Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Client wants the Outtakes
Page <prev 2 of 12 next> last>>
Feb 13, 2021 14:33:49   #
joer Loc: Colorado/Illinois
 
fotoman150 wrote:
For you pros, or anyone with an opinion.

Occasionally, I get a client that wants me to post all of the outtakes (bad pictures) on their Zenfolio site so they can see them and judge for themselves whether or not to keep them.

This happened with the last wedding. I told them that I usually don't show those because it ruins the overall impression of the gallery and sometimes people even get angry when I show them because they feel like they got bad pictures.

The groom said he had several apps that could correct the photos. I told him that is uncool and that if there is something that needed work I would have retouched them and posted them.

We went back and forth like this for awhile until I just gave in and posted the outtakes because I felt like it was going to get me a bad review if I didn't. He was like, "We paid for pictures that we're not getting."

I've had this problem off and on for years. What is your opinion? I'm thinking about putting it in my contract that the outtakes will not be available for viewing, downloading or printing.
For you pros, or anyone with an opinion. br br Oc... (show quote)


Tell you client up front approximately how many images you will deliver and exceed that number...eliminating any argument. You never know how he will bastardize them or where they will be posted. Give them only your best...your reputation may be on the line.

Reply
Feb 13, 2021 17:51:26   #
rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA
 
BebuLamar wrote:
Besides from the photos you deliver to them, any others simply don't exist. How do they know that you have more photos than what you delivered to them?


If they saw you capturing images during the event that they obviously didn't receive, then they know that there were more. Of course you could claim that you already deleted them and they can no longer be retrieved.

Reply
Feb 13, 2021 18:03:08   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
BebuLamar wrote:
Besides from the photos you deliver to them, any others simply don't exist. How do they know that you have more photos than what you delivered to them?


I always re-number my files.
No way to see missing file numbers that way.

Reply
 
 
Feb 13, 2021 18:35:09   #
BebuLamar
 
rook2c4 wrote:
If they saw you capturing images during the event that they obviously didn't receive, then they know that there were more. Of course you could claim that you already deleted them and they can no longer be retrieved.


We have a lot of questions here where someone took pictures only to find out the pictures are not on the memory card. I am sure the OP didn't have the contract that stated for every time he clicked the shutter button he has to produce an image.

Reply
Feb 13, 2021 19:40:27   #
E.L.. Shapiro Loc: Ottawa, Ontario Canada
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Your contract language should cover this issue. Doesn't your contract speak to a range of a total number of images and services to be delivered? It would seem this request is outside the documented and agreed services and deliverables. If not, update your contract going forward. Or, use the other suggestion above and sell these additional images for a fixed fee, transferring them directly, not posting them along with the contracted deliverables.


Right on! He's got it!

I am not telling anyone what their policies should be- YOU the OP, has to decide what you want to stipulate on a wide range of issues as to the basics like price, schedule of payments, your rates and packages and the copyright aspects. You should also specify the disposition of so-called proofs, thumbnails, or whatever you want to call the complete choice of images you have submitted for selection.

I can tell you what I do. I simply NEVER submit defective, sub-standard, unflattering, or technically deficient images to a client. I don't usually get too many bloopers on a wedding coverage but Murphy's Law of wedding photography states that the client will select an out-of-focus, underexposed, and poorly composed image for a 30x40 portrait! Something that happened when the shutter release was accidently activated! Then they will ask you to frame and sign it! Bad as to "artistic integrity" and it's lousy PR!

The best way to preclude dissatisfied, argumentative, and disappointed clients is to spell out all your policies and explain your logical reason and benefits to the client for invoking your policies. If the client does not agree with your policies or methods, don't take on the job or you are asking for aggravation.

