4 cleaning?
...............................................message ends....................................
Vacuum cleaner won’t work in a vacuum.
Carl1024 wrote:
4 cleaning?
...............................................message ends....................................
Four cleanings should be adequate.
That's really an MCP comment!
yorkiebyte
Loc: Scottsdale, AZ/Bandon by the Sea, OR
cambriaman wrote:
That's really an MCP comment!
Thanks for catching that!! Not sure what "MCP" means however... other than metacarpophalangeal joints (MCP)
Carl1024 wrote:
4 cleaning?
...............................................message ends....................................
No.
70% isopropyl alcohol is 30% water. It is intended for medical use on the skin and is diluted with water so that it can me sold at a low cost. The water is not beneficial for cleaning anything.
I do not use alcohol as a cleaner on any of my camera equipment, regardless of concentration. One of the things it is best at cleaning is adhesives of many kinds...including the adhesive on the double-sided tape that holds the rubber grip material on your cameras.
For eyeglasses, I don't believe you will like the eventual effect it will have on plastic materials, lens coatings, or nose pads.
Some folks use a small amount on a Q-Tip to clean lens and flash contacts. I do not.
As clarification of why I don't use alcohol on my cameras, one thing I do use it for is removing paint from used two-way radio equipment that I purchase from time to time to be refurbished. I figure that anything that will remove paint is too aggressive to use on my cameras.
User ID wrote:
Vacuum cleaner won’t work in a vacuum.
The moon has an atmosphere, it is not a vacuum. The atmosphere is just not as dense as earth, but it is more dense than space.
yorkiebyte
Loc: Scottsdale, AZ/Bandon by the Sea, OR
HiFromSusan wrote:
male chauvinist pig!
Oh! Okay then. Not the intent of showing that meme but a play on the OP's apparent dysfunctional puzzle as a post question (?).
That meme was about as anti-feminist and sexist as one can get. No kidding! HOWEVER, I'm not starting a politizing discussion here or anywhere else!!
This is only to show that if you are going to ask a question (OP), it should be articulate enough that us idiots here on UHH (me!) can at least have a fighting chance to offer a small bit of knowledge without drama or puzzlement. With my Passive-Aggressive type personality, sometimes I just can't stay reserved enough
not to jump in and say something!And, THANK YOU
HiFromSusan for the clarification on MCP!! I was so far off that as to make me quite silly!! ....Whooohoo!!
yorkiebyte wrote:
Oh! Okay then. Not the intent of showing that meme but a play on the OP's apparent dysfunctional puzzle as a post question (?).
That meme was about as anti-feminist and sexist as one can get. No kidding! HOWEVER, I'm not starting a politizing discussion here or anywhere else!!
This is only to show that if you are going to ask a question (OP), it should be articulate enough that us idiots here on UHH (me!) can at least have a fighting chance to offer a small bit of knowledge without drama or puzzlement. With my Passive-Aggressive type personality, sometimes I just can't stay reserved enough
not to jump in and say something!And, THANK YOU
HiFromSusan for the clarification on MCP!! I was so far off that as to make me quite silly!! ....Whooohoo!!
Oh! Okay then. Not the intent of showing that mem... (
show quote)
Don't feel alone, Yorkiebyte! I didn't have a clue what it meant either.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.