lwerthe1mer wrote:
I am trying to substitute a sky in this photo. I used an A1 Quick Mask, trying to insert "green" at some very small placed. One place I messed up was between the wings. Any suggestions on completing this edit, or whether the photo is worthwhile?
Many thanks.
Okay, I couldn't help myself.... I had to try a little Photoshop on this image. I wasn't clear from your original post whether or not you'd already replaced the sky. My best guess was that this was the sky you wanted to use (and it works well with the subject).
First I tried to "clean up" some of the artifacts and halo I was seeing all around the bird, perhaps from previous work done on it. Simply used Photoshop clone tool by hand and worked with the image significantly enlarged (200 or 300%, probably).
Next I did a selection (instead of a mask or a layer & mask... both of which also could have worked).
To do this I used "color selection tool", selecting the background sky. The reason I chose to select the sky was because of the smoother tonalities and the greater similarity of the colors. Doing this, some of the bird inadvertently got selected too, so I used lasso tool to subtract any of that from the selection.
Then I inverted the selection, so it was the bird instead of the sky that was the "active" area of the image being worked upon.
Finally I refined the selection slightly by contracting it 1 pixel. Doing this avoids the artifacts and halos around the perimeter of the bird. The "edge" between the bird and the background is already plenty sharp after I did the artifact/halo cleanup.
Now I was able to work on the bird and only the bird.
First I sharpened the details of the bird a bit. This does make for some artifacts on its body, although I think they're a lot less noticeable there. While the bird was still selected, I also slightly lightened the mid tones and boosted contrast a little.
Done.
All together, it took about an hour. Would have been a lot less if the halo and artifacts didn't need to be corrected first.
I think it looks okay "at 100%" or smaller... but not any larger.
Probably could do a better job working from the original or at least a larger version of this shot.
See what you think...