All my original photography without leaving Detroit. Making use of my figurine collection again, by blending it in with some of my other photography in Photoshop. I also did this in 3D with one camera and a slide bar. Retouching in stereo just about doubles the time involved. But when you see it in 3D the depth adds a whole other dimension to it.
BTW, you can examine the attempt at realism best in the download view.
Pretty cool work, Fotoartist.
--Bob
Fotoartist wrote:
All my original photography without leaving Detroit. Making use of my figurine collection again, by blending it in with some of my other photography in Photoshop. I also did this in 3D with one camera and a slide bar. Retouching in stereo just about doubles the time involved. But when you see it in 3D the depth adds a whole other dimension to it.
BTW, you can examine the attempt at realism best in the download view.
...my a$$ gets pretty flat, too, checkin' der screen. Very cool stuff, man!
Awesome work. For the sake of realism you could try turning down the saturation a touch.
FreddB
Loc: PA - Delaware County
R.G. wrote:
Awesome work. For the sake of realism you could try turning down the saturation a touch.
But there's nothing realistic about it
Wait a minute, when I lived in Michigan... Detroit... while there was a Saginaw Valley there were no mountains to go along with the valley! You said, "All my original photography without leaving Detroit." Do I sense fabrication here Fotoartist?? I am disillusioned, Fotoartist, until now I thought your wonderful imaginative photos were SOOC.
Keep up the good work, I like your works, thank you for sharing your creative imagination and SOOC, straight out of computer, skills.
Would love to see the 3D.
FreddB
Loc: PA - Delaware County
Sorry, missed that. But, still, the realism escapes me.
Very good, can I ask what that is behind the figure and the mountains that is the same colour as the elephant?
nanaval wrote:
Very good, can I ask what that is behind the figure and the mountains that is the same colour as the elephant?
I wondered about leaving that in. It is a large hatchet blade on his side behind. But if it causes you to question it then it should go because it's not that important. I will take it out. Thanks a lot.
Fotoartist wrote:
I wondered about leaving that in. It is a large hatchet blade on his side behind. But if it causes you to question it then it should go because it's not that important. I will take it out. Thanks a lot.
I think will look better with out it as at first to me it looked like part of the elephant and I did think as to how it got there..
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.