not spread through the air by asymptomatic carriers.
Apr 9, 2021 09:53:17 #
mwalsh wrote:
The swine flu had no treatment modalities waiting ... (show quote)
Yes, but Trump would have been too young to blame then.
Apr 9, 2021 11:15:20 #
JohnSwanda wrote:
AIDS is not spread through the air by asymptomatic carriers.
It doesn't but many innocent people have contracted it nonetheless.
Apr 9, 2021 11:21:56 #
I would guess the death rate were not too bad, you were not one of the dead.
soba1 wrote:
I know we have number crunchers here in the Attic.
To me the death rate compared to other diseases does not seem that bad.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/c****av***s-deaths-how-p******c-compares-to-other-deadly-outbreaks-2020-4%3famp
To me the death rate compared to other diseases does not seem that bad.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/c****av***s-deaths-how-p******c-compares-to-other-deadly-outbreaks-2020-4%3famp
Apr 9, 2021 11:24:20 #
Rose42 wrote:
It doesn't but many innocent people have contracted it nonetheless.
The post I was replying to asked why not the draconian measures for AIDS like we did with C***d. Masks and distancing and shutting things down would not have stopped AIDS.
Apr 9, 2021 11:56:44 #
Apr 9, 2021 12:14:20 #
soba1 wrote:
I know we have number crunchers here in the Attic.
To me the death rate compared to other diseases does not seem that bad.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/c****av***s-deaths-how-p******c-compares-to-other-deadly-outbreaks-2020-4%3famp
To me the death rate compared to other diseases does not seem that bad.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/c****av***s-deaths-how-p******c-compares-to-other-deadly-outbreaks-2020-4%3famp
Way outdated. Rev 5/2020
Apr 9, 2021 12:14:44 #
JohnSwanda wrote:
The post I was replying to asked why not the draconian measures for AIDS like we did with C***d. Masks and distancing and shutting things down would not have stopped AIDS.
I got her point fully yours as well. She had a darn good point
I saw something where someone who knew he had it was having unprotected sex. Why didnt we isolate people who were HIV positive.
That is if they truly cared about us
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.