Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
pixels to resolution
Page <prev 2 of 2
Feb 24, 2021 12:00:49   #
Strodav Loc: Houston, Tx
 
The more detail a subject contains the more pixels you need to put on the subject to capture the detail along with a lens capable of delivering the detail to the sensor. Capturing the detail is one thing, displaying it is something totally different. Don't confuse the two. IF you are only going to display on lower resolution, color depth limited displays, or make "smaller" prints, then why buy a higher mp camera with professional grade lenses? Now you are in to the realm of personal choice. You may choose to buy a camera and glass geared to lower resolution, color depth limited displays and "smaller" prints and can be very happy with the results. My choice is to buy the highest resolution sensor I can afford with the best quality glass I can afford in order to capture the most detail in camera I can. As display technology improves or I want to make high quality poster size prints, the detail will be there to use, but that is my personal choice.

Reply
Feb 24, 2021 12:26:28   #
bleirer
 
It is not intuitive, but there is no free lunch on cropping. When you crop you get somewhat less dynamic range. There is a formula for how much cropping equals how much loss of dynamic range, but I don't know it exactly.

Reply
Feb 24, 2021 12:47:43   #
PHRubin Loc: Nashville TN USA
 
My camera takes 6000 X 4000 pixel (24 MP) photos. My monitor is only about 1MP. Actually, my monitor is better, my video chip isn't. So viewing full photo on my monitor I can't tell the difference. But if I home in on a small section or crop, then I can.

Reply
 
 
Feb 24, 2021 13:10:08   #
JeffDavidson Loc: Originally Detroit Now Los Angeles
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
To understand the issue of 'resolution', you must understand the difference between 'pixel' and 'byte'. If you don't, you'll ask vague questions and receive misleading answers.

Resolution is properly understood as pixel resolution. Pixel resolution is very simply the length by width of an image, measured in pixels, and typically divided by 1-million to express as megapixel.

Therefore, an image at 6000x4000 is 24 megapixels or 24MP (6000 * 4000 / 1000000 = 24).

'Bytes' are a measure of storage. Bytes do not equal pixels. Pixels and bytes are not interchange terms, just a dark chocolate and 4.72 ounces are not interchangeable terms.

'Pixel' has a slightly different meaning in different contexts, but a pixel is generally thought of as the smallest single component of a digital image. As the smallest component of a digital image, a pixel is described by 'data' within the image file. That descriptive data has a storage size expressed in bytes. Images with more pixels contain more bytes making the files larger in size as expressed in bytes (or kilobytes or megabytes - MB). The data needed to describe a pixel varies based on the type of file and some techniques used to compress the storage size of this data. Therefore, you cannot take the pixel resolution and say with certainty how big (or small) the size in bytes of the file.
To understand the issue of 'resolution', you must ... (show quote)


Always knowledgeable and informative.

Reply
Feb 25, 2021 08:37:51   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
To understand the issue of 'resolution', you must understand the difference between 'pixel' and 'byte'. If you don't, you'll ask vague questions and receive misleading answers.

Resolution is properly understood as pixel resolution. Pixel resolution is very simply the length by width of an image, measured in pixels, and typically divided by 1-million to express as megapixel.

Therefore, an image at 6000x4000 is 24 megapixels or 24MP (6000 * 4000 / 1000000 = 24).

'Bytes' are a measure of storage. Bytes do not equal pixels. Pixels and bytes are not interchange terms, just a dark chocolate and 4.72 ounces are not interchangeable terms.

'Pixel' has a slightly different meaning in different contexts, but a pixel is generally thought of as the smallest single component of a digital image. As the smallest component of a digital image, a pixel is described by 'data' within the image file. That descriptive data has a storage size expressed in bytes. Images with more pixels contain more bytes making the files larger in size as expressed in bytes (or kilobytes or megabytes - MB). The data needed to describe a pixel varies based on the type of file and some techniques used to compress the storage size of this data. Therefore, you cannot take the pixel resolution and say with certainty how big (or small) the size in bytes of the file.
To understand the issue of 'resolution', you must ... (show quote)


However, "dark chocolate" and "4.72" calories are interchangeable, right? I mean it does not really matter. I prefer milk chocolate.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.