Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
My camera is better tool than a hammer
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Mar 24, 2021 16:42:01   #
ggttc Loc: TN
 
rmalarz wrote:
First off, and to set things straight, I don't take pride in not using the video capabilities. It's a simple matter of no interest in making movies. There is a lot more to it than simply pushing the "movie" button.
--Bob


Agreed.

Reply
Mar 24, 2021 20:31:42   #
ronpier Loc: Poland Ohio
 
Baja Dan wrote:
Why is it that so many people on here pride themselves on not using their cameras video capability? Unless you are using your camera for a hammer all you are doing is capturing light, and for what purpose? To get a sharper image, to elicit some kind of emotional response, to show your friends and family where you have been or what you all looked like at Christmas? With video not only can you capture your favorite birds but you can hear them talking to each other. You can see them tuck their wings in and glide in feet first when they land on a twig or tuck their wings in and fly like a bullet for a short while. You can almost see them smiling. You can actually get to know the birds that you are photographing. Or how about that family gathering and hearing your brother joking and laughing or even better yet, the little ones giggling. I'm not saying "don't take photographs" I'm saying you're missing a huge part of what your camera can give you. With the internet and video drop boxes you can share the world with your whole family, not just the deaf mutes.--- Sorry about that last bit. Oh. and for those that say a picture is worth ten thousand words, I imagine you have ten thousand pictures, I know I do. I just don't have the wall space, or the time to look at them.
Why is it that so many people on here pride themse... (show quote)


I shot videos for years of our kids growing up. Never looked at them after the first time.

Reply
Mar 24, 2021 20:50:25   #
rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA
 
It's kind of like those people who use their smartphone for one thing only (for example, texting)... even if the smartphone is capable of so much more.

Admittedly, I don't shoot video very often with my camera. But I'm glad that feature's there! Sometimes still photography just won't do; the capture needs to be in video format.

Reply
 
 
Mar 24, 2021 21:26:45   #
10MPlayer Loc: California
 
I'm with you. Sometimes when I'm looking at a stream tumbling over the rocks to a small rapids or waterfall capturing the splashing and burbling sounds along with the movement is so much better than anything you can do with still photography. For some reason, maybe because the site is dedicated to still photography there is a huge amount of anti-movie chauvinism here. I don't get it. No one is saying don't take lots of still shots but why not once is a while shoot a few seconds of video.

Also, when I was still working, the young new guy I hired to replace me came up with the idea of making short how-to videos. This was about training staff how to do technical job tasks. That was six years ago. An eternity. Now you look on YouTube and you can find how-to videos on just about any subject you can image. Our DSLR cameras can do that easily.

I've looked up videos on such esoteric stuff as how to do anything from breaking down and cleaning a 1918 Luger to how replace the rechargeable batteries in a Dustbuster hand held vacuum. Yep, I supercharged my Dustbuster. After checking out a YouTube video I learned how to take out the old batteries and replace them with a better lithium ion battery that lasts longer and makes more power. That's just a small example of what you can do with a camera that has video capability. You're only limited by your imagination.

Reply
Mar 24, 2021 22:47:27   #
BamaTexan Loc: Deep in the heart of Texas
 
Why do you care Dan?

Reply
Mar 28, 2021 10:17:57   #
alberio Loc: Casa Grande AZ
 
cedymock wrote:
My son is a videographer for a quality 3 to 5 minute video it takes about 40 hours of work, no thank you.


I have single images that take that long...😃😃😃

Reply
Mar 28, 2021 10:48:05   #
sodapop Loc: Bel Air, MD
 
alberio wrote:
I have single images that take that long...😃😃😃


Me too. I enjoy ever minute of it. Anyone who considers it work should find another hobby

Reply
 
 
Mar 28, 2021 13:26:47   #
rlscholl Loc: California
 
A camera is a tool, just as a hammer is a tool. Different cameras are specialized for different tasks, just as there are different hammers for different tasks. Just as you can use a planishing hammer as a framing hammer doesn’t mean that it is the best tool for that application. Similarly, cameras are specialized tools. A camera optimized for still photography may be usable for creating videos doesn’t mean that a video camera, optimized for taking videos isn’t a better tool for that application. Back in the film days I had separate still and movie cameras. The still cameras were used significantly more than the movie cameras. Eventually, I stopped using the movie cameras altogether. After switching to digital cameras, I have yet to use one as a video camera, and have no interest in making videos. Others with different interests will choose appropriately. As they say, “different strokes for different folks.”

Reply
Mar 28, 2021 22:09:58   #
fantom Loc: Colorado
 
Baja Dan wrote:
Why is it that so many people on here pride themselves on not using their cameras video capability? Unless you are using your camera for a hammer all you are doing is capturing light, and for what purpose? To get a sharper image, to elicit some kind of emotional response, to show your friends and family where you have been or what you all looked like at Christmas? With video not only can you capture your favorite birds but you can hear them talking to each other. You can see them tuck their wings in and glide in feet first when they land on a twig or tuck their wings in and fly like a bullet for a short while. You can almost see them smiling. You can actually get to know the birds that you are photographing. Or how about that family gathering and hearing your brother joking and laughing or even better yet, the little ones giggling. I'm not saying "don't take photographs" I'm saying you're missing a huge part of what your camera can give you. With the internet and video drop boxes you can share the world with your whole family, not just the deaf mutes.--- Sorry about that last bit. Oh. and for those that say a picture is worth ten thousand words, I imagine you have ten thousand pictures, I know I do. I just don't have the wall space, or the time to look at them.
Why is it that so many people on here pride themse... (show quote)



Reply
Mar 28, 2021 22:19:19   #
fantom Loc: Colorado
 
dpullum wrote:
Dan made a Summary-Statement; "I'm not saying "don't take photographs" I'm saying you're missing a huge part of what your camera can give you. With the internet and video drop boxes you can share the world "

As of late, there has been debate in UHH Main regarding cameras that take video as well as stills ... as tho video capability sullies, makes impure, diminishes, the "still photo" functions. When consulted, the Nobel Prize Laureate Bob Dyllan would strum his guitar and sing "Don't stand in the doorway, the times are a changin' "

My Panasonic TZ100 Superzoom, 24/7 pocket camera is there and will take 4K video. From the thousands of stills in that video I can capture, select out, a good quality 8 Mpix image(s). For example, the ball just leaving the bat distorted by impact or a winged bat being captured by a bird of prey.

Dan is saying, I believe, why not have the best of both possible worlds video and still. While some may say 8 Mpix is low, it does fine for 8x10s, or with modern AI software the 8 Mpix images can be enhanced. If I wish to take a still, the quality on the 1" sensor is 20 Mpix. Dan is right with his expressed views.
Dan made a Summary-Statement; "I'm not saying... (show quote)


"Times are a changin'"--nope.

Thoughtful people (including photogs) have been using the best technologies available to them in order to get the best or most inclusive results that they possibly can ever since a cave man began making hand shadows on the cave wall. To belittle or not acknowledge an emerging technology is short sided and foolish. Whether or not one intentionally chooses not to take advantage of the technology is their rightful choice and decision.

Reply
Apr 10, 2021 06:55:34   #
F15emaddawg
 
Words my brain is in synch with, well spoken Dennis
Al

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.