Noise... It is a joke.
Mar 29, 2021 13:35:33 #
Quite frankly I do not see any noise issue if you use your camera properly as in not using it a "crop to see" magnifying tool.
Pixel peepers will said THERE IS NOISE regardless of what you do, entirely missing the point that they are a minority who look for 'defect' when there is none once reduced for printing and/or display.
The only noise to avoid is the noise created by the peanut gallery. Keep on trucking folks, bugs on your windshield will be washed out soon enough.
Pixel peepers will said THERE IS NOISE regardless of what you do, entirely missing the point that they are a minority who look for 'defect' when there is none once reduced for printing and/or display.
The only noise to avoid is the noise created by the peanut gallery. Keep on trucking folks, bugs on your windshield will be washed out soon enough.
Mar 29, 2021 13:46:48 #
Rongnongno wrote:
Quite frankly I do not see any noise issue if you use your camera properly as in not using it a "crop to see" magnify tool.
Pixel peepers will said THERE IS NOISE regardless of what you do, entirely missing the point that they are a minority who look for 'defect' when there is none once reduced for printing and/or display.
The only noise to avoid is the noise created by the peanut gallery. Keep on trucking folks, bugs on your windshield will be washed out soon enough.
Pixel peepers will said THERE IS NOISE regardless of what you do, entirely missing the point that they are a minority who look for 'defect' when there is none once reduced for printing and/or display.
The only noise to avoid is the noise created by the peanut gallery. Keep on trucking folks, bugs on your windshield will be washed out soon enough.
And as long as you don't try to shoot a black cat at midnight in a coal pile on Auto.
Mar 29, 2021 13:47:00 #
Rongnongno wrote:
Quite frankly I do not see any noise issue if you use your camera properly as in not using it a "crop to see" magnify tool.
Pixel peepers will said THERE IS NOISE regardless of what you do, entirely missing the point that they are a minority who look for 'defect' when there is none once reduced for printing and/or display.
The only noise to avoid is the noise created by the peanut gallery. Keep on trucking folks, bugs on your windshield will be washed out soon enough.
Pixel peepers will said THERE IS NOISE regardless of what you do, entirely missing the point that they are a minority who look for 'defect' when there is none once reduced for printing and/or display.
The only noise to avoid is the noise created by the peanut gallery. Keep on trucking folks, bugs on your windshield will be washed out soon enough.
Mar 29, 2021 13:47:54 #
Personally, I think it was a poor idea to carry the electrical engineering term over to photography. I equate "noise" with grain. Every film has it. Some higher ISO film have a more pronounced grain structure. Similarly, high ISO settings produce more "grain" in digital photographs. It's just part of the process and not one about which I worry.
--Bob
--Bob
Rongnongno wrote:
Quite frankly I do not see any noise issue if you use your camera properly as in not using it a "crop to see" magnify tool.
Pixel peepers will said THERE IS NOISE regardless of what you do, entirely missing the point that they are a minority who look for 'defect' when there is none once reduced for printing and/or display.
The only noise to avoid is the noise created by the peanut gallery. Keep on trucking folks, bugs on your windshield will be washed out soon enough.
Pixel peepers will said THERE IS NOISE regardless of what you do, entirely missing the point that they are a minority who look for 'defect' when there is none once reduced for printing and/or display.
The only noise to avoid is the noise created by the peanut gallery. Keep on trucking folks, bugs on your windshield will be washed out soon enough.
Mar 29, 2021 13:49:20 #
Fotoartist wrote:
And as long as you don't try to shoot a black cat at midnight in a coal pile on Auto.
Use a low intensity flash and you get golden eyes.
Mar 29, 2021 13:57:10 #
rmalarz wrote:
Personally, I think it was a poor idea to carry the electrical engineering term over to photography. I equate "noise" with grain. Every film has it. Some higher ISO film have a more pronounced grain structure. Similarly, high ISO settings produce more "grain" in digital photographs. It's just part of the process and not one about which I worry.
--Bob
--Bob
It is what it is.....
I've never hard as much ado about film grain,
but digital noise is certainly beat to death.
Mar 29, 2021 14:01:24 #
Mar 29, 2021 14:21:00 #
Longshadow wrote:
It is what it is.....
I've never hard as much ado about film grain,
but digital noise is certainly beat to death.
It is what it is.....
I've never hard as much ado about film grain,
but digital noise is certainly beat to death.
Amen.
Mar 29, 2021 14:23:01 #
quixdraw wrote:
There can be beautiful noise - in some photos.
Mar 29, 2021 14:26:13 #
Fotoartist wrote:
And as long as you don't try to shoot a black cat at midnight in a coal pile on Auto.
Ah yes but who would want to see such an image anyway ?????
Mar 29, 2021 15:20:15 #
JohnR wrote:
Ah yes but who would want to see such an image anyway ?????
Same person who would like to look at a polar bear in a snow storm?
Mar 29, 2021 16:13:19 #
Longshadow wrote:
Same person who would like to look at a polar bear in a snow storm?
Black cats at midnight on coal piles are relatively harmless - not so polar bears and snow storms. Only intrepid (or foolhardy) photographers brave the polar bears
Mar 29, 2021 16:57:05 #
All of you have me laughing here! 
I’m also enjoying the freedom to not be too upset about the noise I get especially from my somewhat older camera. While I marvel at the wow factor of some vivid and razor sharp photos, I also love the impact of some photos that capture a special mood or moment even if not technically perfect. Imagine how many amazing and sometimes historic moments we would have missed, such as this photo with horrible grain and uneven exposure!
I’m also enjoying the freedom to not be too upset about the noise I get especially from my somewhat older camera. While I marvel at the wow factor of some vivid and razor sharp photos, I also love the impact of some photos that capture a special mood or moment even if not technically perfect. Imagine how many amazing and sometimes historic moments we would have missed, such as this photo with horrible grain and uneven exposure!
Mar 29, 2021 17:03:43 #
JohnR wrote:
Black cats at midnight on coal piles are relatively harmless - not so polar bears and snow storms. Only intrepid (or foolhardy) photographers brave the polar bears
And NatGeo people.
Mar 29, 2021 17:08:12 #
Longshadow wrote:
...I've never hard as much ado about film grain,
but digital noise is certainly beat to death.
but digital noise is certainly beat to death.
When we were shooting film we weren’t posting on UHH.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.