Democrats, R****m and the N**i Party (Page 2): You didn't watch the video or you wouldn't have said to read a history book.

skylane5sp Loc: Puyallup, WA

ken_stern wrote:

In addition to -- Open an American History Book --
I should have added "Then have someone read it to you - SLOWLY

You didn't watch the video or you wouldn't have said to read a history book.

ken_stern Loc: Yorba Linda, Ca

skylane5sp wrote:

You didn't watch the video or you wouldn't have said to read a history book.

BS -- I held my nose & watched the damn thing
Back then & for all of WWII FORD plants in Germany made trucks for the N**i's
By reading valid history you have access to what really went on & why vs this Clown's warped out of reality historic crap

skylane5sp Loc: Puyallup, WA

ken_stern wrote:

BS -- I held my nose & watched the damn thing
Back then & for all of WWII FORD plants in Germany made trucks for the N**i's
By reading valid history you have access to what really went on & why vs this Clown's warped out of reality historic crap

Dude, calm the eff down. Not disputing what you are saying. D'Sousa is far from a 'Clown'. He was merely pointing out one very d********g aspect of our history that has been conveniently glossed over.

Here's his previous video on the subject where he responded to a history professor about 'history books'.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yn_UaFidhxc

Reddog Loc: Southern Calif

National Park wrote:

I am well aware of the r****t history of the Democrat party. I am also aware that the remains of the r****t elements of the party moved to the Republican party during the 1960's when Johnson got Civil Rights bills enacted into law.

Shhhhh, that’s not part of history the right does not like to hear!
Dixiecrats moving to GOP!🤫

phcaan Loc: Willow Springs, MO

ken_stern wrote:

That was then - This is now

That was before the democratic party's love for the c*******t Chinese party and their philosophy of total control.

Tex-s

National Park wrote:

I am well aware of the r****t history of the Democrat party. I am also aware that the remains of the r****t elements of the party moved to the Republican party during the 1960's when Johnson got Civil Rights bills enacted into law.

Try to name 3 Reps of either national House that v**ed as a Democrat against the Civil Rights Act(s) that were elected as Republicans. The reason you cannot is simple. There is ONE. Strom Thurmond. All the rest remained Democrats until they retired, died, or were ousted by e******ns.

InfiniteISO Loc: The Carolinas, USA

Tex-s wrote:

Try to name 3 Reps of either national House that v**ed as a Democrat against the Civil Rights Act(s) that were elected as Republicans. The reason you cannot is simple. There is ONE. Strom Thurmond. All the rest remained Democrats until they retired, died, or were ousted by e******ns.

Of course you're right, but it's not like liberals to do any kind of research. They would rather shout lies and exaggerations then move on to the next talking point that they learned from pundits who are just as intellectually lazy or corrupt as they are.

We are living in an age of selective editing and historical fabrication. T***h is not something you give in unvarnished totality, it's something you craft to fit your narrative.

Both parties practice this manipulation of message, but the Republicans suck at it.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

ken_stern wrote:

Ask yourself these two questions:
a) Why did the South (old confederacy) v**e solid Democrat from before the Civil War until the mid-1960s
b) Why does the South (old confederacy) now v**e solid (well almost -- Va & Ga) Republican since the mid-1960s

It's all in that History Book & it's all about Race!!!

Bull Caca, that is the biggest bunch of crap posted on this forum.

https://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/10/magazine/10Section2b.t-4.html

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

phcaan wrote:

Sieg heil comrade Park.

From the guy who said "facts are highly overrated".

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

phcaan wrote:

You mean that you read them? I thought all you folks did was tear down statues and remove historical books that don't fit your controlling agenda. You know, rewrite history as you want it to be to fit your version of what it should have been.

Please don't say you thought. Many people who actually do think, consider that insulting.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

thom w wrote:

Please don't say you thought. Many people who actually do think, consider that insulting.

Really, this from the party apparatchik who is paid not to think.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

InfiniteISO wrote:

Below, from Wikipedia here are the v**es for the C... (show quote)

This simply represents that throughout the south, people refused to v**e for "the party of Lincoln", until they found "the party of civil rights" even less palatable.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

Blurryeyed wrote:

Really, this from the party apparatchik who is paid not to think.

You can say that, but if you want people to believe it, you need to defend it.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

thom w wrote:

You can say that, but if you want people to believe it, you need to defend it.

Why should I have to defend it when you prove it with almost every post? "Come on man!" some things are just obvious and need no further explanation.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

Blurryeyed wrote:

Bull Caca, that is the biggest bunch of crap posted on this forum.

https://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/10/magazine/10Section2b.t-4.html

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jesse-Helms

If Thurmond was still here, you could ask him why he left the Democrats for the Dixiecrats, and then became a Republican.