If I am in the midst of wedding reception and running and gunning a wild rock 'n' roll dance sequence and shooting 15 frames to grab a particular shot- who's counting? I'll pick the best to the sequence and cull the rest.
I'll shoot back up shots on formals and groups to avoid closed eyes and distracted expressions and edit out the misses. The client will still have a generous choice- closeups. 3/4 shots, full-face, profiles, 2/3 fill lengths and tons of action shots but the will be choosing out the best poses and candid sequences, not deciding whether to take a great shot or a failed image.

Again, in my own policies, I never have the client post-process, edit or print my work. It's artistic and business suicide! That's what thye pay me for! We explain in advance that the goal is to tell a comprehensive story of the day with all the romance, moods, celebration and fun and DESIGN an album that will be a joy to review over and over again. This puts everyone on a good cooperative trajectory. If you plan concisely, you will never have disagreements or misunderstandings with clients. If you do not plan and get everyone on the same page, you are walking into a minefield.

Of course, you can't simply adopt mine or anyone else's policies. You need to devise your own based on your experience and your clients' requirements. I am still kind of old school in that I produce WEDDING ALBUMS- in leather bindings with a minimum of 60 images. We have a separate video crew for folks who want that service and slideshows of stills are only sold accompanying album orders.

Reply
Feb 13, 2021 19:48:01   #
fotoman150
 
lowkick wrote:
Put in your contract that for X dollars you are delivering to them X number of finished photos. If they want more, then it will be an additional amount of money for a predetermined number of additional processed photos. Either that, or cull out all the photos that you wouldn't want others to see before you even show them the photos of the day.


I did that but they can see that there are gaps in the numbering of the files.

Reply
Feb 13, 2021 19:49:04   #
fotoman150
 
BebuLamar wrote:
Besides from the photos you deliver to them, any others simply don't exist. How do they know that you have more photos than what you delivered to them?


There are gaps in the file numbers

Reply
 
 
Feb 13, 2021 19:52:14   #
fotoman150
 
Toment wrote:
Our daughter’s photographer gave us all 1180 photos on 3 dvd’s. She did a beautiful job of PP and we bought albums etc.
it was fun to see all the others at a very fair price.


I did this once but there were thousands of images. I couldn’t retouch each one perfectly. And because they had some flaws the bride got mad. I told her to pick which ones she wanted to see work on and I would retouch only those.

Reply
Feb 13, 2021 19:55:05   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
fotoman150 wrote:
There are gaps in the file numbers


Re-name them so there aren't any gaps after you cull them!
I re-name ALL my files.

Reply
Feb 13, 2021 19:56:07   #
fotoman150
 
joer wrote:
Tell you client up front approximately how many images you will deliver and exceed that number...eliminating any argument. You never know how he will bastardize them or where they will be posted. Give them only your best...your reputation may be on the line.


Good call

Reply
Feb 13, 2021 19:57:01   #
fotoman150
 
rook2c4 wrote:
If they saw you capturing images during the event that they obviously didn't receive, then they know that there were more. Of course you could claim that you already deleted them and they can no longer be retrieved.


But then they are disappointed.

Reply
 
 
Feb 13, 2021 19:59:12   #
fotoman150
 
GoofyNewfie wrote:
Re-name them so there aren't any gaps!
I rename ALL my files.


I may have to do that.

Reply
Feb 13, 2021 20:12:04   #
fotoman150
 
E.L.. Shapiro wrote:
Right on! He's got it!

I am not telling anyone what their policies should be- YOU the OP, has to decide what you want to stipulate on a wide range of issues as to the basics like price, schedule of payments, your rates and packages and the copyright aspects. You should also specify the disposition of so-called proofs, thumbnails, or whatever you want to call the complete choice of images you have submitted for selection.

I can tell you what I do. I simply NEVER submit defective, sub-standard, unflattering, or technically deficient images to a client. I don't usually get too many bloopers on a wedding coverage but Murphy's Law of wedding photography states that the client will select an out-of-focus, underexposed, and poorly composed image for a 30x40 portrait! Something that happened when the shutter release was accidently activated! Then they will ask you to frame and sign it! Bad as to "artistic integrity" and it's lousy PR!

The best way to preclude dissatisfied, argumentative, and disappointed clients is to spell out all your policies and explain your logical reason and benefits to the client for invoking your policies. If the client does not agree with your policies or methods, don't take on the job or you are asking for aggravation.

If I am in the midst of wedding reception and running and gunning a wild rock 'n' roll dance sequence and shooting 15 frames to grab a particular shot- who's counting? I'll pick the best to the sequence and cull the rest.
I'll shoot back up shots on formals and groups to avoid closed eyes and distracted expressions and edit out the misses. The client will still have a generous choice- closeups. 3/4 shots, full-face, profiles, 2/3 fill lengths and tons of action shots but the will be choosing out the best poses and candid sequences, not deciding whether to take a great shot or a failed image.

Again, in my own policies, I never have the client post-process, edit or print my work. It's artistic and business suicide! That's what thye pay me for! We explain in advance that the goal is to tell a comprehensive story of the day with all the romance, moods, celebration and fun and DESIGN an album that will be a joy to review over and over again. This puts everyone on a good cooperative trajectory. If you plan concisely, you will never have disagreements or misunderstandings with clients. If you do not plan and get everyone on the same page, you are walking into a minefield.

Of course, you can't simply adopt mine or anyone else's policies. You need to devise your own based on your experience and your clients' requirements. I am still kind of old school in that I produce WEDDING ALBUMS- in leather bindings with a minimum of 60 images. We have a separate video crew for folks who want that service and slideshows of stills are only sold accompanying album orders.
Right on! He's got it! br br I am not telling any... (show quote)


Makes sense

One problem in this wedding I was subcontracted by a DJ company. So I had no way to sign a contract with the couple. From now on I will tell the DJ company to include my policies and I will add a new clause to my contract. Also will also renumber my images sequentially. Thanks

Reply
Feb 13, 2021 20:14:55   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
fotoman150 wrote:
I may have to do that.

I use a scheme that's used by a PhotoMechanic program and used by a lot of organizations.
Great program for culling and organizing BTW.
Almost instant viewing of raw file images.

My images all have unique names, not simply what the camera gives it.
DSCN_0267? Tells me nothing.
And a camera will give the same number later on after a while.
And if you're shooting with 2 cameras?

Today, my images would be named: 210213_001, 210213_002, etc.
I know that image was shot in 2021, Feb and on the 13th, or the 13th job that day. (I wish) and the frame number. All the 210213 images go in a folder with the same name, plus a short description of the job.
With Photomechanic, I populate the metadata to tell me what the job is, where it was, keywording....you name it, and it will add it. All that’s searchable. Takes only a few minutes and can be done at download (“Ingesting” as they call it)
Can be done in LightRoom too, if I'm not mistaken.
I've been using a form of that even in film days, so it was not hard to get used to it

Reply
Feb 13, 2021 20:24:30   #
fotoman150
 
GoofyNewfie wrote:
I use a scheme that's used by a PhotoMechanic program and used by a lot of organizations.
Great program for culling and organizing BTW.
Almost instant viewing of raw file images.

My images all have unique names, not simply what the camera gives it.
DSCN_0267? Tells me nothing.
And a camera will give the same number later on.
And if you're shooting with 2 cameras?

Today, my images would be 210213_001, 210213_002, etc.
I know that image was shot in 2021, Feb and on the 13th, or the 13th job that day. (I wish) and the frame number.
With Photomechanic, I populate the metadata to tell me what the job is, where it was, keywording....you name it, and it will add it. Takes only a few minutes and can be done at download (Ingesting as they call it)
Can be done in LightRoom too, if I'm not mistaken.
I've been using a form of that even in film days, so it was not hard to get used to it
I use a scheme that's used by a url=https://home.... (show quote)


Sounds good but I have this weird resistance to changing the file name. I’m going to have to get over it.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 12 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.